Literature DB >> 28133835

Cut-off value of nuchal translucency as indication for chromosomal microarray analysis.

I Maya1, S Yacobson1, S Kahana1, J Yeshaya1, T Tenne2, I Agmon-Fishman1, L Cohen-Vig1, M Shohat3,4, L Basel-Vanagaite1,3,5,6, R Sharony2,3,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: An association between isolated, increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and pathogenic findings on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been reported. A recent meta-analysis reported that most studies use a NT cut-off value of 3.5 mm. However, considering NT distribution and the commonly accepted 5% false-positive rate in maternal serum screening, NT cut-off levels should be reconsidered. The aim of this study was to assess different NT cut-off levels as indication for CMA and to determine whether CMA should be recommended for mildly increased NT of 3.0-3.4 mm.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of singleton pregnancies with CMA results and either normal NT and no other finding or with increased NT as the only medical indication for CMA at the time of an invasive procedure (increased NT was considered an isolated finding in cases of advanced maternal age). Women with normal fetal NT who underwent CMA did so at their own request. A single laboratory performed all genetic analyses. Comparative genomic hybridization microarray analysis or single nucleotide polymorphism array technology was used for CMA. If combined first-trimester screening (NT and biochemistry) indicated increased risk for common aneuploidies, the case was excluded. NT was used to divide cases into three groups (≤ 2.9 mm, 3.0-3.4 mm and ≥ 3.5 mm) and their CMA results were compared.
RESULTS: CMA results were recorded in 1588 pregnancies, among which 770 fetuses had either normal NT with no other finding or isolated increased NT. Of these, 462 had NT ≤ 2.9 mm, 170 had NT of 3.0-3.4 mm and 138 had NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Pathogenic copy number variants were found in 1.7%, 6.5% and 13.8% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that CMA should be recommended when fetuses have isolated, mildly increased NT (3.0-3.4 mm).
Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosomal microarray analysis; copy number variants; non-invasive prenatal testing; nuchal translucency; variants of unknown significance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28133835     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  14 in total

1.  Array study in fetuses with nuchal translucency above the 95th percentile: a 4-year observational single-centre study.

Authors:  Edgar Coello-Cahuao; María Ángeles Sánchez-Durán; Inés Calero; María Teresa Higueras; Mayte Avilés García; Carlota Rodó; Nerea Maiz; Alberto Plaja Rustein; Neus Castells-Sarret; Carmen Mediano-Vizuete; Elena Carreras
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Prenatal Invasive Testing at a Tertiary Referral Center in India: A Report of 433 Cases Under a Single Operator.

Authors:  Vandana Bansal; Rujul Jhaveri
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-06-08

3.  Prenatal Diagnostic Value of Chromosomal Microarray in Fetuses with Nuchal Translucency Greater than 2.5 mm.

Authors:  Zhu Zhang; Ting Hu; Jiamin Wang; Qinqin Li; He Wang; Shanling Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis in Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis.

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Billie R Lianoglou; Rebecca R Adami; Ilina D Pluym; Kerry Holliman; Jennifer Duffy; Sarah L Downum; Sachi Patel; Amanda Faubel; Nina M Boe; Nancy T Field; Aisling Murphy; Louise C Laurent; Jennifer Jolley; Cherry Uy; Anne M Slavotinek; Patrick Devine; Ugur Hodoglugil; Jessica Van Ziffle; Stephan J Sanders; Tippi C MacKenzie; Mary E Norton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Olav B Petersen; Eric Smith; Diane Van Opstal; Marike Polak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Karin E M Diderich; Caterina M Bilardo; Lidia R Arends; Ida Vogel; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Fetal nuchal translucency: is there an association with birthweight and neonatal wellbeing?

Authors:  Ziya Kalem; Aşkı Ellibeş Kaya; Batuhan Bakırarar; Müberra Namlı Kalem
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-27

7.  Clinical application of chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype.

Authors:  Linjuan Su; Hailong Huang; Gang An; Meiying Cai; Xiaoqing Wu; Ying Li; Xiaorui Xie; Yuan Lin; Meiying Wang; Liangpu Xu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  Is there still a role for nuchal translucency measurement in the changing paradigm of first trimester screening?

Authors:  Francesca Bardi; Pien Bosschieter; Joke Verheij; Attie Go; Monique Haak; Mireille Bekker; Esther Sikkel; Audrey Coumans; Eva Pajkrt; Caterina Bilardo
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Noninvasive prenatal testing for assessing foetal sex chromosome aneuploidy: a retrospective study of 45,773 cases.

Authors:  Xinran Lu; Chaohong Wang; Yuxiu Sun; Junxiang Tang; Keting Tong; Jiansheng Zhu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 10.  Chances and Challenges of New Genetic Screening Technologies (NIPT) in Prenatal Medicine from a Clinical Perspective: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ivonne Bedei; Aline Wolter; Axel Weber; Fabrizio Signore; Roland Axt-Fliedner
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.