Mohsen Mazidi1, Erin D Michos2, Maciej Banach3. 1. Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, International College, University of Chinese Academy, Beijing, China; Key State Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chaoyang, Beijing, China. 2. Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3. Department of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Poland; Healthy Aging Research Centre (HARC), Lodz, Poland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Higher vitamin D levels and longer telomere length (TL) have been associated with lower risk of several chronic diseases and all-cause mortality. However, direct relationships between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and TL are not well established. Vitamin D could influence TL through its anti-inflammatory properties. This study aimed to assess the relationship between vitamin D levels and TL in US adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with data available on 25(OH)D and TL measures from 2001 to 2002 were included. 25(OH)D levels were measured by the DiaSorin Radioimmunoassay. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression models, accounting for the survey design and sample weights. RESULTS: Of the 4347 eligible participants, 47.0% (n = 2045) were men. The mean age was 42.7 years overall, 49.2 years in men and 42.5 years in women (p = 0.060). After adjustment for age, race, marital status, education, and C-reactive protein, each 1 ng/ml higher 25(OH)D level was associated with a 0.045 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.032 to 0.059) longer telomere-to-single copy gene (T/S) ratio. This was driven by a significant association in women (0.054 (0.043 to 0.064)) and in men (0.036 (0.020 to 0.052)). However, after we further adjusted for smoking, body mass index, and physical activity, no significant relation was found in the overall sample (β coefficient -0.026, 95% CI: -3.16, 1.67), for men (-0.016 (-3.72, 2.64)), or for women (-0.052 (-6.85, 2.26)). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a possible positive association between 25(OH)D levels and telomere length. The implications of this association deserve further investigation.
INTRODUCTION: Higher vitamin D levels and longer telomere length (TL) have been associated with lower risk of several chronic diseases and all-cause mortality. However, direct relationships between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and TL are not well established. Vitamin D could influence TL through its anti-inflammatory properties. This study aimed to assess the relationship between vitamin D levels and TL in US adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with data available on 25(OH)D and TL measures from 2001 to 2002 were included. 25(OH)D levels were measured by the DiaSorin Radioimmunoassay. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression models, accounting for the survey design and sample weights. RESULTS: Of the 4347 eligible participants, 47.0% (n = 2045) were men. The mean age was 42.7 years overall, 49.2 years in men and 42.5 years in women (p = 0.060). After adjustment for age, race, marital status, education, and C-reactive protein, each 1 ng/ml higher 25(OH)D level was associated with a 0.045 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.032 to 0.059) longer telomere-to-single copy gene (T/S) ratio. This was driven by a significant association in women (0.054 (0.043 to 0.064)) and in men (0.036 (0.020 to 0.052)). However, after we further adjusted for smoking, body mass index, and physical activity, no significant relation was found in the overall sample (β coefficient -0.026, 95% CI: -3.16, 1.67), for men (-0.016 (-3.72, 2.64)), or for women (-0.052 (-6.85, 2.26)). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a possible positive association between 25(OH)D levels and telomere length. The implications of this association deserve further investigation.
Telomeres are nucleoprotein “caps” formed of repetitive DNA sequences and specialized proteins at the ends of chromosomes [1]. They protect chromosomes from deterioration and fusion during mitosis [1]. Telomeres are progressively eroded with successive rounds of cell divisions and by attrition, attributed to processes such as oxidative stress [2]. There is variation in telomere length (TL) between persons of equal chronological age, due to differences in both genetic and environmental determinants [3-5].Shorter leukocyte TL is associated with aging [6] and age-related diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) [7], diabetes mellitus (DM) [8], hypertension (HTN) [9], and all-cause mortality [10]. Epidemiological studies have found associations of higher vitamin D status, as measured by circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations, with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and several non-skeletal diseases including CVD [11, 12], although there are inconsistencies across studies [13]. Vitamin D status could plausibly affect the maintenance of TL directly or via effects on mechanisms including inflammation and/or the rate of cell proliferation [14, 15]. If higher vitamin D status limits the rate of telomere erosion in a causal fashion, 25(OH)D concentrations could represent a modifiable treatment target for maintenance of TL over the life course. Two large cross-sectional studies have studied 25(OH)D concentrations in relation to TL in populations of healthy women (both pre- and postmenopausal) [16]. Both studies reported that higher 25(OH)D levels were associated with longer TL. In another study of US radiology technologists, vitamin D deficiency was associated with shorter TL in whites but not blacks [17]. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated this issue in a large population-based sample of both US adult men and women.Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and TL in a cohort of adults representative of the general US population.
