| Literature DB >> 28122388 |
Bing Qiu1, Fei Liu2, Bensen Tang1, Biyong Deng1, Fang Liu1, Weimin Zhu1, Dong Zhen1, Mingyuan Xue2, Mingjiao Zhang2.
Abstract
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was designed to improve the accuracy of preoperative planning and postoperative prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, better understanding needs to be achieved due to the subtle nature of the PSI systems. In this study, 3D printing technique based on the image data of computed tomography (CT) has been utilized for optimal controlling of the surgical parameters. Two groups of TKA cases have been randomly selected as PSI group and control group with no significant difference of age and sex (p > 0.05). The PSI group is treated with 3D printed cutting guides whereas the control group is treated with conventional instrumentation (CI). By evaluating the proximal osteotomy amount, distal osteotomy amount, valgus angle, external rotation angle, and tibial posterior slope angle of patients, it can be found that the preoperative quantitative assessment and intraoperative changes can be controlled with PSI whereas CI is relied on experience. In terms of postoperative parameters, such as hip-knee-ankle (HKA), frontal femoral component (FFC), frontal tibial component (FTC), and lateral tibial component (LTC) angles, there is a significant improvement in achieving the desired implant position (p < 0.05). Assigned from the morphology of patients' knees, the PSI represents the convergence of congruent designs with current personalized treatment tools. The PSI can achieve less extremity alignment and greater accuracy of prosthesis implantation compared against control method, which indicates potential for optimal HKA, FFC, and FTC angles. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28122388 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Knee Surg ISSN: 1538-8506 Impact factor: 2.757