| Literature DB >> 28132644 |
Shigenori Kanno1,2, Makoto Saito3, Tomohito Kashinoura3, Yoshiyuki Nishio3, Osamu Iizuka3, Hirokazu Kikuchi3, Masahito Takagi3, Masaki Iwasaki4, Shoki Takahashi5, Etsuro Mori3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to elucidate changes in cerebral white matter after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; Lumboperitoneal shunt; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt; White matter
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28132644 PMCID: PMC5278569 DOI: 10.1186/s12987-016-0048-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fluids Barriers CNS ISSN: 2045-8118
Demographics of patients at baseline
| Variables | INPH (n = 20) | INPH (n = 8) | df | p valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responder (SR) | Non-responder (SNR) | |||
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 75.5 (5.2) | 76.6 (3.9) | 26 | NS |
| Sex, female/male | 8/12 | 1/7 | 1 | 0.023 |
| Education years, mean (SD) | 10.4 (2.9) | 8.8 (3.2) | 26 | NS |
| CSF shunt placement (VP/LP) | 13/7 | 6/2 | 1 | NS |
| TUG, mean (SD) | ||||
| Time to complete (s) | 14.7 (4.1) | 15.6 (3.1) | 26 | NS |
| Number of steps | 21.9 (7.0) | 22.6 (4.0) | 26 | NS |
| iNPHGS, median (range) | ||||
| Gait disturbance | 2.0 (2–3) | 2.0 (1–4) | NS | |
| Cognitive disturbance | 3.0 (0–3) | 2.5 (1–3) | NS | |
| Urinary disturbance | 1.5 (0–3) | 2.0 (0–4) | NS | |
| Total | 6.5 (2–9) | 7.0 (4–9) | NS | |
| MMSE, mean (SD) | 21.5 (4.6) | 22.3 (5.1) | 26 | NS |
| FAB, mean (SD) | 10.7 (2.3) | 12.9 (3.1) | 26 | NS |
| Left VV/ICV ratio (%), mean (SD) | 8.29 (1.99) | 7.19 (1.64) | 26 | NS |
| Left hemispheric FA, mean (SD) | 0.386 (0.022) | 0.380 (0.024) | 26 | NS |
| Left hemispheric MD (×10−3 mm2/s), mean (SD) | 0.813 (0.036) | 0.829 (0.068) | 26 | NS |
INPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, iNPHGS idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus grading scale, VP ventriculoperitoneal, LP lumboperitoneal, TUG Timed “Up and GO” test, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, FAB frontal assessment battery, Left VV/ICV ratio the ratio of the volume of the left lateral ventricle + the cerebral aqueduct + the left side region of the third and fourth ventricles and the volume of the left half intracranial space, FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, SD standard deviation, df degrees of freedom, NS not significant
aPaired Student’s t test was used except for iNPHGS (Mann–Whitney U test)
bPearson’s Chi squared test was used for sex and CSF shunt placement ratios
Fig. 1Comparison of skeletons and mis-registrations observed in TBSS analysis. a Demonstrates the mean FA skeleton (green) derived from the study (the comparison between the patients with INPH and the healthy control subjects) and the FMRIB58 FA standard space skeleton (grey). The periventricular tracks in the mean FA skeleton (the internal capsules and the corpus callosum in particular) are out of position. b Shows a sample of mis-registration that occurred in the comparison of MD maps between the patients with INPH and the healthy control subjects. The back-projected voxels (red) in the columns, bodies, and crura of the bilateral fornixes were positioned on each side of the lateral ventricle, and those in a peri-Sylvian portion of the SWM of bilateral frontal operculums were on each side of the Sylvian fissure. A anterior, I inferior, L left, P posterior, S superior
Changes in clinical and MRI variables after shunt placement
| Variables | Baseline | Post-operative | df | p valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Shunt responders (SR, n = 20) | ||||
| TUG, mean (SD) | ||||
