Literature DB >> 28139318

Cochlear duct length-one size fits all?

J F Thong1, D Low2, A Tham3, C Liew3, T Y Tan3, H W Yuen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to investigate for gender and racial variations in the basal turn length of the human cochlea in an Asian population.
METHOD: HRCT temporal bone data from year 1997 till 2012 of patients with normally developed cochleae who reported with otologic disease was obtained. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears. The largest distance from the midpoint of the round window, through the midmodiolar axis, to the lateral wall was measured (distance A). Length of the lateral wall of the cochlea to the first turn (360°) was calculated and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: HRCT temporal bone data from 161 patients was initially obtained. Four patients were subsequently excluded from the study as they were of various other racial groups. Study group therefore comprised of 157 patients (314 cochleae). Mean distance A was statistically different between the two sides of the ear (right 9.09mm; left 9.06mm; p=0.0069). Significant gender and racial differences were also found. Mean distance A was 9.17mm in males and 8.97mm in females (p=0.0016). The racial groups were Chinese (39%), Malay (38%) and Indian (22%). Between racial groups, mean distance A was 9.11mm (Chinese), 9.11mm (Malays) and 8.99mm (Indians). The mean basal turn lengths ranged from 19.71mm to 25.09mm. With gender factored in, significant variation in mean basal turn lengths was found across all three racial groups (p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: The view of the basal turn of the cochlea from HRCT is simple to obtain and reproducible. This study found significant differences in basal cochlear length amongst male and female Asian patients, as well as amongst various racial groups. This has implications for cochlear electrode insertion as well as electrode array design.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28139318     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  10 in total

1.  Early Hearing Preservation Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation With New Slim Lateral Wall Electrode Using Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Abhinav Ettyreddy; Shannon M Lefler; Pawina Jiramongkolchai; Cameron C Wick; Nedim Durakovic; Craig A Buchman; Jacques A Herzog
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  Yubo Fan; Dongqing Zhang; Rueben Banalagay; Jianing Wang; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-11-24

3.  Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Alexander Hardy; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-19

4.  Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin Eser; Başak Atalay; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Determination of Cochlear Duct Length With 3D Versus Two-dimensional Methods: A Retrospective Clinical Study of Imaging by Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Stephan Waldeck; Christian VON Falck; Rene Chapot; Marc Brockmann; Daniel Overhoff
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Comparison of cochlear duct length between the Saudi and non-Saudi populations.

Authors:  Alaa Alanazi; Farid Alzhrani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

7.  Variations in the Size and Shape of Human Cochlear Malformation Types.

Authors:  Anandhan Dhanasingh
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  A novel cochlear measurement that predicts inner-ear malformation.

Authors:  Tawfiq Khurayzi; Fida Almuhawas; Abdulrahman Alsanosi; Yassin Abdelsamad; Úna Doyle; Anandhan Dhanasingh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Is Characteristic Frequency Limiting Real-Time Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation?

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Shannon M Lefler; Dorina Kallogjeri; Cameron C Wick; Timothy A Holden; Nedim Durakovic; Amanda J Ortmann; Jacques A Herzog; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

10.  Variation of the cochlear anatomy and cochlea duct length: analysis with a new tablet-based software.

Authors:  Judith E Spiro; Joachim Müller; Jennifer L Spiegel; Daniel Polterauer; John-Martin Hempel; Martin Canis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.503

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.