Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón1, Audrey J Gaskins. 1. aDepartment of Environmental Health bDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health cChanning Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have been known for their ability to interfere with aspects of hormone action resulting in adverse health consequences among animals and humans; however, the effects of EDCs on human fecundity have shown inconsistent findings. This review summarizes the most recent epidemiologic literature from humans on the potential effects of female exposure to nonpersistent EDCs, specifically bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, parabens, and triclosan, on fecundity, measured by markers of reproductive hormones, markers of ovulation or ovarian reserve, IVF outcomes, and time-to-pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the epidemiologic literature on this topic is growing, the evidence supporting an association between female urinary concentrations of BPA, phthalates, parabens and triclosan, and fecundity remains unclear. The heterogeneous results could be due to methodological differences in recruitment populations (fertile vs. subfertile), study designs (prospective vs. retrospective), assessment of exposure (including differences in the number and timing of urine samples and differences in the analytical methods used to assess the urinary concentrations), residual confounding due to diet or other lifestyle factors, and coexposures to other chemicals. SUMMARY: At present, there is limited evidence to conclude that female exposure to nonpersistent EDCs affect fecundity in humans. Further studies focusing on exposure to mixtures of EDCs are needed.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have been known for their ability to interfere with aspects of hormone action resulting in adverse health consequences among animals and humans; however, the effects of EDCs on human fecundity have shown inconsistent findings. This review summarizes the most recent epidemiologic literature from humans on the potential effects of female exposure to nonpersistent EDCs, specifically bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, parabens, and triclosan, on fecundity, measured by markers of reproductive hormones, markers of ovulation or ovarian reserve, IVF outcomes, and time-to-pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the epidemiologic literature on this topic is growing, the evidence supporting an association between female urinary concentrations of BPA, phthalates, parabens and triclosan, and fecundity remains unclear. The heterogeneous results could be due to methodological differences in recruitment populations (fertile vs. subfertile), study designs (prospective vs. retrospective), assessment of exposure (including differences in the number and timing of urine samples and differences in the analytical methods used to assess the urinary concentrations), residual confounding due to diet or other lifestyle factors, and coexposures to other chemicals. SUMMARY: At present, there is limited evidence to conclude that female exposure to nonpersistent EDCs affect fecundity in humans. Further studies focusing on exposure to mixtures of EDCs are needed.
Authors: Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Jayne V Brian; Catherine A Harris; Martin Scholze; Thomas Backhaus; Petra Booy; Marja Lamoree; Giulio Pojana; Niels Jonkers; Tamsin Runnalls; Angela Bonfà; Antonio Marcomini; John P Sumpter Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Manori J Silva; Dana B Barr; John A Reidy; Nicole A Malek; Carolyn C Hodge; Samuel P Caudill; John W Brock; Larry L Needham; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Sarah W Curtis; Dawayland O Cobb; Varun Kilaru; Metrecia L Terrell; M Elizabeth Marder; Dana Boyd Barr; Carmen J Marsit; Michele Marcus; Karen N Conneely; Alicia K Smith Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Ronit Machtinger; Audrey J Gaskins; Catherine Racowsky; Abdallah Mansur; Michal Adir; Andrea A Baccarelli; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Carmen Messerlian; Andrea Bellavia; Audrey J Gaskins; Yu-Han Chiu; Jennifer B Ford; Alexandra R Azevedo; John C Petrozza; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Paige L Williams Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Herman Autrup; Frank A Barile; Sir Colin Berry; Bas J Blaauboer; Alan Boobis; Herrmann Bolt; Christopher J Borgert; Wolfgang Dekant; Daniel Dietrich; Jose L Domingo; Gio Batta Gori; Helmut Greim; Jan Hengstler; Sam Kacew; Hans Marquardt; Olavi Pelkonen; Kai Savolainen; Pat Heslop-Harrison; Nico P Vermeulen Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 5.153