Piotr Błoński1, Jiří Tuček1, Zdeněk Sofer2, Vlastimil Mazánek2, Martin Petr1, Martin Pumera3, Michal Otyepka1, Radek Zbořil1. 1. Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc , 17. listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague , Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic. 3. Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University , 637371 Singapore.
Abstract
Nitrogen doping opens possibilities for tailoring the electronic properties and band gap of graphene toward its applications, e.g., in spintronics and optoelectronics. One major obstacle is development of magnetically active N-doped graphene with spin-polarized conductive behavior. However, the effect of nitrogen on the magnetic properties of graphene has so far only been addressed theoretically, and triggering of magnetism through N-doping has not yet been proved experimentally, except for systems containing a high amount of oxygen and thus decreased conductivity. Here, we report the first example of ferromagnetic graphene achieved by controlled doping with graphitic, pyridinic, and chemisorbed nitrogen. The magnetic properties were found to depend strongly on both the nitrogen concentration and type of structural N-motifs generated in the host lattice. Graphenes doped below 5 at. % of nitrogen were nonmagnetic; however, once doped at 5.1 at. % of nitrogen, N-doped graphene exhibited transition to a ferromagnetic state at ∼69 K and displayed a saturation magnetization reaching 1.09 emu/g. Theoretical calculations were used to elucidate the effects of individual chemical forms of nitrogen on magnetic properties. Results showed that magnetic effects were triggered by graphitic nitrogen, whereas pyridinic and chemisorbed nitrogen contributed much less to the overall ferromagnetic ground state. Calculations further proved the existence of exchange coupling among the paramagnetic centers mediated by the conduction electrons.
Nitrogen doping opens possibilities for tailoring the electronic properties and band gap of graphene toward its applications, e.g., in spintronics and optoelectronics. One major obstacle is development of magnetically active N-doped graphene with spin-polarized conductive behavior. However, the effect of nitrogen on the magnetic properties of graphene has so far only been addressed theoretically, and triggering of magnetism through N-doping has not yet been proved experimentally, except for systems containing a high amount of oxygen and thus decreased conductivity. Here, we report the first example of ferromagnetic graphene achieved by controlled doping with graphitic, pyridinic, and chemisorbed nitrogen. The magnetic properties were found to depend strongly on both the nitrogen concentration and type of structural N-motifs generated in the host lattice. Graphenes doped below 5 at. % of nitrogen were nonmagnetic; however, once doped at 5.1 at. % of nitrogen, N-doped graphene exhibited transition to a ferromagnetic state at ∼69 K and displayed a saturation magnetization reaching 1.09 emu/g. Theoretical calculations were used to elucidate the effects of individual chemical forms of nitrogen on magnetic properties. Results showed that magnetic effects were triggered by graphitic nitrogen, whereas pyridinic and chemisorbed nitrogen contributed much less to the overall ferromagnetic ground state. Calculations further proved the existence of exchange coupling among the paramagnetic centers mediated by the conduction electrons.
The successful isolation
of individual layers of graphene in 2004[1] has triggered an intense interest in its unique
structural and electronic properties.[2] A
very high carrier mobility along with weak spin–orbit and hyperfine
interactions predestinates graphene as a promising material for spintronics,
mainly if magnetic ordering can be introduced.[3] However, due to the delocalized π bonding network, ideal graphene
is intrinsically nonmagnetic. Therefore, developing effective methods
for synthesizing ferromagnetic (FM) graphene with high magnetization
is vital for applications in novel spintronic devices combining charge
and spin manipulation. A number of factors including atomic vacancies,
zigzag edges, sp3 functionalization, and
chemical doping of foreign atoms can induce localized magnetic moments
in graphene, which are indispensable for the existence of magnetic
ordering.[4−10] Among these strategies, doping of the graphene lattice with noncarbon
atoms has been identified as a promising approach for imprinting magnetic
ordering into graphene while preserving/enhancing its electric/optical
properties, as desirable for spintronic, optoelectronic, and magnetooptical
applications.Substitutional doping of graphene by light elements
has recently
attracted much attention (see, e.g., refs (11−14)). In particular,
nitrogen doping of the graphene lattice has been extensively studied,
aimed at tuning the graphene electronic features, and hence its physical
properties, in order to meet the requirements of a given application.
