Literature DB >> 28124731

Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls.

Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha1, Renata Helena Branco2, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante2, Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo2, Fábio Morato Monteiro2, Enilson Geraldo Ribeiro3.   

Abstract

Understanding the reasons why animals of similar performances have different feed requirements is important to increase profits for cattle producers and to decrease the environmental footprint of beef cattle production. This study was carried out aiming to identify the associations between residual feed intake (RFI) and animal performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood metabolites related to energy balance of young Nellore bulls during the finishing period. Animals previously classified as low (n = 13) and high RFI (n = 12), with average initial body weight of 398 kg and age of 503 days were used. Cattle were fed a high energy diet and were slaughtered when rib fat thickness measured by ultrasound between the 12th and 13th ribs reached the minimum of 4 mm. A completely randomized design was adopted, being data analyzed with a mixed model that included the random effect of slaughter group, the fixed effect of RFI class, and linear effect of the covariate feedlot time. No differences were found (p > 0.10) between RFI classes for performance, dry matter, and nutrients intake. However, dry (p = 0.0911) and organic matter (p = 0.0876) digestibility tended to be lower, and digestibility of neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein (p = 0.0017), and total digestible nutrients (p = 0.0657) were lower for high RFI animals, indicating lesser capacity of food utilization. Difference between low and high RFI animals was also found for blood cortisol at the end of the trial (p = 0.0044), having low RFI animals lower cortisol concentrations. Differences in the ability to digest food can affect the efficiency of transforming feed into meat by Nellore cattle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef cattle; Cortisol; Digestibility; Efficiency; Nutrients intake

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28124731     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1224-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  13 in total

1.  Evidence of residual feed intake reranking in crossbred replacement heifers.

Authors:  O N Durunna; M G Colazo; D J Ambrose; D McCartney; V S Baron; J A Basarab
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Residual feed intake of purebred Angus steers: effects on meat quality and palatability.

Authors:  S D Baker; J I Szasz; T A Klein; P S Kuber; C W Hunt; J B Glaze; D Falk; R Richard; J C Miller; R A Battaglia; R A Hill
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle.

Authors:  S S Moore; F D Mujibi; E L Sherman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Residual feed intake and blood variables in young Nellore cattle.

Authors:  C F Nascimento; R H Branco; S F M Bonilha; J N S G Cyrillo; J A Negrão; M E Z Mercadante
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Relationships of feeding behaviors with average daily gain, dry matter intake, and residual feed intake in Red Angus-sired cattle.

Authors:  M McGee; C M Welch; J A Ramirez; G E Carstens; W J Price; J B Hall; R A Hill
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Meat quality of young Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake.

Authors:  K Zorzi; S F M Bonilha; A C Queiroz; R H Branco; T L Sobrinho; M S Duarte
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification.

Authors:  P Lawrence; D A Kenny; B Earley; M McGee
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers.

Authors:  A K Kelly; M McGee; D H Crews; A G Fahey; A R Wylie; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake.

Authors:  C Fitzsimons; D A Kenny; M H Deighton; A G Fahey; M McGee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation, and performance of pregnant beef cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake offered grass silage.

Authors:  C Fitzsimons; D A Kenny; A G Fahey; M McGee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  8 in total

1.  Associations between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane-producing activity, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle1.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Johnson; Gordon E Carstens; Wimberly K Krueger; Phillip A Lancaster; Erin G Brown; Luis O Tedeschi; Robin C Anderson; Kristen A Johnson; Arieh Brosh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Understanding the role of rumen epithelial host-microbe interactions in cattle feed efficiency.

Authors:  Sang Weon Na; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-04-16

3.  Association of residual feed intake with abundance of ruminal bacteria and biopolymer hydrolyzing enzyme activities during the peripartal period and early lactation in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; José M Arroyo; Fernanda Batistel; Michael A Iakiviak; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-14

4.  Relationship between feed efficiency indexes and performance, body measurements, digestibility, energy partitioning, and nitrogen partitioning in pre-weaning dairy heifers.

Authors:  Camila Flávia de Assis Lage; Sandra Gesteira Coelho; Hilton do Carmo Diniz Neto; Victor Marco Rocha Malacco; João Paulo Pacheco Rodrigues; João Paulo Sacramento; Fernanda Samarini Machado; Luiz Gustavo Ribeiro Pereira; Thierry Ribeiro Tomich; Mariana Magalhães Campos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Residual feed intake divergence during the preweaning period is associated with unique hindgut microbiome and metabolome profiles in neonatal Holstein heifer calves.

Authors:  Ahmed Elolimy; Abdulrahman Alharthi; Mohamed Zeineldin; Claudia Parys; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-20

6.  Phenotypic association among performance, feed efficiency and methane emission traits in Nellore cattle.

Authors:  Leandro Sannomiya Sakamoto; Luana Lelis Souza; Sarah Bernardes Gianvecchio; Matheus Henrique Vargas de Oliveira; Josineudson Augusto Ii de Vasconcelos Silva; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Renata Helena Branco; Melissa Baccan; Alexandre Berndt; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Animals selected for postweaning weight gain rate have similar maintenance energy requirements regardless of their residual feed intake classification.

Authors:  Camila Delveaux Araujo Batalha; Luís Orlindo Tedeschi; Fabiana Lana de Araújo; Renata Helena Branco; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; Mohamed K Abdelmegeid; Joshua C McCann; Daniel W Shike; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.