Ryan A McTaggart1, Shadi Yaghi2, Shawna M Cutting2, Morgan Hemendinger2, Grayson L Baird3, Richard A Haas4, Karen L Furie2, Mahesh V Jayaraman1. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island2Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island3Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island5Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence. 4. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island3Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Abstract
Importance: While prehospital triage to the closest comprehensive stroke center (CSC) may improve the delivery of care for patients with suspected emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO), efficient systems of care must also exist for patients with ELVO who first present to a primary stroke center (PSC). Objective: To describe the association of a PSC protocol focused on 3 key steps (early CSC notification based on clinical severity, vessel imaging at the PSC, and cloud-based image sharing) with the efficiency of care and the outcomes of patients with suspected ELVO who first present to a PSC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, 14 regional PSCs unfamiliar with the management of patients with ELVO were instructed on the use of the following protocol for patients presenting with a Los Angeles Motor Scale score 4 or higher: (1) notify the CSC on arrival, (2) perform computed tomographic angiography concurrently with noncontract computed tomography of the brain and within 30 minutes of arrival, and (3) share imaging data with the CSC using a cloud-based platform. A total of 101 patients were transferred from regional PSCs to the CSC between July 1, 2015, and May 31, 2016, and received mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. The CSC serves approximately 1.7 million people and partners with 14 PSCs located between 6.4 and 73.6 km away. All consecutive patients with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusions transferred over an 11-month period were reviewed, and they were divided into 2 groups based on whether the PSC protocol was partially or fully executed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were efficiency measures including time from PSC door in to PSC door out, time from PSC door to CSC groin puncture, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0-6; scores of 0-2 indicate a good outcome). Results: Although 101 patients were transferred, only 70 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. The protocol was partially executed for 48 patients (68.6%) (mean age, 77 years [interquartile range, 65-84 years]; 22 of the 48 patients [45.0%] were women) and fully executed for 22 patients (31.4%) (mean age, 76 years [interquartile range, 59-86 years]; 13 of the 22 patients [59.1%] were women). When fully executed, the protocol was associated with a reduction in the median time for PSC arrival to CSC groin puncture (from 151 minutes [95% CI, 141-166 minutes] to 111 minutes [95% CI, 88-130 minutes]; P < .001). This was primarily related to an improvement in the time from PSC door in to door out that reduced from a median time of 104 minutes (95% CI, 82-112 minutes) to a median time of 64 minutes (95% CI, 51-71.0 minutes) (P < .001). When the protocol was fully executed, patients were twice as likely to have a favorable outcome (50% vs 25%, P < .04). Conclusions and Relevance: When fully implemented, a standardized protocol at PSCs for patients with suspected ELVO consisting of early CSC notification, computed tomographic angiography on arrival to the PSC, and cloud-based image sharing is associated with a reduction in time to groin puncture and improved outcomes.
Importance: While prehospital triage to the closest comprehensive stroke center (CSC) may improve the delivery of care for patients with suspected emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO), efficient systems of care must also exist for patients with ELVO who first present to a primary stroke center (PSC). Objective: To describe the association of a PSC protocol focused on 3 key steps (early CSC notification based on clinical severity, vessel imaging at the PSC, and cloud-based image sharing) with the efficiency of care and the outcomes of patients with suspected ELVO who first present to a PSC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, 14 regional PSCs unfamiliar with the management of patients with ELVO were instructed on the use of the following protocol for patients presenting with a Los Angeles Motor Scale score 4 or higher: (1) notify the CSC on arrival, (2) perform computed tomographic angiography concurrently with noncontract computed tomography of the brain and within 30 minutes of arrival, and (3) share imaging data with the CSC using a cloud-based platform. A total of 101 patients were transferred from regional PSCs to the CSC between July 1, 2015, and May 31, 2016, and received mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. The CSC serves approximately 1.7 million people and partners with 14 PSCs located between 6.4 and 73.6 km away. All consecutive patients with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusions transferred over an 11-month period were reviewed, and they were divided into 2 groups based on whether the PSC protocol was partially or fully executed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were efficiency measures including time from PSC door in to PSC door out, time from PSC door to CSC groin puncture, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0-6; scores of 0-2 indicate a good outcome). Results: Although 101 patients were transferred, only 70 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. The protocol was partially executed for 48 patients (68.6%) (mean age, 77 years [interquartile range, 65-84 years]; 22 of the 48 patients [45.0%] were women) and fully executed for 22 patients (31.4%) (mean age, 76 years [interquartile range, 59-86 years]; 13 of the 22 patients [59.1%] were women). When fully executed, the protocol was associated with a reduction in the median time for PSC arrival to CSC groin puncture (from 151 minutes [95% CI, 141-166 minutes] to 111 minutes [95% CI, 88-130 minutes]; P < .001). This was primarily related to an improvement in the time from PSC door in to door out that reduced from a median time of 104 minutes (95% CI, 82-112 minutes) to a median time of 64 minutes (95% CI, 51-71.0 minutes) (P < .001). When the protocol was fully executed, patients were twice as likely to have a favorable outcome (50% vs 25%, P < .04). Conclusions and Relevance: When fully implemented, a standardized protocol at PSCs for patients with suspected ELVO consisting of early CSC notification, computed tomographic angiography on arrival to the PSC, and cloud-based image sharing is associated with a reduction in time to groin puncture and improved outcomes.
Authors: Mahesh V Jayaraman; Arshad Iqbal; Brian Silver; Matthew S Siket; Caryn Amedee; Ryan A McTaggart; Gino Paolucci; Jason Rhodes; John Potvin; Megan Tucker; Nicole Alexander-Scott Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chung-Huan J Sun; Raul G Nogueira; Brenda A Glenn; Kerrin Connelly; Susan Zimmermann; Kim Anda; Deborah Camp; Michael R Frankel; Samir R Belagaje; Aaron M Anderson; Alexander P Isakov; Rishi Gupta Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170
Authors: Mohamed S Teleb; Anna Ver Hage; Jaqueline Carter; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Ryan A McTaggart Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Benjamin P George; Sara J Doyle; George P Albert; Ania Busza; Robert G Holloway; Kevin N Sheth; Adam G Kelly Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M A Almekhlafi; W G Kunz; R A McTaggart; M V Jayaraman; M Najm; S H Ahn; E Fainardi; M Rubiera; A V Khaw; A Zini; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; M Goyal; B K Menon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Melissa S Eng; Anand V Patel; Richard B Libman; Paul Wright; Jeffrey M Katz Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Yaqian Xu; Neal S Parikh; Boshen Jiao; Joshua Z Willey; Amelia K Boehme; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Ying Xian; Shubin Sheng; Kori S Zachrison; Jeffrey L Saver; Kevin N Sheth; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M A Almekhlafi; W G Kunz; B K Menon; R A McTaggart; M V Jayaraman; B W Baxter; D Heck; D Frei; C P Derdeyn; T Takagi; A H Aamodt; I M R Fragata; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; M Goyal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gregoire Boulouis; Arne Lauer; Ahmer Khawdja Siddiqui; Andreas Charidimou; Robert W Regenhardt; Anand Viswanathan; Natalia Rost; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Lee H Schwamm Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Neal S Parikh; Abhinaba Chatterjee; Iván Díaz; Ankur Pandya; Alexander E Merkler; Gino Gialdini; Benjamin R Kummer; Saad A Mir; Michael P Lerario; Matthew E Fink; Babak B Navi; Hooman Kamel Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 7.914