Literature DB >> 34122751

Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Prasoon Kumar1, Pulak Vatsya2, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish1, Aman Hooda1, Mandeep S Dhillon1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ideal surgical positioning and placement of implants during arthroplasty are crucial for long-term survival and optimal functional outcomes. Inadequate bone stock or defects, and anatomical variations can influence the outcomes. Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is an evolving technology that could provide patient-specific instrumentation and implants for arthroplasty, taking into account anatomical variations and defects. However, its application in this field is still not adequately studied and described. The present review was conceptualised to assess the practicality, the pros and cons and the current status of usage of 3DP in the field of hip and knee arthroplasties and joint reconstruction surgeries.
METHODS: A PubMed database search was conducted and a total number of 135 hits were obtained, out of which only 30 articles were relevant. These 30 studies were assessed to obtain the qualitative evidence of the applicability and the current status of 3D printing in arthroplasty.
RESULTS: Currently, 3DP is used for preoperative planning with 3D models, to assess bone defects and anatomy, to determine the appropriate cuts and to develop patient-specific instrumentation and implants (cages, liners, tibial base plates, femoral stem). Its models can be used for teaching and training young surgeons, as well as patient education regarding the surgical complexities. The outcomes of using customised instrumentations and implants have been promising and 3D printing can evolve into routine practice in the years to come.
CONCLUSION: 3D printing in arthroplasty is an evolving field with promising results; however, current evidence is insufficient to determine significant advantages that can be termed cost effective and readily available. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3 dimensional printing; 3D; Hip arthroplasty; Knee arthroplasty; PSI; Patient specific instrumentation

Year:  2020        PMID: 34122751      PMCID: PMC8149509          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00263-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  47 in total

Review 1.  Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Martelli; Carole Serrano; Hélène van den Brink; Judith Pineau; Patrice Prognon; Isabelle Borget; Salma El Batti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Pelvic discontinuity in acetabular revisions: does CT scan overestimate it? A comparative study of diagnostic accuracy of 3D-modeling and traditional 3D CT scan.

Authors:  A Aprato; M Olivero; G Iannizzi; A Bistolfi; L Sabatini; A Masse
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

3.  Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Jan Dujardin; Hilde Vandenneucker; Nele Arnout; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing.

Authors:  André Luiz Jardini; Maria Aparecida Larosa; Rubens Maciel Filho; Cecília Amélia de Carvalho Zavaglia; Luis Fernando Bernardes; Carlos Salles Lambert; Davi Reis Calderoni; Paulo Kharmandayan
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  C Hurson; A Tansey; B O'Donnchadha; P Nicholson; J Rice; J McElwain
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Three-Dimensional Models in Planning of Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Complex Acetabular Defects.

Authors:  Gennadiy M Kavalerskiy; Valeriy Y Murylev; Yaroslav A Rukin; Pavel M Elizarov; Alexey V Lychagin; Evgeniya Y Tselisheva
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dall'Ava; Harry Hothi; Johann Henckel; Anna Di Laura; Paul Shearing; Alister Hart
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2019-11-06

8.  3D printing technology used in severe hip deformity.

Authors:  Shanshan Wang; Li Wang; Yan Liu; Yongfang Ren; Li Jiang; Yan Li; Hao Zhou; Jie Chen; Wenxiao Jia; Hui Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Accuracy of Coronal Plane Mechanical Alignment in a Customized, Individually Made Total Knee Replacement with Patient-Specific Instrumentation.

Authors:  Gary A Levengood; Jack Dupee
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  A high level of satisfaction after bicompartmental individualized knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants and instruments.

Authors:  Takahiro Ogura; Kiet Le; Gergo Merkely; Tim Bryant; Tom Minas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  1 in total

1.  From Three-Dimensional (3D)- to 6D-Printing Technology in Orthopedics: Science Fiction or Scientific Reality?

Authors:  Angelo V Vasiliadis; Nikolaos Koukoulias; Konstantinos Katakalos
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-07-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.