Literature DB >> 20362245

The rise and fall of the "minimum clinically important difference".

Eugene J Carragee.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20362245     DOI： 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN： 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

1.  How do idiopathic scoliosis patients who improve after surgery differ from those who do not exceed a minimum detectable change?

Authors:  Joan Bago; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Ferran Pellise; Esther Les
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Operative versus nonoperative interventions for common fractures of the clavicle: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Tahira Devji; Ydo Kleinlugtenbelt; Nathan Evaniew; Bill Ristevski; Shoghag Khoudigian; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-11-10

3.  Minimally invasive versus open surgery for cervical and lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Moin Khan; Brian Drew; Desmond Kwok; Mohit Bhandari; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights®: What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?

Authors:  Mitchell Maltenfort
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does Tourniquet Use in TKA Affect Recovery of Lower Extremity Strength and Function? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Andrew J Kittelson; Charlie C Yang; Todd M Miner; Raymond H Kim; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Impact of coexistent lumbar spine disorders on clinical outcomes and physician charges associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Linda R Van Dillen; Steven M Kymes; Melissa A Armbrecht; Dustin Stwalley; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Objective measurement of function following lumbar spinal stenosis decompression reveals improved functional capacity with stagnant real-life physical activity.

Authors:  Matthew Smuck; Amir Muaremi; Patricia Zheng; Justin Norden; Aman Sinha; Richard Hu; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar axial or discogenic pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kimberly A Cash; Carla D McManus; Vidyasagar Pampati; Ramsin Benyamin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Assessment of effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic low back pain secondary to lumbar central spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kimberly A Cash; Carla D McManus; Vidyasagar Pampati
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.