Kimberly J Rask1, David C Ziemer2, Susan A Kohler1, Jonathan N Hawley1, Folakemi J Arinde3, Catherine S Barnes2. 1. The Emory Center on Health Outcomes and Quality, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Rask, Ms Kohler, Mr Hawley) 2. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Ziemer, Dr Barnes) 3. International Association of National Public Health Institutes, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Arinde)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the patient activation construct as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) survey by correlating PAM scores with diabetes self-management behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge in a predominantly minority and uninsured population. METHODS: A convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban public hospital diabetes clinic was surveyed and contacted by phone 6 months later. The survey included questions about activation, health behaviors, and health care utilization. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients agreed to participate. Most were African American, female, and uninsured. Most respondents (62.2%) scored in the highest category of activation according to the PAM. Activated patients were more likely to perform feet checks, receive eye examinations, and exercise regularly. Activation was consistently associated with less reported difficulty in managing diabetes care but not with A1C knowledge. PAM scores at the initial interview were highly correlated with scores at 6-month follow-up. Activation level did not predict differences in health care utilization during the 6 months following the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Higher scores on the PAM were associated with higher rates of self-care behaviors and ease in managing diabetes; however, the indigent urban population reported higher activation scores than found in previous studies. The relationship between activation and outcomes needs to be explored further prior to expanding use of this measure in this patient population.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the patient activation construct as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) survey by correlating PAM scores with diabetes self-management behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge in a predominantly minority and uninsured population. METHODS: A convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban public hospital diabetes clinic was surveyed and contacted by phone 6 months later. The survey included questions about activation, health behaviors, and health care utilization. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients agreed to participate. Most were African American, female, and uninsured. Most respondents (62.2%) scored in the highest category of activation according to the PAM. Activated patients were more likely to perform feet checks, receive eye examinations, and exercise regularly. Activation was consistently associated with less reported difficulty in managing diabetes care but not with A1C knowledge. PAM scores at the initial interview were highly correlated with scores at 6-month follow-up. Activation level did not predict differences in health care utilization during the 6 months following the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Higher scores on the PAM were associated with higher rates of self-care behaviors and ease in managing diabetes; however, the indigent urban population reported higher activation scores than found in previous studies. The relationship between activation and outcomes needs to be explored further prior to expanding use of this measure in this patient population.
Authors: Joseph D Shirk; Catherine M Crespi; Josemanuel D Saucedo; Sylvia Lambrechts; Ely Dahan; Robert Kaplan; Christopher Saigal Journal: Patient Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Brian W Pennarola; Angie Mae Rodday; Deborah K Mayer; Sara J Ratichek; Stella M Davies; Karen L Syrjala; Sunita Patel; Kristin Bingen; Mary Jo Kupst; Lisa Schwartz; Eva C Guinan; Judith H Hibbard; Susan K Parsons Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2011-12-26 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Denalee O'Malley; Asa A Dewan; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Daniel A Gundersen; Suzanne M Miller; Shawna V Hudson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Mona AuYoung; Ninez A Ponce; O Kenrik Duru; Arturo Vargas Bustamante; Carol M Mangione; Hector P Rodriguez Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2016-12
Authors: Robert G Nelson; V Shane Pankratz; Donica M Ghahate; Jeanette Bobelu; Thomas Faber; Vallabh O Shah Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 8.237