Literature DB >> 11843269

Does malocclusion affect masticatory performance?

Jeryl D English1, P H Buschang, G S Throckmorton.   

Abstract

This purpose of this study was to evaluate the largely untested assumption that malocclusion negatively affects masticatory performance. A sample of 185 untreated subjects (48% male and 52% female) from 7 to 37 years of age, representing subjects with normal occlusion (n = 38), Class I (n = 56), Class II (n = 45), and Class III (n = 46) malocclusion, were evaluated. Masticatory performance was evaluated objectively using artificial (CutterSil, median particle size and broadness of the distribution) and real foods (number of chews for jerky and almonds), and subjectively using a visual analog scale. The results showed no significant differences in age or the body mass index (Wt/Ht2) between the occlusion groups. Subjects with normal occlusion had significantly smaller particle sizes (P = .001) and broader particle distributions (P < .001) than subjects with malocclusion. Compared with the normal occlusion group, the median particle sizes for the Class I, II, and III malocclusion groups were approximately 9%, 15%, and 34% larger, respectively. There were also significant group differences in their subjective ability to chew fresh carrots or celery (P = .019) and firm meat (P = .003). Class III subjects reported the greatest difficulty, followed by Class II subjects, Class I subjects, and subjects with normal occlusion, respectively. We conclude that malocclusion negatively affects subjects' ability to process and break down foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11843269     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0021:DMAMP>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  40 in total

1.  Malocclusion traits and oral health-related quality of life in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammadamin Najirad; Sreenath Arekunnath Madathil; Frank Rauch; V Reid Sutton; Brendan Lee; Jean-Marc Retrouvey; Shahrokh Esfandiari
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the relationship between masticatory performance and skeletal malocclusion.

Authors:  Jung-Chul Park; Hyun-Seung Shin; Jung-Yul Cha; Jong-Tae Park
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 3.  Malocclusion, mastication and the gastrointestinal system: a review.

Authors:  Peter Proff
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Masticatory function after bite-raising with light-cured orthodontic band cement in healthy adults.

Authors:  Chidsanu Changsiripun; Darin Pativetpinyo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  A two-colored chewing gum test for assessing masticatory performance: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Toshiya Endo; Akira Komatsuzaki; Hiroomi Kurokawa; Satoshi Tanaka; Yoshiki Kobayashi; Koji Kojima
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Orthopedic correction of growing hyperdivergent, retrognathic patients with miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Roberto Carrillo; P Emile Rossouw
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Changes in occlusal bite force following placement of preformed metal crowns on primary molars in 4-6 years old children: a 6 months' follow-up pilot study.

Authors:  A I Owais; A H Al-Battah; E S Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-11-20

8.  USE OF THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE (MCID) FOR EVALUATING TREATMENT OUTCOMES WITH TMJMD PATIENTS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY().

Authors:  Megan Ingram; Yun Hee Choi; Chung-Yi Chiu; Rob Haggard; Angela Liegey Dougall; Peter Buschang; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Appl Biobehav Res       Date:  2012-01-10

9.  Masticatory performance and chewing cycle kinematics-are they related?

Authors:  Casey Lepley; Gaylord Throckmorton; Sarah Parker; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bauer; Rolf Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.