Literature DB >> 21042932

Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials.

Gunter von Minckwitz1, Michael Untch, Eveline Nüesch, Sibylle Loibl, Manfred Kaufmann, Sherko Kümmel, Peter A Fasching, Wolfgang Eiermann, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Serban Dan Costa, Keyur Mehta, Jörn Hilfrich, Christian Jackisch, Bernd Gerber, Andreas du Bois, Jens Huober, Claus Hanusch, Gottfried Konecny, Werner Fett, Elmar Stickeler, Nadia Harbeck, Volkmar Müller, Peter Jüni.   

Abstract

Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment correlates with outcome in breast cancer. We determined whether characteristics of neoadjuvant therapy are associated with pCR. We used multi-level models, which accounted for heterogeneity in pCR across trials and trial arms, to analyze individual patient data from 3332 women included in 7 German neoadjuvant trials with uniform protocols. PCR was associated with an increase in number of chemotherapy cycles (odds ratio [OR] 1.2 for every two additional cycles; P = 0.009), with higher cumulative anthracycline doses (OR 1.6; P = 0.002), higher cumulative taxane doses (OR 1.6; P = 0.009), and with capecitabine containing regimens (OR 1.62; P = 0.022). Association of pCR with increase in number of cycles appeared more pronounced in hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors (OR 1.35) than in HR-negative tumors (OR 1.04; P for interaction = 0.046). Effect of anthracycline dose was particularly pronounced in HER2-negative tumors (OR 1.61), compared to HER2-positive tumors (OR 0.83; P for interaction = 0.14). Simultaneous trastuzumab treatment in HER2-positive tumors increased odds of pCR 3.2-fold (P < 0.001). No association of pCR and number of trastuzumab cycles was found (OR 1.20, P = 0.39). Dosing characteristics appear important for successful treatment of breast cancer. Longer treatment, higher cumulative doses of anthracyclines and taxanes, and the addition of capecitabine and trastuzumab are associated with better response. Tailoring according to breast cancer phenotype might be possible: longer treatment in HR-positive tumors, higher cumulative anthracycline doses for HER2-negative tumors, shorter treatment at higher cumulative doses for triple-negative tumors, and limited number of preoperative trastuzumab cycles in HER2-positive tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21042932     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1228-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  78 in total

1.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

2.  AGO Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Update 2011.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Anton Scharl; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Controversies concerning the use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Manfred Kaufmann; Thomas Karn; Eugen Ruckhäberle
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Breast cancer: Neoadjuvant bevacizumab treatment-signal or noise?

Authors:  Harold J Burstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  [Prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results of a combined analysis from NSABP B-18 and B-27].

Authors:  D Krug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-background for the indication of locoregional treatment.

Authors:  David Krug; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederik Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics analysis for prediction of breast cancers insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qianqian Xiong; Xuezhi Zhou; Zhenyu Liu; Chuqian Lei; Ciqiu Yang; Mei Yang; Liulu Zhang; Teng Zhu; Xiaosheng Zhuang; Changhong Liang; Zaiyi Liu; Jie Tian; Kun Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Neoadjuvant clinical trials for the treatment of primary breast cancer: the experience of the German study groups.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl; Gottfried E Konecny; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Pathological Response in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cohort Treated with Neoadjuvant Carboplatin and Docetaxel According to Lehmann's Refined Classification.

Authors:  Isabel Echavarria; Sara López-Tarruella; Antoni Picornell; Jose Ángel García-Saenz; Yolanda Jerez; Katherine Hoadley; Henry L Gómez; Fernando Moreno; María Del Monte-Millan; Iván Márquez-Rodas; Enrique Alvarez; Rocío Ramos-Medina; Javier Gayarre; Tatiana Massarrah; Inmaculada Ocaña; María Cebollero; Hugo Fuentes; Agusti Barnadas; Ana Isabel Ballesteros; Uriel Bohn; Charles M Perou; Miguel Martin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.