Philipp Bücke1, Marta Aguilar Pérez2, Elisabeth Schmid3, Christian H Nolte4,5, Hansjörg Bäzner3, Hans Henkes2,6. 1. Neurological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60-62, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. philipp.buecke@googlemail.com. 2. Neuroradiological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60-62, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. 3. Neurological Clinic, Neurocenter, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60-62, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. 4. Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. 5. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. 6. Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (mTE) in acute ischemic stroke due to large cerebral artery occlusion is effective and safe. The procedure is currently offered by specialized hospitals. Physicians from smaller hospitals need to refer patients to stroke centers. Secondary referrals involve delays for transportation. Little is known about effects of distant referrals on outcome and complications as compared to direct admittance. METHODS: To evaluate the effects of referral patterns on outcome and safety, we analyzed 941 patients with anterior circulation stroke receiving mTE between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three groups: directly admitted patients (DAP), inner-city transfers (ICT) and long-distance referrals (LDR). We assessed (1) procedural parameters (2) frequency of good functional outcome (mRS ≤2 at 3 months) and (3) mortality rates. RESULTS: Referrals had a significantly longer imaging-to-groin time compared to DAP (median 150 min vs. 85 min, p <0.001), the same was true for LDR vs. ICT (median 157 min vs. 133.5 min, p <0.001). Time to recanalization was significantly longer for referrals compared to DAP (median 348 min vs. 260 min, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in the frequency of good functional outcome (DAP 39.5%, ICT 35.1%, LDR 37.0%; p =0.709), all-cause mortality at day 90 (DAP 31.5%, ICT 23.0%, LDR 27.0%; p =0.212) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p =0.834). CONCLUSION: Timing remains a critical factor in acute ischemic stroke treatment by endovascular means. Long distance referral to specialized neurovascular centers with high recanalization rates, however, does allow for a good functional outcome in a significant number of patients.
PURPOSE: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (mTE) in acute ischemic stroke due to large cerebral artery occlusion is effective and safe. The procedure is currently offered by specialized hospitals. Physicians from smaller hospitals need to refer patients to stroke centers. Secondary referrals involve delays for transportation. Little is known about effects of distant referrals on outcome and complications as compared to direct admittance. METHODS: To evaluate the effects of referral patterns on outcome and safety, we analyzed 941 patients with anterior circulation stroke receiving mTE between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three groups: directly admitted patients (DAP), inner-city transfers (ICT) and long-distance referrals (LDR). We assessed (1) procedural parameters (2) frequency of good functional outcome (mRS ≤2 at 3 months) and (3) mortality rates. RESULTS: Referrals had a significantly longer imaging-to-groin time compared to DAP (median 150 min vs. 85 min, p <0.001), the same was true for LDR vs. ICT (median 157 min vs. 133.5 min, p <0.001). Time to recanalization was significantly longer for referrals compared to DAP (median 348 min vs. 260 min, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in the frequency of good functional outcome (DAP 39.5%, ICT 35.1%, LDR 37.0%; p =0.709), all-cause mortality at day 90 (DAP 31.5%, ICT 23.0%, LDR 27.0%; p =0.212) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p =0.834). CONCLUSION: Timing remains a critical factor in acute ischemic stroke treatment by endovascular means. Long distance referral to specialized neurovascular centers with high recanalization rates, however, does allow for a good functional outcome in a significant number of patients.
Authors: Matthias Wendt; Martin Ebinger; Alexander Kunz; Michal Rozanski; Carolin Waldschmidt; Joachim E Weber; Benjamin Winter; Peter M Koch; Erik Freitag; Jenrik Reich; Daniel Schremmer; Heinrich J Audebert Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Pfaff; M Pham; C Herweh; M Wolf; P A Ringleb; S Schönenberger; M Bendszus; M Möhlenbruch Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Pascal P Gratz; Simon Jung; Gerhard Schroth; Jan Gralla; Pasquale Mordasini; Kety Hsieh; Mirjam R Heldner; Heinrich P Mattle; Marie-Luise Mono; Urs Fischer; Marcel Arnold; Christoph Zubler Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Robert G Hart; Hans-Christoph Diener; Shelagh B Coutts; J Donald Easton; Christopher B Granger; Martin J O'Donnell; Ralph L Sacco; Stuart J Connolly Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ryan A McTaggart; Shadi Yaghi; Shawna M Cutting; Morgan Hemendinger; Grayson L Baird; Richard A Haas; Karen L Furie; Mahesh V Jayaraman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Ying Xian; Shubin Sheng; Kori S Zachrison; Jeffrey L Saver; Kevin N Sheth; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Philipp Bücke; Marta Aguilar Pérez; Muhammad AlMatter; Victoria Hellstern; Hansjörg Bäzner; Hans Henkes Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Philipp Bücke; Hans Henkes; Guy Arnold; Birgit Herting; Eric Jüttler; Christof Klötzsch; Alfred Lindner; Uwe Mauz; Ludwig Niehaus; Matthias Reinhard; Stefan Waibel; Thomas Horvath; Hansjörg Bäzner; Marta Aguilar Pérez Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 6.288