| Time to complete (s) | 14.7 (4.1) | 11.2 (4.3) | 19 | <0.001 |
| Number of steps | 21.9 (7.0) | 18.1 (7.2) | 19 | 0.001 |
| iNPHGS, median (range) | ||||
| Gait disturbance | 2.0 (2–3) | 1.0 (0–3) | <0.001 | |
| Cognitive disturbance | 3.0 (0–3) | 2.0 (0–3) | 0.001 | |
| Urinary disturbance | 1.5 (0–3) | 0.0 (0–2) | 0.004 | |
| Total | 6.5 (2–9) | 3.0 (1–7) | <0.001 | |
| MMSE, mean (SD) | 21.5 (4.6) | 24.0 (4.3) | 19 | 0.008 |
| FAB, mean (SD) | 10.7 (2.3) | 12.9 (3.1) | 19 | 0.002 |
| Left VV/ICV ratio (%), mean (SD) | 8.29 (1.99) | 6.59 (2.03) | 19 | <0.001 |
| Left hemispheric FA, mean (SD) | 0.386 (0.022) | 0.382 (0.026) | 19 | NS |
| Left hemispheric MD (×10−3 mm2/s), mean (SD) | 0.813 (0.036) | 0.816 (0.035) | 19 | NS |
| Mean FA of the left corona radiata, mean (SD) | 0.624 (0.041) | 0.592 (0.048) | 19 | <0.001 |
| B. Shunt non-responders (SNR, n = 8) | ||||
| TUG, mean (SD) | ||||
| Time to complete (s) | 15.6 (3.1) | 14.2 (3.5) | 7 | NS |
| Number of steps | 22.6 (4.0) | 20.5 (5.0) | 7 | NS |
| iNPHGS, median (range) | ||||
| Gait disturbance | 2.0 (1–4) | 2.0 (1–4) | NS | |
| Cognitive disturbance | 2.5 (1–3) | 2.0 (1–3) | NS | |
| Urinary disturbance | 2.0 (0–4) | 2.0 (0–4) | NS | |
| Total | 7.0 (4–9) | 7.0 (4–9) | NS | |
| MMSE, mean (SD) | 22.3 (5.0) | 22.3 (5.0) | 7 | NS |
| FAB, mean (SD) | 11.0 (3.8) | 11.0 (3.7) | 7 | NS |
| Left VV/ICV ratio (%), mean (SD) | 7.19 (1.99) | 6.40 (1.79) | 7 | 0.005 |
| Left Hemispheric FA, mean (SD) | 0.380 (0.024) | 0.375 (0.030) | 7 | NS |
| Left Hemispheric MD (×10−3 mm2/s), mean (SD) | 0.829 (0.068) | 0.876 (0.099) | 7 | NS |
| Mean FA of the left corona radiata, mean (SD) | 0.612 (0.043) | 0.607 (0.044) | 7 | NS |
DTI diffusion tensor imaging, INPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, iNPHGS idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus grading scale, TUG Timed “Up and GO” test, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, FAB frontal assessment battery, Left VV/ICV ratio the volume of the left lateral ventricle + the cerebral aqueduct + the left side region of the third and fourth ventricles/the left half volume of the intracranial space, FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, SD standard deviation, df degrees of freedom, NS not significant
aPaired Student’s t test was used except for iNPHGS (Wilcoxon signed rank test)
Fig. 2Changes in left VV/ICV ratio, hemispheric FA, and hemispheric MD after shunt placement. Significance of interaction between shunt effectiveness for clinical improvement and for each index is denoted as follows: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
Fig. 3White matter regions in which FA values were significantly lower in shunt-responsive INPH. The areas with significantly lower FA values are demonstrated by colours ranging from blue to light-blue in the shunt-responsive INPH patients compared to control subjects (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons by using TFCE). The mis-registered regions are shown in white. A anterior, L left, P posterior
Regions of the peaks for significant clusters in TBSS analyses
| Hemisphere | MNI coordinate (x, y, z) | T valuea | Cluster size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. FA for shunt responders (SR) at baseline compared to healthy controls (HC) | ||||
| Region | ||||
| Middle part of cingulum | Right | 5, −12, 35 | 6.88 | 7210 |
| Middle part of corpus callosum | Left | −10, −25, 38 | 5.56 | |
| SWM of superior parietal lobule | Left | −22, −51, 56 | 5.33 | |
| Posterior part of corpus callosum | Left | −10, −43, 33 | 5.31 | |
| Posterior part of corpus callosum | Right | 12, −48, 20 | 6.29 | 713 |
| Posterior part of cingulum | Right | 10, −39, 37 | 4.63 | |
