| Literature DB >> 28123482 |
Edward Kijak1, Jerzy Margielewicz2, Danuta Lietz-Kijak3, Katarzyna Wilemska-Kucharzewska4, Marek Kucharzewski5, Zbigniew Śliwiński6.
Abstract
The present study aimed to determine the numeric projection of the function of the mandible and muscle system during mastication. An experimental study was conducted on a healthy 47 year-old subject. On clinical examination no functional disorders were observed. To evaluate the activity of mastication during muscle functioning, bread cubes and hazelnuts were selected (2 cm2 and 1.2/1.3 cm in diameter, respectively) for condyloid processing. An assessment of the activity of mastication during muscle functioning was determined on the basis of numeric calculations conducted with a novel software programme, Kinematics 3D, designed specifically for this study. The efficacy of the model was verified by ensuring the experimentally recorded trajectories were concordant with those calculated numerically. Experimental measurements of the characteristic points of the mandible trajectory were recorded six times. Using the configuration coordinates that were calculated, the dominant componential harmonics of the amplitude-frequency spectrum were identified. The average value of the dominant frequency during mastication of the bread cubes was ~1.16±0.06 Hz, whereas in the case of the hazelnut, this value was nearly two-fold higher at 1.84±0.07 Hz. The most asymmetrical action during mastication was demonstrated to be carried out by the lateral pterygoid muscles, provided that their functioning was not influenced by food consistency. The consistency of the food products had a decisive impact on the frequency of mastication and the number of cycles necessary to grind the food. Model tests on the function of the masticatory organ serve as effective tools since they provide qualitative and quantitative novel information on the functioning of the human masticatory organ.Entities:
Keywords: biomechanics; modelling; muscle activity; stomatognathic system
Year: 2016 PMID: 28123482 PMCID: PMC5245084 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.(A) Spatial orientation of the mandibular kinematics and (B) scheme used for the identification of the spatial orientation of the muscle fibres.
Figure 2.Registered trajectories of the incisors in the front plane during mastication of the bread, with the exception of the first cycle.
Figure 3.Registered trajectories of the incisors in the front plane during mastication of the hazelnut, with the exception of the first cycle.
Extent of the shifts in the measurement points of the mandible presented as the mean ± standard error.
| A, Mastication of bread (n=6). | |||||||||
| Right condyloid process | Left condyloid process | Incisors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | x (mm) | y (mm) | z (mm) | x (mm) | y (mm) | z (mm) | x (mm) | y (mm) | z (mm) |
| −1.2±0.4 | −7.4±0.7 | −1.1±0.2 | −1.1±0.6 | −7.9±0.9 | −1.0±0.3 | −3.0±0.4 | −25.3±2.2 | −2.0±0.7 | |
| 7.3±0.5 | 1.2±0.5 | 0.6±0.1 | 13.2±1.3 | 1.2±0.5 | 1.0±0.2 | 2.9±0.2 | 2.4±1.2 | 9.2±1.4 | |
| B, Mastication of hazelnuts (n=6). | |||||||||
| Right condyloid process | Left condyloid process | Incisors | |||||||
| Item | x (mm) | y (mm) | z (mm) | x (mm) | y (mm) | z (mm) | x (mm) | y (mm) | z (mm) |
| −1.9±0.4 | −7.4±1.0 | −1.3±0.4 | −1.2±0.3 | −9.4±0.6 | −1.2±0.4 | −3.9±0.9 | −21.9±1.1 | −1.7±1.0 | |
| 5.7±0.4 | 1.7±0.6 | 1.6±0.1 | 11.2±1.3 | 1.4±0.5 | 2.0±0.2 | 2.1±0.4 | 2.2±0.8 | 9.6±0.7 | |
Maximum extent of the changes in muscle fibre length during mastication.
| Mastication of bread (n=6) | Mastication of hazelnuts (n=6) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On the right side | On the left side | On the right side | On the left side | |||||
| Item | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ |
| MSA | −1.2±0.6 | 20.0±1.1 | −1.1±0.6 | 18.9±0.9 | −1.3±0.4 | 15.8±0.7 | −1.4±0.5 | 16.1±0.6 |
| MSP | −1.0±0.5 | 14.7±0.7 | −0.9±0.4 | 13.5±0.6 | −1.2±0.3 | 11.7±0.6 | −1.2±0.3 | 11.9±0.4 |
| MDA | −0.9±0.5 | 14.2±0.7 | −0.9±0.4 | 14.0±0.8 | −1.1±0.4 | 11.5±0.5 | −0.9±0.2 | 12.7±0.4 |