Material and methods
Population
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) are ongoing repeated cross sectional surveys conducted by the US National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). NHANES uses a multistage probability sampling strategy, which oversamples certain subgroups of the population, including blacks, Mexican-Americans, and those of lower socioeconomic status. The NCHS Research Ethics Review Board approved the NHANES protocol and consent was obtained from all participants. About 5000 subjects participate in NHANES each year, and the data are reported in 2-year cycles available for public use. Data collection on demographic, dietary, and behavioral information occurs through in-home administered questionnaires, while anthropometric and biomarker data are collected by trained staff using mobile examination units. The interview consists of questions on socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, education, race/Hispanic origin, and health insurance) and questions on previously diagnosed medical conditions. More detailed information on the NHANES protocol is available elsewhere [18].This study was based on analysis of data from the 2001–2002 NHANES cycle. We included participants aged 18 years and older who had available data on both 25(OH) D and TL measures. Adults with a history of diabetes, coronary heart disease, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke or congestive heart failure were excluded.
Telomere measurements
Briefly, aliquots of purified DNA, isolated from whole blood using the Puregene (D-50 K) kit protocol (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota), were obtained from participants. The leukocyte telomere length (LTL) assay was performed in the laboratory of Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn at the University of California, San Francisco, using the quantitative polymerase chain reaction method to measure LTL relative to standard reference DNA (also known as the telomere-to-single copy gene (T/S) ratio) [19]. Each sample was assayed 3 times on 3 different days. The samples were assayed on duplicate wells, resulting in 6 data points. Control DNA values were used to normalize between-run variability. Runs with more than 4 control DNA values falling outside 2.5 standard deviations from the mean for all assay runs were excluded from further analysis (6% of runs). For each sample, any potential outliers were identified and excluded from the calculations (2% of samples). The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) conducted a quality control review before linking the LTL data to the NHANES data files. The CDC Institutional Review Board granted human subject approval for this study.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
Total serum 25(OH)D was measured at the National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) kit (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN, USA) [20]. The sensitivity of this assay has been shown to be 1.5 ng/ml and the coefficient of variance (CV) was 7% [21].
Statistical analysis
We conducted the analyses according to the CDC guidelines for analysis of complex NHANES data, accounting for the masked variance and using the proposed weighting methodology [22]. We computed seasonal-adjusted serum 25(OH)D levels using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). 25(OH)D was adjusted by season of examination. Continuous levels of 25(OH)D per 1 ng/ml higher value were used for our analysis.To determine any association between serum vitamin D and TL, we used progressively adjusted multivariable linear regression models. Our primary model adjusted for sex, race, education, marital status, and C-reactive protein (CRP). In a second model, we additionally adjusted for body mass index (BMI), smoking, and physical activity. Groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and χ2 tests. All tests were two sided, and p < 0.05 was the level of significance. Results were analyzed using SPSS complex sample module version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Sample weights were applied to account for unequal probabilities of selection, nonresponse bias, and oversampling.