N-doped graphenes have been tested as active materials for Li-ion
batteries,[15] fuel cells,[12] field-effect transistors,[16] ultra-
and supercapacitors,[17,18] and in the fields of photocatalysis[19] and electrochemical biosensing.[20] Chaban and Prezhdo have argued[21] that graphene structures containing 1/3 of nitrogen atoms or less
should be stable up to 1000 K provided N–N bonds, which impair
the stability, are not formed. Having similar atomic size and one
additional electron compared to a carbon atom, nitrogen acts as an n-type (electron-donating) dopant by increasing the number
of electrons when substituted into the graphene lattice, thus affecting
the graphene electric conductivity. The substitution of carbon by
nitrogen atoms in the graphene lattice necessarily leads to changes
in the electronic density of states, and graphitic nitrogen can provide
π electrons close to the Fermi level of graphene. If the itinerant
electrons occupy narrow bands at the Fermi level, Stoner magnetism
can emerge, as recently shown for graphene doped with sulfur.[22] Indeed, it has been theoretically proposed[9] that depending on the concentration and packing
geometry of doping nitrogen atoms, it is possible to induce a magnetic
response in graphene. However, the physical mechanism governing the
emergence of magnetically ordered structures was not discussed. Until
now, all the experimental attempts to imprint magnetism into graphene
through N-doping have failed. Recently, a detailed theoretical and
experimental magnetic study revealed that introduction of pyrrolic
nitrogen into the graphene lattice decreases the magnetization values
compared to those observed for defective graphene.[10] In contrast, pyrrolic nitrogen (at a concentration of 6.02
at. %) was identified to enhance ferromagnetism in highly oxidized
graphene (i.e., graphene oxide) synthesized via hydrothermal reaction.[23] FM behavior has also been reported in other
nitrogen-doped graphene oxide systems.[24] However, N-doped graphene oxides are unsatisfactory because a high
amount of oxygen (sp3 functionalization)
is regarded as a dominant source of magnetism, overwhelming the effects
of nitrogen doping itself. Moreover, oxygen-containing functional
groups drastically reduce the electric conductivity of graphene–the
main prerequisite for spintronic technologies. Thus, development of
FM N-doped graphene with negligible oxygen content and elucidation
of the effect of various nitrogen configurations (pyrrolic, pyridinic,
graphitic, chemisorbed) remains a key challenge in the fields of nanotechnologies,
magnetism, and spintronics.[10,25,26]In this work, we first report the emergence of a magnetically
ordered
state in graphene doped solely with nitrogen. When the substitutional
level exceeded ∼5 at. % of nitrogen, the doping-induced paramagnetic
centers commenced to interact magnetically, resulting in establishment
of FM ordering at temperatures below ∼69 K. In the FM state,
the saturation magnetization reached ∼1.09 emu/g, which is
among the highest values reported so far for doped graphene-based
systems. DFT calculations demonstrated that graphitic nitrogen was
dominantly responsible for evolution of the magnetically active configurations.
In contrast, pyridinic and chemisorbed nitrogen had a considerably
lower effect on imprinting the magnetism into graphene. This finding
opens possibilities for an extensive research in spintronic and magnetooptical
technologies based on graphitic N-doped graphene.
Experimental Section
Materials
Graphite microparticles
(2–15 μm,
99.9995%, Alfa Aesar) were used for all syntheses. Sulfuric acid (98%),
nitric acid (68%), potassium chlorate (99%), hydrochloric acid (37%),
silver nitrate (99.5%), and barium nitrate (99.5%) were obtained from
Penta, Czech Republic. Nitrogen (99.9999% purity) and ammonia (99.9995%
purity) were obtained from SIAD, Czech Republic.
Synthesis of
Graphite Oxide
Graphite oxide was prepared
according to the Hofmann method. Briefly, sulfuric acid (98%, 87.5
mL) and nitric acid (68%, 27 mL) were added to a reaction flask (Pyrex
beaker with thermometer) containing a magnetic stir bar. The mixture
was cooled by immersion in an ice bath for 30 min. Graphite (5 g)
was then added to the mixture under vigorous stirring and, keeping
the reaction flask in the ice bath, potassium chlorate (55 g) was
slowly added. After a complete dissolution of potassium chlorate,
the reaction flask was loosely capped to allow the escape of gas evolved
and the mixture was continuously stirred for 96 h at room temperature.
The mixture was poured into 3 L of deionized water and decanted. The
obtained graphene oxide was then redispersed in HCl solution (5%,
3 L) to remove sulfate ions and repeatedly centrifuged and redispersed
in deionized water until a negative reaction on chloride and sulfate
ions with silver and barium nitrate was achieved. The resulting graphite
oxide was dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for 48 h.
Synthesis of
N-Doped Graphenes and Undoped Graphene
Nitrogen-doped graphenes
were prepared by combined exfoliation and
reduction of graphite oxide in an ammonia atmosphere. Briefly, 100
mg of graphite oxide was placed inside a quartz glass capsule connected
to a magnetic manipulator and mounted in a horizontal quartz glass
reactor. The reactor was repeatedly evacuated and flushed with nitrogen
followed by ammonia. Subsequently, the sample was inserted in the
hot zone of the reactor while the ammonia flow was kept at 1000 mL
min–1 and the pressure was 100 kPa. The temperature
of the sample was held constantly for 12 min at 400, 600 or 800 °C.
