Literature DB >> 28140380

Near real-time automated dose restoration in IMPT to compensate for daily tissue density variations in prostate cancer.

Thyrza Jagt1, Sebastiaan Breedveld, Steven van de Water, Ben Heijmen, Mischa Hoogeman.   

Abstract

Proton therapy is very sensitive to daily density changes along the pencil beam paths. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate an automated method for adaptation of IMPT plans to compensate for these daily tissue density variations. A two-step restoration method for 'densities-of-the-day' was created: (1) restoration of spot positions (Bragg peaks) by adapting the energy of each pencil beam to the new water equivalent path length; and (2) re-optimization of pencil beam weights by minimizing the dosimetric difference with the planned dose distribution, using a fast and exact quadratic solver. The method was developed and evaluated using 8-10 repeat CT scans of 10 prostate cancer patients. Experiments demonstrated that giving a high weight to the PTV in the re-optimization resulted in clinically acceptable restorations. For all scans we obtained V 95%  ⩾  98% and V 107%  ⩽  2%. For the bladder, the differences between the restored and the intended treatment plan were below  +2 Gy and  +2%-point. The rectum differences were below  +2 Gy and  +2%-point for 90% of the scans. In the remaining scans the rectum was filled with air, which partly overlapped with the PTV. The air cavity distorted the Bragg peak resulting in less favorable rectum doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28140380     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5c12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

Review 1.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Are simple verbal instructions sufficient to ensure that bladder volume does not deteriorate prostate position reproducibility during spot scanning proton therapy?

Authors:  Kentaro Nishioka; Kento Gotoh; Takayuki Hashimoto; Takashige Abe; Takahiro Osawa; Ryuji Matsumoto; Isao Yokota; Norio Katoh; Rumiko Kinoshita; Koichi Yasuda; Toshiaki Yakabe; Takaaki Yoshimura; Seishin Takao; Nobuo Shinohara; Hidefumi Aoyama; Shinichi Shimizu; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-11-11

4.  Online adaptive dose restoration in intensity modulated proton therapy of lung cancer to account for inter-fractional density changes.

Authors:  Elena Borderías Villarroel; Xavier Geets; Edmond Sterpin
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-13

5.  Dosimetric Uncertainties in Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion Simultaneous Boost Using Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang; Chih-Wei Chang; Sibo Tian; Tonghe Wang; Liyong Lin; Yinan Wang; James Robert Janopaul-Naylor; Pretesh Patel; John D Demoor; Duncan Bohannon; Alex Stanforth; Bree Eaton; Mark W McDonald; Tian Liu; Sagar Anil Patel
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Clinical implementation and validation of an automated adaptive workflow for proton therapy.

Authors:  Vicki Trier Taasti; Colien Hazelaar; Femke Vaassen; Ana Vaniqui; Karolien Verhoeven; Frank Hoebers; Wouter van Elmpt; Richard Canters; Mirko Unipan
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-27

Review 7.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.