Results
Of the 4347 eligible participants, 47.0% (n = 2045) were men. The mean age was 42.7 years overall, 49.2 years in men and 42.5 years in women (p = 0.060). With regard to education, 48.9% (n = 1879) of the participants had completed more than high school, 23.6% (n = 910) had completed high school, while 27.5% (n = 1055) had completed less than high school.Whites (non-Hispanic) represented 50.5% (n = 2196) of the participants, blacks represented 18.9% (n = 820) and Mexican-Americans represented 23.0% (n = 1001). With regard to marital status, 52.3% (n = 2275) were married, 6.4% (n = 277) were widowed and 6.9% (n = 301) divorced. Mean and standard deviation of the 25(OH)D were for the overall population 23.3 ±8.8 ng/ml, for men 23.4 ±8.0 ng/ml and for women 23.3 ±9.4 ng/ml. A total of 38.2% of the population had 25(OH)D deficiency (defined as 25(OH)D levels < 20 ng/ml). Mean BMI was 27.5 ±6.1 kg/m2 overall, 27.1 ±5.4 kg/m2 in men and 27.8 ±6.6 kg/m2 in women. In total, 20.4% were current smokers including 24.6% of men and 16.6% of women.Table I shows the seasonal adjusted mean vitamin D by quartiles of telomere length. There was no significant trend in mean 25(OH)D across quartiles of the TL (all p > 0.05). In linear regression models adjusted for age, race, marital status, education, and CRP, overall and stratified by sex, we found a statistically significant association between vitamin D and TL in the overall sample (β coefficient 0.045 (95% CI: 0.032 to 0.059)), driven by a positive and significant association in women (0.054 (0.043 to 0.064)), and in men (0.036 (0.020 to 0.052)), with no evidence of statistical interaction by sex (interaction p = 0.231). However, after we further adjusted for the previous covariates (age, race, marital status, education, and CRP) plus smoking, BMI and physical activity, no significant association was found in the overall sample (–0.026 (–3.16, 1.67)), in men (–0.016 (–3.72, 2.64)), or in women (–0.052 (–6.85, –2.26)).
Table I
Seasonal-adjusted mean of serum vitamin D levels across quartiles of telomere length stratified by sex
Variables
Quarters of telomere length
P-valuea
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
N
878
888
890
876
TL, mean ± SE (T/S ratio)
0.78 ±0.08
0.97 ±0.04
1.12 ±0.05
1.43 ±0.21
25(OH)D [ng/ml]
Total (n = 4987)
23.1 ±0.2
27.3 ±0.31
26.1 ±2.8
25.7 ±2.0
0.892
Men (n = 2319)
23.5 ±0.32
25.8 ±0.11
23.7 ±0.39
23.8 ±0.41
0.771
Women (n = 2668)
23.1 ±0.4
26.1 ±2.1
25.8 ±2.2
25.5 ±2.2
0.898
P-values for linear trend across quartiles of telomere length. Variables were compared across quartiles of telomere length using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.
Seasonal-adjusted mean of serum vitamin D levels across quartiles of telomere length stratified by sexP-values for linear trend across quartiles of telomere length. Variables were compared across quartiles of telomere length using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.
