Literature DB >> 2811674

Categorization versus distance: hemispheric differences for processing spatial information.

J B Hellige, C Michimata.   

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that the brain computes two different kinds of spatial-relation representations: one used to assign a spatial relation to a category and the other used to specify metric distance with precision. The present visual half-field experiment offers support for this distinction by showing that the left and right cerebral hemispheres make more effective use of the categorization and metric distance representations, respectively. Furthermore, the inclusion of a bilateral stimulus presentation condition permits the computation of a reversed association that offers additional support for the distinction between two types of spatial-relation representation.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2811674     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information.

Authors:  J B Hellige; A K Taylor; T L Eng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Processing from LVF, RVF and BILATERAL presentations: examinations of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction.

Authors:  J B Hellige; J E Jonsson; C Michimata
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Discovering functionally independent mental processes: the principle of reversed association.

Authors:  J C Dunn; K Kirsner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries.

Authors:  J Sergent; J B Hellige
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres?

Authors:  J Levy; W Heller; M T Banich; L A Burton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces.

Authors:  J Levy; W Heller; M T Banich; L A Burton
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters.

Authors:  J B Hellige
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients.

Authors:  J Levy; C Trevarthen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  22 in total

1.  Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition.

Authors:  L J Rosielle; E E Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical judgments of direction versus coordinate judgments of velocity of motion.

Authors:  Stephen D Christman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal.

Authors:  J M Rybash; W J Hoyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

5.  Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

6.  Gender differences in object location memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Albert Postma; Brandy Brake; Julianne Imperato-McGinley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

7.  Neural correlates of language and non-language visuospatial processing in adolescents with reading disability.

Authors:  Joshua John Diehl; Stephen J Frost; Gordon Sherman; W Einar Mencl; Anish Kurian; Peter Molfese; Nicole Landi; Jonathan Preston; Anja Soldan; Robert K Fulbright; Jay G Rueckl; Mark S Seidenberg; Fumiko Hoeft; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.

Authors:  B Laeng; M Peters; B McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

9.  Independent coding of target distance and direction in visuo-spatial working memory.

Authors:  S Chieffi; D A Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997

Review 10.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.