Literature DB >> 28138816

Cardiac MOLLI T1 mapping at 3.0 T: comparison of patient-adaptive dual-source RF and conventional RF transmission.

Michael Rasper1, Jonathan Nadjiri2, Alexandra S Sträter2, Marcus Settles2, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz3, Ernst J Rummeny2, Armin M Huber2.   

Abstract

To prospectively compare image quality and myocardial T1 relaxation times of modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) imaging at 3.0 T (T) acquired with patient-adaptive dual-source (DS) and conventional single-source (SS) radiofrequency (RF) transmission. Pre- and post-contrast MOLLI T1 mapping using SS and DS was acquired in 27 patients. Patient wise and segment wise analysis of T1 times was performed. The correlation of DS MOLLI measurements with a reference spin echo sequence was analysed in phantom experiments. DS MOLLI imaging reduced T1 standard deviation in 14 out of 16 myocardial segments (87.5%). Significant reduction of T1 variance could be obtained in 7 segments (43.8%). DS significantly reduced myocardial T1 variance in 16 out of 25 patients (64.0%). With conventional RF transmission, dielectric shading artefacts occurred in six patients causing diagnostic uncertainty. No according artefacts were found on DS images. DS image findings were in accordance with conventional T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Phantom experiments demonstrated good correlation of myocardial T1 time between DS MOLLI and spin echo imaging. Dual-source RF transmission enhances myocardial T1 homogeneity in MOLLI imaging at 3.0 T. The reduction of signal inhomogeneities and artefacts due to dielectric shading is likely to enhance diagnostic confidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3 T; Cardiac T1 mapping; Dual-source RF transmission; MOLLI; RF shimming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28138816     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1072-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  30 in total

1.  Analysis of the Look-Locker T(1) mapping sequence in dynamic contrast uptake studies: simulation and in vivo validation.

Authors:  M Karlsson; B Nordell
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Ralph Noeske; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Roland Felix; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Dual-source radiofrequency transmission with patient-adaptive local radiofrequency shimming for 3.0-T cardiac MR imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Andreas Mueller; Marc Kouwenhoven; Claas P Naehle; Juergen Gieseke; Katharina Strach; Winfried A Willinek; Hans H Schild; Daniel Thomas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Kyunghyun Sung; Bruce L Daniel; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Dual-source parallel RF transmission for clinical MR imaging of the spine at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison with conventional single-source transmission.

Authors:  Michael Nelles; Roy S König; Jürgen Gieseke; Marjolijn M Guerand-van Battum; Guido M Kukuk; Hans H Schild; Winfried A Willinek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Alicia Maria Maceira; Jayshree Joshi; Sanjay Kumar Prasad; James Charles Moon; Enrica Perugini; Idris Harding; Mary Noelle Sheppard; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Philip Nigel Hawkins; Dudley John Pennell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping.

Authors:  Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  T1 mapping of the myocardium: intra-individual assessment of post-contrast T1 time evolution and extracellular volume fraction at 3T for Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel; Marcelo Nacif; Anna Zavodni; Jacquin Jones; Songtao Liu; Christopher T Sibley; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners.

Authors:  Fabio S Raman; Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Neville Gai; Melanie Freed; Jing Han; Chia-Ying Liu; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke; Songtao Liu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.