Discussion
In this study we aimed to determine the relationship between serum 25(OH)D and TL in US adults. To our knowledge this study is the largest population-based study to examine this issue in adults across a broad age range (age: 18–80) who were free of any history of diabetes, coronary heart disease, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke or congestive heart failure, and in both men and women. Our results revealed an association between 25(OH)D levels and TL in limited-adjusted models, suggesting a possible role of 25(OH)D status in the maintenance of TL.Our study findings are in line with several other published studies [16, 23]. In a study of 2,160 adult twin women in the United Kingdom, 25(OH)D levels were positively associated with TL [23]. In a study of 1,337 registered female nurses in the United States, Liu et al. [16] also reported a positive association of 25(OH)D with TL. However, in contrast, there have been several studies that have failed to find any association between 25(OH)D and TL. In a recent study by Liu et al. [17] among 1154 US radiologic technologists aged 48–93 years old, little evidence was found in support of the association of vitamin D and TL. This could be attributed to the older age of the participants (mean age: 63.2), in comparison with our studies and others that have reported significant associations. However, no associations of 25(OH)D and LTL were found in a sample of male health professionals [24] or in another study of young adults (at age 31) from Finland [25]. Thus, the role of vitamin D in TL remains inconclusive.There are potential mechanisms that could explain an association between TL and vitamin D concentrations. Activated vitamin D decreases the mediators of systemic inflammation, such as interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor-α [26]. Vitamin D receptors are ubiquitously expressed on T and B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and monocytes [27, 28], and through the down-regulation of cytokines and other pro-inflammatory factors, activated vitamin D exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative actions, which would affect the turnover rate of leukocytes [29]. It follows that vitamin D would attenuate the rate of TL attrition. Inflammation and oxidative stress are key determinants in the biology of aging [30], and TL dynamics appear to be influenced by the accruing burden of these characteristics [31].It has been suggested that TL may serve as a cumulative index of an individual’s lifelong burden of oxidative stress and inflammation [31]. Some of the factors that heighten oxidative stress and inflammation are genetic, but others are clearly environmental in nature, and a few may be easily modifiable. For instance, cigarette smoking [5, 32], obesity [5], and sedentary lifestyle [4] are associated with shortened TL. Whereas these lifestyle habits may be difficult to change, vitamin D concentrations are easily modifiable through nutritional supplementation or sunshine exposure. Our results found that after further adjustment for smoking, BMI and physical activity, there was no longer a statistically significant association between TL and 25(OH)D.The findings from our study have to considered in the context of some study limitations. The cross-sectional nature does not allow inference about causality; it is possible there is reverse causation where individuals in poorer health do less outdoor physical activity and thus have lower 25(OH)D levels. Unfortunately, we did not have available any repeated measure of TL with quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the same subjects after several follow-up years to elucidate temporality of these findings.The clinical relevance of the difference in relative TL is also not known. The age of the subjects could have influenced the results, even though the data were adjusted for age. The RIA was used for this NHANES survey, but it is not the current gold standard of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Moreover, 25(OH)D was measured at one time point, which may not reflect the lifetime vitamin D status, and there might be unmeasured confounders. NHANES measured 25(OH)D levels, which are felt to be the best marker of vitamin D stores, but it is activated vitamin D (or calcitriol) that binds to the vitamin D receptor and is thought to confer all the biological health effects. More studies are needed to replicate the results.Understanding the interplay between vitamin D and TL is a necessary and important step toward any application of the resulting knowledge for public health policy and action. Our study provides a comprehensive snapshot of the relationship of 25(OH)D with TL at the national level in the US.In conclusion, our findings support a possible positive association between 25(OH)D levels and telomere length; however, our results indicate that sedentary lifestyle and obesity may be crucial factors in any associations between 25(OH)D and TL. The implications of this association deserve further investigation.
Authors: H Zhu; D Guo; K Li; J Pedersen-White; I S Stallmann-Jorgensen; Y Huang; S Parikh; K Liu; Y Dong Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Klelia D Salpea; Philippa J Talmud; Jackie A Cooper; Cecilia G Maubaret; Jeffrey W Stephens; Kavin Abelak; Steve E Humphries Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Annamari Kilkkinen; Paul Knekt; Antti Aro; Harri Rissanen; Jukka Marniemi; Markku Heliövaara; Olli Impivaara; Antti Reunanen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jason J Liu; Jennifer Prescott; Edward Giovannucci; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard Rosner; Jiali Han; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mohsen Mazidi; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Abbas Dehghan; Jacek Jóźwiak; Adrian Covic; Naveed Sattar; Maciej Banach Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Mohsen Mazidi; Andre Pascal Kengne; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Peter P Toth; Kausik K Ray; Maciej Banach Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Mohsen Mazidi; Hong-Kai Gao; Nitin Shivappa; Michael D Wirth; James R Hebert; Andre Pascal Kengne Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 3.876