Literature DB >> 35874041

Functionally graded additive manufacturing for orthopedic applications.

Saquib Rouf1, Abrar Malik1, Ankush Raina1, Mir Irfan Ul Haq1, Nida Naveed2, Ali Zolfagharian3, Mahdi Bodaghi4.   

Abstract

Background: Additive Manufacturing due to its benefits in developing parts with complex geometries and shapes, has evolved as an alternate manufacturing process to develop implants with desired properties. The structure of human bones being anisotropic in nature is biologically functionally graded i,e. The structure possesses different properties in different directions. Therefore, various orthopedic implants such as knee, hip and other bone plates, if functionally graded can perform better. In this context, the development of functionally graded (FG) parts for orthopedic application with tailored anisotropic properties has become easier through the use of additive manufacturing (AM).
Objectives: and Rationale: The current paper aims to study the various aspects of additively manufactured FG parts for orthopedic applications. It presents the details of various orthopedic implants such as knee, hip and other bone plates in a structured manner. A systematic literature review is conducted to study the various material and functional aspects of functionally graded parts for orthopedic applications. A section is also dedicated to discuss the mechanical properties of functionally graded parts.
Conclusion: The literature revealed that additive manufacturing can provide lot of opportunities for development of functionally graded orthopedic implants with improved properties and durability. Further, the effect of various FG parameters on the mechanical behavior of these implants needs to be studied in detail. Also, with the advent of various AM technologies, the functional grading can be achieved by various means e.g. density, porosity, microstructure, composition, etc. By varying the AM parameters. However, the current limitations of cost and material biocompatibility prevent the widespread exploitation of AM technologies for various orthopedic applications.
© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Functionally graded parts; Implants; Medical applications; Orthopedics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35874041      PMCID: PMC9304666          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  86 in total

1.  Design approaches and challenges for biodegradable bone implants: a review.

Authors:  Girish Chandra; Ajay Pandey
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Biomechanical design and analysis of auxetic pedicle screw to resist loosening.

Authors:  Yan Yao; Hao Yuan; Huiwen Huang; Jinglong Liu; Lizhen Wang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Will 3D printing take away surgical planning from doctors?

Authors:  Lalit Maini; Raju Vaishya; Hitesh Lal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  Bone formation in coralline hydroxyapatite. Effects of pore size studied in rabbits.

Authors:  J H Kühne; R Bartl; B Frisch; C Hammer; V Jansson; M Zimmer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1994-06

5.  Retrieval study of commercially available knee implant coatings TiN, TiNbN and ZrN on TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo6.

Authors:  Maria Herbster; Joachim Döring; Jiri Nohava; Christoph H Lohmann; Thorsten Halle; Jessica Bertrand
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-08-18

6.  Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting.

Authors:  Peter Heinl; Lenka Müller; Carolin Körner; Robert F Singer; Frank A Müller
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Main Clinical Use of Additive Manufacturing (Three-Dimensional Printing) in Finland Restricted to the Head and Neck Area in 2016-2017.

Authors:  A B V Pettersson; M Salmi; P Vallittu; W Serlo; J Tuomi; A A Mäkitie
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.360

8.  Stability of unicortical locked fixation versus bicortical non-locked fixation for forearm fractures.

Authors:  Timothy J Pater; Steve I Grindel; Gregory J Schmeling; Mei Wang
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 9.  Hybrid fracture fixation systems developed for orthopaedic applications: A general review.

Authors:  Li Tian; Ning Tang; To Ngai; Chi Wu; Yechun Ruan; Le Huang; Ling Qin
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  3D printing technology used in severe hip deformity.

Authors:  Shanshan Wang; Li Wang; Yan Liu; Yongfang Ren; Li Jiang; Yan Li; Hao Zhou; Jie Chen; Wenxiao Jia; Hui Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.447

View more
  1 in total

1.  Tribo-corrosive behavior of additive manufactured parts for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Abrar Malik; Saquib Rouf; Mir Irfan Ul Haq; Ankush Raina; Ana Pilar Valerga Puerta; Binnur Sagbas; Alessandro Ruggiero
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.