Denalee O'Malley1,2, Asa A Dewan3, Pamela A Ohman-Strickland3,4, Daniel A Gundersen5, Suzanne M Miller6, Shawna V Hudson1,4. 1. Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 2. School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 3. School of Public Health, Biostatistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 4. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 5. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient activation-the knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage one's health-is associated with improved self-management behaviors for several chronic conditions. This study assesses rates of patient activation in breast and prostate cancer survivors and explores the characteristics associated with patient activation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of survivors with localized (Stage I or II) breast and prostate cancers who were post-treatment (between 1-10+ years) were recruited from 4 community hospital sites in New Jersey. Survey data on patient characteristics (demographic and psychosocial) and clinical factors were assessed to explore the relationships with patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure-13. RESULTS: Among 325 survivors (112 prostate; 213 breast), overall patient activation was high (M = 3.25). Activation was significantly lower among prostate survivors when compared with breast cancer survivors (M = 3.25 [SD, 0.38] vs M = 3.34 [SD, 0.37], P<.05). For prostate survivors, race (P < .05), marital status (P < .001), employment status (P < .01), household income (P < .05), and fear of recurrence (P < .01) were significantly associated with patient activation. For both groups, ease of access to oncology team and primary care physicians (PCPs) (all P values < .001) and perceptions of time spent with oncologists' team and PCPs (all P values < .01) were positive predictors of activation. CONCLUSIONS: In both breast and prostate survivors, access to providers (both PCPs and oncologists) and perception that adequate time spent with providers were associated with activation. Therefore, clinical interventions maybe a promising avenue to improve patient activation. Research is needed to develop and test tailored patient activation interventions to improve self-management among cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND:Patient activation-the knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage one's health-is associated with improved self-management behaviors for several chronic conditions. This study assesses rates of patient activation in breast and prostate cancer survivors and explores the characteristics associated with patient activation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of survivors with localized (Stage I or II) breast and prostate cancers who were post-treatment (between 1-10+ years) were recruited from 4 community hospital sites in New Jersey. Survey data on patient characteristics (demographic and psychosocial) and clinical factors were assessed to explore the relationships with patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure-13. RESULTS: Among 325 survivors (112 prostate; 213 breast), overall patient activation was high (M = 3.25). Activation was significantly lower among prostate survivors when compared with breast cancer survivors (M = 3.25 [SD, 0.38] vs M = 3.34 [SD, 0.37], P<.05). For prostate survivors, race (P < .05), marital status (P < .001), employment status (P < .01), household income (P < .05), and fear of recurrence (P < .01) were significantly associated with patient activation. For both groups, ease of access to oncology team and primary care physicians (PCPs) (all P values < .001) and perceptions of time spent with oncologists' team and PCPs (all P values < .01) were positive predictors of activation. CONCLUSIONS: In both breast and prostate survivors, access to providers (both PCPs and oncologists) and perception that adequate time spent with providers were associated with activation. Therefore, clinical interventions maybe a promising avenue to improve patient activation. Research is needed to develop and test tailored patient activation interventions to improve self-management among cancer survivors.
Authors: T Kuehn; W Klauss; M Darsow; S Regele; F Flock; C Maiterth; R Dahlbender; I Wendt; R Kreienberg Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jordan A Holmes; Jeannette T Bensen; James L Mohler; Lixin Song; Merle H Mishel; Ronald C Chen Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Leonard L Berry; Janet Turner Parish; Ramkumar Janakiraman; Lee Ogburn-Russell; Glen R Couchman; William L Rayburn; Jedidiah Grisel Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Nynke Holwerda; Robbert Sanderman; Grieteke Pool; Chris Hinnen; Johannes A Langendijk; Willem A Bemelman; Mariët Hagedoorn; Mirjam A G Sprangers Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Kimberly J Rask; David C Ziemer; Susan A Kohler; Jonathan N Hawley; Folakemi J Arinde; Catherine S Barnes Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Edward L Barnes; Millie D Long; Michael D Kappelman; Christopher F Martin; Robert S Sandler Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Denalee M O'Malley; Stacy N Davis; Rahwana Amare; Bianca Sanabria; Brittany Sullivan; Katie A Devine; Jeanne M Ferrante; Patricia A Findley; Suzanne M Miller; Shawna V Hudson Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 1.771