Literature DB >> 3964471

Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries.

J Sergent, J B Hellige.   

Abstract

This paper examines the implications of lateral tachistoscopic presentation of information for the processing efficiency of the intact cerebral hemispheres. Considering that the understanding of the processes underlying the particular competences of each hemisphere may require, as a preliminary step, the specification of the characteristics of the input on which the brain operates, anatomical, physiological, and psychophysical consequences of briefly stimulating the retinal periphery for the representation of information in the brain are outlined, with special reference to the spatial-frequency spectral composition of the stimuli. Retinal eccentricity and brief exposure duration converge to making the representation of information qualitatively different from the information that the brain normally operates on, which constrains the interpretation of findings with respect to the normal functions of the cerebral hemispheres. A review and discussion of empirical findings relevant to these issues suggest that manipulation of procedural variables may differentially affect the processing efficiency of the cerebral hemispheres and indicate that a given pattern of visual-field asymmetry may be overdetermined by a multitude of variables interacting in complex ways.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3964471     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  18 in total

1.  Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; E S Tukmachi; G Rockley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses.

Authors:  Jochen Müsseler; Peter Wühr; Claudia Danielmeier; Stefan Zysset
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.

Authors:  F L Kitterle; S Christman; J B Hellige
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

4.  Hemispheric asymmetry in temporal resolution: contribution of the magnocellular pathway.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

5.  Lateralised processing of the internal and the external facial features of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces: a visual half-field study.

Authors:  Edward H F De Haan; Evelien N M van Kollenburg
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-08-11

6.  Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings.

Authors:  F L Kitterle; L M Selig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

7.  Hemispheric differences in visual search of simple line arrays.

Authors:  J Polich; D P DeFrancesco; J F Garon; W Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

8.  Hemispheric differences in word-meaning processing: Alternative interpretations of current evidence.

Authors:  Wiltrud Fassbinder; Connie A Tompkins
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

9.  Hemisphericsymmetries in the identification of band-pass filtered letters Reply to Christman et al. (1997).

Authors:  D H Peterzell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

Review 10.  Future research directions in laterality.

Authors:  J G Beaumont
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.