Literature DB >> 22367993

Prognosis of coma after therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective cohort study.

Aline Bouwes1, Jan M Binnekade, Michael A Kuiper, Frank H Bosch, Durk F Zandstra, Arnoud C Toornvliet, Hazra S Biemond, Bas M Kors, Johannes H T M Koelman, Marcel M Verbeek, Henry C Weinstein, Albert Hijdra, Janneke Horn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to establish the reliability of neurologic examination, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) to predict poor outcome in patients treated with mild hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included adult comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after CPR and treated with hypothermia (32-34°C). False-positive rates (FPRs 1 - specificity) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for pupillary light responses, corneal reflexes, and motor scores 72 hours after CPR; NSE levels at admission, 12 hours after reaching target temperature, and 36 hours and 48 hours after collapse; and SEPs during hypothermia and after rewarming. The primary outcome was poor outcome, defined as death, vegetative state, or severe disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1-3) after 6 months.
RESULTS: Of 391 patients included, 53% had a poor outcome. Absent pupillary light responses (FPR 1; 95% CI, 0-7) or absent corneal reflexes (FPR 4; 95% CI, 1-13) 72 hours after CPR, and absent SEPs during hypothermia (FPR 3; 95% CI, 1-7) and after rewarming (FPR 0; 95% CI, 0-18) were reliable predictors. Motor scores 72 hours after CPR (FPR 10; 95% CI, 6-16) and NSE levels were not.
INTERPRETATION: In patients with persisting coma after CPR and therapeutic hypothermia, use of motor score or NSE, as recommended in current guidelines, could possibly lead to inappropriate withdrawal of treatment. Poor outcomes can reliably be predicted by testing brainstem reflexes 72 hours after CPR and performing SEP.
Copyright © 2011 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22367993     DOI: 10.1002/ana.22632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  78 in total

Review 1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and management of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Jasmeet Soar; Volker Wenzel; Peter Paal
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  [Prognostic assessment as the basis for limiting therapy in unconscious patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Authors:  H-R Arntz; H-C Mochmann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Neural repair and rehabilitation: the effect of therapeutic hypothermia on prognostication.

Authors:  Romergryko G Geocadin; Peter W Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Bilateral loss of cortical SSEP responses is compatible with good outcome after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Andreas Bender; Kaitlen Howell; Marcel Frey; Ansgar Berlis; Markus Naumann; Gernot Buheitel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  The Influence of Therapeutics on Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Sachin Agarwal; Nicholas Morris; Caroline Der-Nigoghossian; Teresa May; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Increased Thyroxin During Therapeutic Hypothermia Predicts Death in Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Mathieu van der Jagt; Saskia Knoops; Margriet F C de Jong; Martin J de Jong; Robin P Peeters; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  In reply.

Authors:  Frank Thömke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Prognostic assessment always requires several parameters.

Authors:  Christoph Leithner; Christoph J Ploner; Christian Storm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Neurological examination of critically ill patients: a pragmatic approach. Report of an ESICM expert panel.

Authors:  Tarek Sharshar; Giuseppe Citerio; Peter J D Andrews; Arturo Chieregato; Nicola Latronico; David K Menon; Louis Puybasset; Claudio Sandroni; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Assessing prognosis following cardiopulmonary resuscitation and therapeutic hypothermia-a critical discussion of recent studies.

Authors:  Frank Thömke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.