| Literature DB >> 28112740 |
Dominik Glodzik1, Sandro Morganella1, Helen Davies1, Peter T Simpson2, Yilong Li1, Xueqing Zou1, Javier Diez-Perez1, Johan Staaf3, Ludmil B Alexandrov1,4,5, Marcel Smid6, Arie B Brinkman7, Inga Hansine Rye8,9, Hege Russnes8,9, Keiran Raine1, Colin A Purdie10, Sunil R Lakhani2,11, Alastair M Thompson10,12, Ewan Birney13, Hendrik G Stunnenberg6, Marc J van de Vijver14, John W M Martens6, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale8,9, Andrea L Richardson15,16, Gu Kong17, Alain Viari18,19, Douglas Easton20, Gerard Evan21, Peter J Campbell1, Michael R Stratton1, Serena Nik-Zainal1,22.
Abstract
Somatic rearrangements contribute to the mutagenized landscape of cancer genomes. Here, we systematically interrogated rearrangements in 560 breast cancers by using a piecewise constant fitting approach. We identified 33 hotspots of large (>100 kb) tandem duplications, a mutational signature associated with homologous-recombination-repair deficiency. Notably, these tandem-duplication hotspots were enriched in breast cancer germline susceptibility loci (odds ratio (OR) = 4.28) and breast-specific 'super-enhancer' regulatory elements (OR = 3.54). These hotspots may be sites of selective susceptibility to double-strand-break damage due to high transcriptional activity or, through incrementally increasing copy number, may be sites of secondary selective pressure. The transcriptomic consequences ranged from strong individual oncogene effects to weak but quantifiable multigene expression effects. We thus present a somatic-rearrangement mutational process affecting coding sequences and noncoding regulatory elements and contributing a continuum of driver consequences, from modest to strong effects, thereby supporting a polygenic model of cancer development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28112740 PMCID: PMC5988034 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Genet ISSN: 1061-4036 Impact factor: 38.330