Literature DB >> 11200778

Long-term morbidity following axillary dissection in breast cancer patients--clinical assessment, significance for life quality and the impact of demographic, oncologic and therapeutic factors.

T Kuehn1, W Klauss, M Darsow, S Regele, F Flock, C Maiterth, R Dahlbender, I Wendt, R Kreienberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study describes in detail the surgery-related symptoms following axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients and considers both their significance for long term quality of life and the impact of possible influencing factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and ninety six patients were studied retrospectively using a self-report questionnaire and a clinical examination. The symptoms, numbness, pain, edema, arm strength and mobility were evaluated. The subjective assessment of the degree of symptom intensity was compared with objective measurements. The extent of surgery (number of resected nodes, level of dissection) as well as the influence of demographic, oncologic and adjuvant measures (age, time interval, number of involved nodes, chemotherapy) were evaluated.
RESULTS: Shoulder-arm morbidity and fear of cancer recurrence were the most important long-term sources of distress following breast cancer surgery in our study population. Demographic, oncologic and therapeutic measures including the extent of surgery had no influence on long-term morbidity. The intensity of all evaluated symptoms was reported to be more severe in patients' subjective statements than in the results of clinical assessment.
CONCLUSION: Shoulder-arm morbidity following axillary dissection is a frustrating polysymptomatic disease that seems to be relatively unaffected by therapeutic measures. The surgical trauma necessary for adequate tumor staging (removal of 10 lymph nodes) seems decisive for the postsurgery syndrome following axillary dissection. For node-positive patients complete axillary clearing may improve tumor control without worsening long-termmorbidity. New techniques, such as the sentinel-node-biopsy, that selects patients with negative axillary status while preserving the integrity of axillary structures, may improve the overall morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200778     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026564723698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  46 in total

1.  Perceptions of upper-body problems during recovery from breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Louisa G Collins; Robyn Nash; Tracey Round; Beth Newman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Lymph node ratio is more valuable than level III involvement for prediction of outcome in node-positive breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Emin Yildirim; Ugur Berberoglu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Sandra A Norman; A Russell Localio; Michael J Kallan; Anita L Weber; Heather A Simoes Torpey; Sheryl L Potashnik; Linda T Miller; Kevin R Fox; Angela DeMichele; Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  SPECT-CT: a valuable method to document the regeneration of lymphatics and autotransplanted lymph node fragments.

Authors:  K S Blum; C Radtke; W H Knapp; R Pabst; K F Gratz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Survivors of primary breast cancer 5 years after surgery: follow-up care, long-term problems, and treatment regrets. Results of the prospective BRENDA II-study.

Authors:  Elena Leinert; Rolf Kreienberg; Achim Wöckel; Thorsten Kühn; Felix Flock; Ricardo Felberbaum; Wolfgang Janni; Kathy Taylor; Susanne Singer; Lukas Schwentner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants.

Authors:  Shana Harrington; Darin Padua; Claudio Battaglini; Lori A Michener; Carol Giuliani; Joseph Myers; Diane Groff
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Risk of decline in upper-body function and symptoms among older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jennifer L Westrup; Timothy L Lash; Soe Soe Thwin; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The health of women treated for breast cancer: A challenge in primary care.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Arleen Chan; Jaco Loriet; Shohreh Razmi
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-06-30

9.  Upper-body morbidity following breast cancer treatment is common, may persist longer-term and adversely influences quality of life.

Authors:  Sandra C Hayes; Sheree Rye; Diana Battistutta; Tracey DiSipio; Beth Newman
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Comparison of quality of life, satisfaction with surgery and shoulder-arm morbidity in breast cancer survivors submitted to breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Renata Freitas-Silva; Délio Marques Conde; Ruffo de Freitas-Júnior; Edson Zangiacomi Martinez
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.