Literature DB >> 1508052

Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal.

J M Rybash1, W J Hoyer.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine Kosslyn's (1987) claim that the left hemisphere (LH) is specialized for the computation of categorical spatial representations and that the right hemisphere (RH) is specialized for the computation of coordinate spatial representations. Categorical representations involve making judgements about the relative position of the components of a visual stimulus (e.g., whether one component is above/below another). Coordinate representations involve calibrating absolute distances between the components of a visual stimulus (e.g., whether one component is within 5 mm of another). Thirty-two male and 32 female undergraduates were administered two versions of a categorical or a coordinate task over three blocks of 36 trials. Within each block, items were presented to the right visual field-left hemisphere (RVF-LH), the left visual field-right hemisphere (LVF-RH), or a centralized position. Overall, results were more supportive of Kosslyn's assertions concerning the role played by the RH in the computation of spatial representations. Specifically, subjects displayed an LVF-RH advantage when performing both versions of the coordinate task. The LVF-RH advantage on the coordinate task, however, was confirmed to the first block of trials. Finally, it was found that males were more likely than females to display faster reaction times (RTs) on coordinate tasks, slower RTs on categorical tasks, and an LVF-RH advantage in computing coordinate tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1508052     DOI: 10.3758/bf03199664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; O Koenig; A Barrett; C B Cave; J Tang; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.

Authors:  M G McGee
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Categorization versus distance: hemispheric differences for processing spatial information.

Authors:  J B Hellige; C Michimata
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-11
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  Gender differences in object location memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Albert Postma; Brandy Brake; Julianne Imperato-McGinley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Deadlines in space: Selective effects of coordinate spatial processing in multitasking.

Authors:  Ivo Todorov; Fabio Del Missier; Linn Andersson Konke; Timo Mäntylä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

4.  The nature of categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing: An interference study.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Gregoire Borst
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-10-06

5.  Individual differences in spatial relation processing: effects of strategy, ability, and gender.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Gregoire Borst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  A penny for your thoughts! patterns of fMRI activity reveal the content and the spatial topography of visual mental images.

Authors:  Maddalena Boccia; Laura Piccardi; Liana Palermo; Federico Nemmi; Valentina Sulpizio; Gaspare Galati; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17

8.  Androgens and eye movements in women and men during a test of mental rotation ability.

Authors:  Gerianne M Alexander; Troy Son
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

10.  The Road More Travelled: The Differential Effects of Spatial Experience in Young and Elderly Participants.

Authors:  Antonella Lopez; Alessandro Germani; Luigi Tinella; Alessandro Oronzo Caffò; Albert Postma; Andrea Bosco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.