Literature DB >> 20173100

Joint modeling of intercourse behavior and human fecundability using structural equation models.

Sungduk Kim1, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Germaine M Buck Louis.   

Abstract

Human fecundability is defined as the probability of conception during a menstrual cycle among couples at risk for pregnancy. It is highly relevant for understanding human reproduction and represents a series of highly interrelated and timed processes. The statistical literature has recognized the need to incorporate both biological and behavioral factors (Barrett and Marshall, 1969; Dunson and Stanford, 2005) when modeling conception probabilities, given that intercourse during the fertile window is a necessary but not sufficient criterion for conception. The heterogeneity of behaviors such as the timing and frequency of intercourse in a menstrual cycle needs to be considered when estimating conception. Here we propose a joint model of intercourse behavior and human fecundability through a classic conception probability model and a structural equation model (SEM) to accommodate intercourse during the menstrual cycle. The SEM part of the proposed model allows the dependency between intercourse behaviors on consecutive days in a menstrual cycle to vary across days. Consequently, the proposed model can accommodate not only a broad variety of intercourse patterns and dependency structures but also general covariate effects. Finally, we present a detailed analysis of the New York State Angler Cohort Prospective Pregnancy Study to illustrate the proposed methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173100      PMCID: PMC2912701          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  16 in total

1.  Factor analytic models of clustered multivariate data with informative censoring.

Authors:  D B Dunson; S D Perreault
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation.

Authors:  D B Dunson; C R Weinberg; D D Baird; J S Kesner; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Accounting for unreported and missing intercourse in human fertility studies.

Authors:  D B Dunson; C R Weinberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of Ova.

Authors:  D Schwartz; P D Macdonald; V Heuchel
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1980-07

5.  Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples.

Authors:  M J Keulers; C J C M Hamilton; A Franx; J L H Evers; R S G M Bots
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  A discrete survival model with random effects: an application to time to pregnancy.

Authors:  T H Scheike; T K Jensen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; B C Gladen; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; Donna Day Baird; David B Dunson; D Robert McConnaughey; James S Kesner; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Polychlorinated biphenyl serum concentrations, lifestyle and time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J Dmochowski; C Lynch; P Kostyniak; B M McGuinness; J E Vena
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Estimating the effectiveness in HIV prevention trials by incorporating the exposure process: application to HPTN 035 data.

Authors:  Jingyang Zhang; Elizabeth R Brown
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Joint modeling of time-varying HIV exposure and infection for estimation of per-act efficacy in HIV prevention trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Clara P Dominguez Islas; Jingyang Zhang
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.