| Splenium of corpus callosum | Right | 10, −46, 13 | 4.58 | |
| SWM of precuneus | Right | 9, −56, 27 | 5.63 | 113 |
| SWM of superior parietal lobule | Right | 15, −47, 52 | 5.55 | 4177 |
| SWM of primary motor cortex | Right | 23, −27, 57 | 4.99 | |
| SWM of cuneus | Right | 16, −74, 33 | 4.57 | |
| SWM of frontal operculum | Right | 43, 4, 18 | 4.66 | 387 |
| SWM of frontal operculum | Right | 42, 20, 16 | 4.47 | 358 |
| Excluded regions | ||||
| SWM of frontal operculum | Right | 41, 22, 6 | 7.01 | 39 |
| Perithalamic white matter | Right | 6, −14, 7 | 5.68 | 8 |
| B. MD for shunt responders (SR) at baseline compared to healthy controls (HC) | ||||
| Region | ||||
| SWM of primary motor cortex | Left | −30, −14, 53 | 3.72 | 118 |
| SWM of superior parietal lobule | Left | −13, −59, 49 | 3.48 | 119 |
| SWM of primary motor cortex | Right | 13, −20, 56 | 3.47 | 117 |
| SWM of precuneus | Right | 10, −53, 24 | 3.40 | 115 |
| SWM of orbitofrontal cortex | Left | −26, 21, −18 | 3.37 | 114 |
| SWM of lateral occipital cortex | Right | 38, −63, 27 | 3.35 | 111 |
| Cingulum (cingulate gyrus) | Right | 7, −26, 37 | 3.01 | 106 |
| Cerebral peduncle | Left | −10, −17, −7 | 2.74 | 108 |
| SWM of middle temporal gyrus | Right | 51, −42, 4 | 2.74 | 101 |
| External capsule | Right | 23, 20, −4 | 2.73 | 112 |
| SWM of superior frontal gyrus | Left | −18, −1, 47 | 2.63 | 103 |
| SWM of superior parietal lobule | Right | 42, −53, 39 | 2.58 | 94 |
| Posterior corona radiata | Right | 35, −40, 36 | 2.43 | 87 |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus | Left | −30, 15, 30 | 2.38 | 100 |
| Perithalamic white matter | Left | −18, −22, 9 | 2.32 | 83 |
| SWM of inferior parietal lobule | Right | 58, −28, 31 | 2.28 | 105 |
| SWM of superior temporal gyrus | Right | 51, −16, −2 | 2.17 | 98 |
| SWM of primary sensory cortex | Left | −9, −45, 59 | 2.14 | 39 |
| SWM of precuneus | Left | −8, −58, 42 | 2.10 | 96 |
| Excluded regions | ||||
| Cingulum (hippocampus) | Right | 26, −41, −6 | 14.4 | 120 |
| Fornix | Right | 3, −20, 20 | 10.6 | 120 |
| Fornix | Left | 0, −20, 21 | 10.6 | |
| SWM of frontal operculum | Right | 54, −10, 14 | 5.57 | 116 |
| C. FA in shunt responders (SR) post-operation compared to baseline | ||||
| Corona radiata | Left | −27, −10, 15 | 6.93b | 66 |
DTI diffusion tensor imaging, INPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, HC healthy controls, MNI Montreal Neurological Institute, FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, SR shunt responder, SWM subcortical white matter
aThe number of degrees of freedom is 28
bThe number of degrees of freedom is 19
Fig. 4White matter regions in which MD values were significantly higher in shunt-responsive INPH. The areas with significantly higher MD values are demonstrated by colours ranging from red to yellow in the shunt-responsive INPH patients compared to control subjects (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons by using TFCE). The mis-registered regions are shown in white. A anterior, L left, P posterior
Fig. 5White matter regions in which FA values significantly changed after shunt placement. a Demonstrates the areas with significantly decreased FA values after shunt placement in the shunt-responsive INPH patients using colours ranging from light-blue to pink (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons by using TFCE). b Shows the position of the anatomical ROI. On colour-coded FA map, red, green, and blue represent the direction of fibres (red, right-left; green, anterior-posterior; blue, superior-inferior). The ROI was placed on the blue regions in the left radiata on the axial slice that included the genu of the corpus callosum. A anterior, L left, P posterior