| MDP | −0.9±0.4 | 11.8±0.6 | −0.8±0.4 | 11.3±0.6 | −1.2±0.4 | 10.0±0.5 | −0.9±0.2 | 10.9±0.3 |
| PA | −1.0±0.5 | 17.2±1.1 | −0.9±0.4 | 15.9±0.6 | −1.1±0.3 | 13.7±0.7 | −1.3±0.4 | 12.8±0.6 |
| PP | −0.9±0.4 | 12.4±0.8 | −0.8±0.3 | 11.6±0.4 | −0.9±0.2 | 10.6±0.6 | −1.2±0.3 | 9.9±0.5 |
| LU | −2.7±0.3 | 1.5±0.3 | −5.9±0.7 | 0.8±0.3 | −3.9±0.3 | 3.2±0.5 | −5.5±0.9 | 1.2±0.5 |
| LP | −3.4±0.3 | 1.1±0.3 | −6.3±0.7 | 0.7±0.3 | −4.4±0.3 | 2.7±0.5 | −6.1±0.9 | 0.8±0.4 |
| LL | −7.2±0.4 | 0.7±0.4 | −9.4±0.6 | 0.8±0.5 | −7.9±0.3 | 1.4±0.3 | −9.4±0.6 | 0.5±0.1 |
| TV | −1.4±0.7 | 22.4±1.2 | −1.4±0.7 | 22.9±1.3 | −1.2±0.5 | 18.7±0.7 | −1.3±0.4 | 21.0±0.6 |
| TA | −1.3±0.7 | 22.0±1.1 | −1.4±0.8 | 24.1±1.6 | −1.1±0.6 | 19.4±0.6 | −0.9±0.3 | 23.2±0.7 |
| TP | −1.1±0.6 | 16.9±0.8 | −1.2±0.8 | 19.7±9.2 | −1.1±0.5 | 15.9±0.5 | −0.6±0.2 | 19.9±0.6 |
| D | −9.1±0.7 | 1.9±0.6 | −8.4±0.6 | 2.8±0.88 | −8.8±0.7 | 2.0±1.14 | −7.4±0.8 | 2.4±0.9 |
MSA, superficial front fibres of the masticators; MSP, superficial back fibres of the masticators; MDA, deep front fibres of the masticators; MDP, deep back fibres of the masticators; PA, front fibres of the pterygoid-medial muscle; PP, back fibres of the pterygoid-medial muscle; LU, upper pad of the pterygoid-lateral muscle; LP, transitional pad of the pterygoid-lateral muscle; LL, lower pad of the pterygoid-lateral muscle; TV, vertical fibres of the temporal muscle; TA, transitional fibres of the temporal muscle; TP, back fibres of the temporal muscle; D, group of suprahyoid muscles.
Figure 4.Sample charts illustrating the (A) symmetric and (B) asymmetric action of the muscles.
Ratios (wP) of muscle mastication function presented as the mean ± standard error.
| Mastication of bread (n=6) | Mastication of hazelnut (n=6) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Δ | dΔl/dt (mm/s) | d2Δ | Mean | Δl (mm) | dΔl/dt (mm/s) | d2Δ | |
| MSA | 0.87±0.07 | 0.81±0.09 | 0.55±0.31 | 0.74±0.10 | 0.97±0.01 | 0.96±0.01 | 0.89±0.03 | 0.94±0.02 |
| MSP | 0.70±0.16 | 0.56±0.23 | 0.25±0.32 | 0.50±0.13 | 0.94±0.01 | 0.91±0.02 | 0.78±0.06 | 0.88±0.05 |
| MDA | 0.94±0.01 | 0.84±0.06 | 0.48±0.29 | 0.75±0.14 | 0.83±0.05 | 0.91±0.01 | 0.80±0.02 | 0.84±0.03 |
| MDP | 0.92±0.02 | 0.81±0.07 | 0.45±0.28 | 0.73±0.14 | 0.85±0.05 | 0.92±0.01 | 0.80±0.03 | 0.86±0.03 |
| PA | 0.74±0.13 | 0.72±0.14 | 0.58±0.22 | 0.68±0.05 | 0.58±0.12 | 0.76±0.06 | 0.73±0.05 | 0.69±0.06 |
| PP | 0.71±0.16 | 0.69±0.16 | 0.48±0.31 | 0.63±0.07 | 0.53±0.12 | 0.73±0.07 | 0.68±0.06 | 0.65±0.06 |
| LU | 0.00±0.00 | 0.04±0.09 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.01±0.01 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.01±0.01 | 0.01±0.01 |
| LP | 0.02±0.06 | 0.08±0.14 | 0.00±0.01 | 0.04±0.02 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.05±0.05 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.03±0.02 |
| LL | 0.46±0.14 | 0.56±0.06 | 0.28±0.17 | 0.44±0.08 | 0.14±0.09 | 0.47±0.04 | 0.30±0.08 | 0.30±0.10 |
| TV | 0.99±0.00 | 0.98±0.01 | 0.83±0.21 | 0.93±0.05 | 0.95±0.02 | 0.98±0.00 | 0.96±0.00 | 0.96±0.01 |
| TA | 0.90±0.04 | 0.89±0.02 | 0.75±0.11 | 0.85±0.05 | 0.74±0.06 | 0.88±0.01 | 0.83±0.01 | 0.82±0.04 |
| TP | 0.80±0.09 | 0.82±0.04 | 0.61±0.13 | 0.74±0.06 | 0.59±0.09 | 0.81±0.02 | 0.74±0.01 | 0.71±0.06 |
| D | 0.64±0.20 | 0.59±0.19 | 0.72±0.11 | 0.65±0.04 | 0.29±0.19 | 0.58±0.12 | 0.76±0.05 | 0.54±0.14 |
MSA, superficial front fibres of the masticators; MSP, superficial back fibres of the masticators; MDA, deep front fibres of the masticators; MDP, deep back fibres of the masticators; PA, front fibres of the pterygoid-medial muscle; PP, back fibres of the pterygoid-medial muscle; LU, upper pad of the pterygoid-lateral muscle; LP, transitional pad of the pterygoid-lateral muscle; LL, lower pad of the pterygoid-lateral muscle; TV, vertical fibres of the temporal muscle; TA, transitional fibres of the temporal muscle; TP, back fibres of the temporal muscle; D, group of suprahyoid muscles.
Figure 5.The mean change in the length fibres of (A) the masticator muscle and (B) a lateral-pterygoid muscle.