Literature DB >> 22003232

Evidence of residual feed intake reranking in crossbred replacement heifers.

O N Durunna1, M G Colazo, D J Ambrose, D McCartney, V S Baron, J A Basarab.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to examine whether residual feed intake (RFI) reranking exists between 2 consecutive periods in replacement heifers fed the same diet. The study collected feed intake and BW data from 190 crossbred heifers over a 3-yr period (61 in 2007, 68 in 2008, and 61 in 2009) during the winter-spring season. The heifers were fed a roughage-based diet (90% barley silage and 10% rolled barley grain) throughout the feeding trial, which was broken down into 2 feeding periods with ADG of 0.94 and 0.90 kg•d(-1) in the first and second periods, respectively. The RFI was calculated for the entire period using different models, which included ADG, mid-metabolic BW, body composition, and feeding activity. Gain:feed ratio and Kleiber ratio were also calculated. Rank correlations among the RFI calculated from different models were obtained, as well as rank correlations between the 2 feeding periods for the feed efficiency measures. Including body composition and feeding activity only improved the R(2) by 1 to 5%. The rank correlations among the different models were high (90 to 95%) for RFI calculated for the entire feeding period. However, the RFI calculated within the second feeding period had greater rank correlation than the RFI calculated from the entire feeding period. Compared with G:F and Kleiber ratio, RFI gave lesser reranking between periods 1 and 2. About 49% of the heifers maintained their RFI class, whereas 51% of the heifers had a different RFI class in period 2. Furthermore, 41% of the heifers changed their RFI in period 2 by <0.5 SD, whereas the rest of the heifers changed by ≥0.5 SD. These results indicate that reranking exists in heifers despite receiving the same diet in the 2 feeding periods and that the reranking may be more serious in heifers (28%) with extreme RFI performances in each period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22003232     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

Review 1.  Residual feed intake: a nutritional tool for genetic improvement.

Authors:  Leilson Rocha Bezerra; José Lindenberg Rocha Sarmento; Severino Gonzaga Neto; Ney Rômulo Oliveira de Paula; Ronaldo Lopes Oliveira; Wagner Martins Fontes do Rêgo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Non-genetic sources of variation and temporal variability in growth and feed efficiency traits among phylogenetically distinct clusters of indigenous chicken in Kenya.

Authors:  Sophie Miyumo; Alexander K Kahi; Chrilukovian B Wasike
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Feed efficiency of tropically adapted cattle when fed in winter or spring in a temperate location.

Authors:  Sam W Coleman; Chad C Chase; William A Phillips; David Greg Riley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls.

Authors:  Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha; Renata Helena Branco; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Fábio Morato Monteiro; Enilson Geraldo Ribeiro
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in a random population of Pekin duck.

Authors:  Yunsheng Zhang; Zhan Bao Guo; Ming Xie; Zhiying Zhang; Shuisheng Hou
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Impact of supplemental protein source offered to primiparous heifers during gestation on II. Progeny performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  A F Summers; A D Blair; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Relationships among feed efficiency traits across production segments and production cycles in cattle.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.