Literature DB >> 2811759

Effect of finite phosphor thickness on detective quantum efficiency.

R M Nishikawa1, M J Yaffe, R B Holmes.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe theoretically the relationship between the finite thickness of a phosphor screen and its spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency DQE(f-). The finite thickness of the screen causes a variation in both the total number of light quanta emitted from the screen in a burst from a given x-ray interaction and in the spatial distribution of the quanta within the light burst [i.e., shape or point spread function (PSF) of the light burst]. The variation in magnitude of the burst gives rise to a spatial-frequency-independent reduction in DQE, characterized by the scintillation efficiency As. The variation in PSF causes a roll off in DQE with increasing spatial frequency which we have characterized by the function Rc(f). Both As and Rc(f) can be determined from the moments of the distribution of the spatial Fourier spectrum of light bursts emitted from the phosphor and thus they are related: As is a scaling factor for Rc(f). Our theory predicts that it is necessary for all light bursts which appear at the output to have the same magnitude to maximize As and the same shape to maximize Rc(f). These requirements can lead to the result that the fluorescent screen with the highest modulation transfer function will not necessarily have the highest DQE(f) even at high spatial frequencies.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2811759     DOI: 10.1118/1.596335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  A grating-based single-shot x-ray phase contrast and diffraction method for in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Eric E Bennett; Rael Kopace; Ashley F Stein; Han Wen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Fabrication of high aspect-ratio polymer microstructures for large-area electronic portal x-ray imagers.

Authors:  J H Daniel; A Sawant; M Teepe; C Shih; R A Street; L E Antonuk
Journal:  Sens Actuators A Phys       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 3.407

3.  Back-irradiated and dual-screen sandwich detector configurations for radiography.

Authors:  Anthony R Lubinsky; Adrian Howansky; Hao Zheng; Wei Zhao
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-09

4.  Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd2 O2 S:Tb indirect flat panel detector x-ray imaging performance in front- and back-irradiation geometries.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; Anastasiia Mishchenko; A R Lubinsky; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  An apparatus and method for directly measuring the depth-dependent gain and spatial resolution of turbid scintillators.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; A R Lubinsky; Katsuhiko Suzuki; S Ghose; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Analogous Lubberts effect in photon counting detectors.

Authors:  Ke Li
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

7.  Figure of image quality and information capacity in digital mammography.

Authors:  Christos M Michail; Nektarios E Kalyvas; Ioannis G Valais; Ioannis P Fudos; George P Fountos; Nikos Dimitropoulos; Grigorios Koulouras; Dionisis Kandris; Maria Samarakou; Ioannis S Kandarakis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Estimation of errors in diffraction data measured by CCD area detectors.

Authors:  David Waterman; Gwyndaf Evans
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.304

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.