| Literature DB >> 29983815 |
Kujtim Shala1, Teuta Bicaj1, Teuta Pustina-Krasniqi1, Enis Ahmedi1, Linda Dula1, Zana Lila-Krasniqi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are a lot of factors influencing the efficiency of mastication; therefore there are also a lot of methods for testing this efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Complete dentures; Electromyography; Masticatory efficiency
Year: 2018 PMID: 29983815 PMCID: PMC6026418 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
Figure 1EMG-Dynograph R-511 A
Comparison of gender, age and non –experienced/experienced group
| Gender | Non–experienced/experienced group with complete dentures | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Non – experienced | Experienced | |
| N | 42 | 46 | 45 | 43 |
| 54.6 | 55.7 | 52.7 | 57.8 | |
| DS | 5.4 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 4.1 |
| X max | 66 | 68 | 65 | 68 |
| X min | 42 | 44 | 42 | 49 |
The values of the masticatory index during the realisation of SMT in 6 time intervals, in DS and NDS, in both sexes with and without experience with complete dentures
| Measurement | Gender | Experience | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | E | NE | |||||||
| DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | |
| N | 42 | 42 | 46 | 46 | 45 | 45 | 43 | 43 | 88 | 88 |
| 1x | 12.9 | 10.8 | 12.4 | 14.8 | 13.6 | 14.6 | 11.9 | 11.2 | 12.7 | 12.9 |
| DS | 0.3 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.6 |
| 2x | 25.3 | 19.5 | 16.3 | 23.1 | 20.9 | 22.1 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 20.6 | 21.4 |
| DS | 0.62 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 1.16 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| 3x | 33.9 | 29.6 | 19.5 | 18.4 | 27.9 | 24.9 | 24.7 | 22.5 | 26.3 | 23.7 |
| DS | 1.89 | 1.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.85 | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.40 | 1.25 | 1.1 |
| 4x | 24.2 | 25.8 | 20.8 | 21.0 | 23.0 | 25.1 | 21.9 | 21.4 | 22.5 | 23.5 |
| DS | 0.8 | 1.55 | 0.90 | 1.0 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 0.90 | 1.17 | 0.64 | 0.94 |
| 5x | 28.4 | 20.7 | 20.0 | 220.1 | 24.8 | 22.1 | 23.2 | 18.7 | 24.0 | 20.4 |
| DS | 1.0 | 1.14 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 1.225 | 1.0 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.68 |
| 6x | 33.6 | 26.8 | 18.6 | 22.1 | 25.8 | 26.1 | 25.8 | 22.5 | 25.8 | 24.3 |
| DS | 1.11 | 1.31 | 0.87 | 1.10 | 1.58 | 1.43 | 1.36 | 0.93 | 1.0 | 0.88 |
The values of the masticatory index (A/F) during the realisation of SMT in certain intervals, in DS and NDS, in both sexes with and without experience with complete dentures
| Measurement | Gender | Experience | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | E | NE | |||||||
| DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | |
| N | 42 | 42 | 46 | 46 | 45 | 45 | 43 | 43 | 88 | 88 |
| 1x | 9.8 | 7.7 | 8.3 | 10.2 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 8.8 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| DS | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 2x | 16.9 | 14.1 | 10.7 | 15.1 | 13.5 | 15.0 | 13.9 | 14.2 | 13.7 | 14.6 |
| DS | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 3x | 24.4 | 20.5 | 14.5 | 12.2 | 20.2 | 16.3 | 18.3 | 15.9 | 17.0 | 17.3 |
| DS | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 4x | 18.6 | 18.6 | 15.5 | 16.1 | 17.4 | 18.7 | 18.7 | 16.5 | 17.0 | 17.3 |
| DS | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5x | 21.4 | 16.0 | 15.5 | 15.9 | 18.6 | 16.8 | 18.0 | 14.9 | 18.3 | 15.9 |
| DS | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 6x | 22.6 | 19.9 | 14.1 | 14.9 | 18.0 | 18.2 | 18.3 | 16.4 | 18.2 | 17.3 |
| DS | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 |