| Literature DB >> 28114901 |
João Neiva1, Ester A Serrão2, Laura Anderson3, Peter T Raimondi3, Neusa Martins2, Licínia Gouveia2, Cristina Paulino2, Nelson C Coelho2, Kathy Ann Miller4, Daniel C Reed5, Lydia B Ladah6, Gareth A Pearson2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular markers are revealing a much more diverse and evolutionarily complex picture of marine biodiversity than previously anticipated. Cryptic and/or endemic marine species are continually being found throughout the world oceans, predominantly in inconspicuous tropical groups but also in larger, canopy-forming taxa from well studied temperate regions. Interspecific hybridization has also been found to be prevalent in many marine groups, for instance within dense congeneric assemblages, with introgressive gene-flow being the most common outcome. Here, using a congeneric phylogeographic approach, we investigated two monotypic and geographically complementary sister genera of north-east Pacific intertidal seaweeds (Hesperophycus and Pelvetiopsis), for which preliminary molecular tests revealed unexpected conflicts consistent with unrecognized cryptic diversity and hybridization.Entities:
Keywords: Allopolyploidy; Congeneric phylogeography; Cryptic species; Endemism; Fucaceae; Hesperophycus; Hybridization; Intertidal; NE Pacific; Pelvetiopsis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28114901 PMCID: PMC5260064 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0878-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Genealogical relationships of Pelvetiopsis spp. based on mtIGS data. a MtIGS haplotype network; the dots represent inferred, unsampled haplotypes and the small rectangles represent inferred indels. b Reconstructed 50% majority-rule consensus phylogenetic tree. Numbers above and below the branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.90) and maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (>70), respectively. For clarity, outgroup (Fucus) branches were collapsed (tip triangles), with the horizontal length of the triangle representing the distance from the branches’ common node to the tip of the longest branch
MtIGS divergence in Fucus and Pelvetiopsis
| Fucus | Pelvetiopsis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| distichus et al. | spiralis et al. | californica | arborescens | limitata | |
| distichus et al. | 0.029 ± 0.012 (3) |
| - | - | - |
| spiralis et al. | 0.023 ± 0.017 (10) | - | - | - | |
| californica | 0.010 ± 0.006 (3) |
|
| ||
| arborescens | (0) | 0.075 (1) | |||
| limitata | (0) | ||||
Kimura’s two-parameter (K2P) sequence distances (mean ± sd) within and between (bold) major mtIGS clades of Fucus (each defined by one case species, for complete list see Cánovas et al. 2011 [40]) and Pelvetiopsis. The number of sequence comparisons is shown in brackets. P. californica is a synonym of Hesperophycus californicus
Fig. 2Genotypic entities within Pelvetiopsis as assessed with microsatellite loci. a Structure plot for K = 3, showing inferred taxonomic entities at the bottom and mtDNA clades at the top. b FCA plot, with individuals labelled according to inferred genetic entities. Note the congruence between sequence and typing data and between different analyses
Fig. 3General morphology and shape of receptacles of Pelvetiopsis spp. a Hesperophycus californicus (=Pelvetiopsis californica), b P. limitata, c P. hybrida, and d P. arborescens
Fig. 4Inferred latitudinal distributions of Pelvetiopsis spp. Distributions based on the geographical origin of genetically-determined species samples (colour codes as in other figures), and also based in literature records. Note the overlapping ranges of species between Point Conception and Monterey Bay
Taxonomic update of Hesperophycus-Pelvetiopsis
| The original separation of the sister genera |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|