After removal from the hot zone of the reactor, the sample was cooled
in an ammonia atmosphere. The reactor was flushed with nitrogen before
sample removal. The GN0.015 sample was prepared at 400
°C, GN0.033 sample was prepared at 600 °C, and
GN0.051 sample was prepared at 800 °C; the subscript
reflects the level of nitrogen in the respective sample as identified
from the analysis of the respective survey X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
patterns. Importantly, the oxygen content was below 4 at. % in all
the samples studied. Compared to thermally reduced graphene oxide
(TRGO), used as a blank undoped sample, a slight increase in the oxygen
content can be explained in terms of competing processes of nitrogen
incorporation and reduction of graphite oxide.TRGO sample was
prepared at 800 °C by a similar procedure using only nitrogen
(1000 mL min–1) as an exfoliating atmosphere.
Characterization Techniques
The residual metal content
in the TRGO and N-doped graphene samples was analyzed by inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). An exact amount of sample
(10 mg) was immersed in concentrated nitric acid (≥99.999%
trace metals basis) and heated for 2 h at 100 °C. Afterward,
the mixture was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask, diluted
with water and any undissolved graphene was separated using a 200
nm Millipore filter. The measured concentration of metals in the solution
was recalculated to the amount in the tested sample (analogically,
diluted nitric acid was used as a blank).The atomic percent
of C, O, and N, and types of bonds were assessed by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS), employing a PHI 5000 VersaProbe II XPS system
(Physical Electronics) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα source (15 kV, 50 W) with a photon energy of 1486.7 eV. Dual beam
charge compensation was used for all the measurements. All the XPS
patterns were measured in a vacuum of 1.4 × 10–7 Pa and at room temperature (22 °C). For high resolution XPS
patterns, a pass energy of 23.500 eV and step size of 0.200 eV were
used. XPS patterns were evaluated with a MultiPak (Ulvac, PHI, Inc.)
software. All binding energy values were referenced to the C 1s peak
at 284.80 eV.Raman spectra were acquired using a DXR Raman
spectroscope (Thermo
Scientific, U.S.A.) equipped with a laser operating at a wavelength
of 633 nm. The respective sample was first deposited on a glass platform
and the excitation laser was focused on its surface. Experimental
parameters were tuned to maximize the respective analytic signal.
The laser power on the sample was set to 5 mW and the exposition time
was 20 s. Each measured Raman spectrum was an average of 16 experimental
microscans.Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and evolved gas
analysis (EGA)
curves were recorded using a Netzsch STA 449C Jupiter system with
an adapted QMS 403C Aëolos quadrupole mass spectrometer. TGA/EGA
measurements were performed in an open α-Al2O3 crucible under an argon atmosphere (80 cm3 min–1). A temperature program from 40 to 1000 °C with
a heating rate of 5 K min–1 was used.Magnetization
measurements of the TRGO and N-doped graphene samples
were performed using a physical property measurement system (PPMS)
equipped with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) from Quantum Design,
U.S.A. Hysteresis loops were measured over the temperature range from
5 to 300 K and under static external magnetic fields ranging from
−50 to +50 kOe. Temperature profiles of the mass magnetic susceptibility,
χmass, were recorded in a sweep mode over a temperature
range from 5 to 300 K in a field of 1 kOe after cooling in a field
of 1 kOe. Magnetization values were corrected assuming the response
of the sample holder, sample capsule, and respective Pascal constants.
Computational Details
Atomistic calculations were performed
using a spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) and projected
augmented wave potentials (PAW) representing atomic cores as implemented
in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP).[27−29] Electronic
exchange and correlation effects were treated by using the Perdew,
Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE)[30] generalized-gradient
approximation (GGA) with a plane wave cutoff of 600 eV. Brillouin
zone integrations were performed with a 6 × 6 × 1 Γ
point-centered Monkhorst–Pack k-point mesh
per conventional 4 × 3 rectangular cell (structure and cell optimization).
The electronic density of states was calculated using the tetrahedron
method[31] with a 21 × 21 × 1 k-point mesh. Partitioning of the ground state electronic
density into contributions attributed to the different atoms was performed
exploiting the Bader analysis.[32−34] Total magnetic moments were calculated
from the difference between the number of electrons in occupied majority-
and minority-spin states. Local magnetic moments were calculated by
projecting the plane-wave components of all the occupied eigenstates
onto spherical waves inside an atomic sphere and integrating the resulting
local density of states.A full structural optimization was
performed using a quasi-Newton algorithm until the residual atomic
forces were lower than 25 meV Å–1. Simultaneously,
the electronic and magnetic degrees of freedom were converged to an
energy of less than 10–6 eV. The stability of the
reported configurations was analyzed in terms of the formation energy, Ef, of the N-doped complexes using the formula
given as Ef = 1/n[Edpd – Egraph + n(μC – μN)], where Edpd and Egraph stand for the total energies of the doped and pristine
graphene sheet, respectively, μC and μN are the chemical potentials of C and N atoms, respectively
(here, approximated by the atomic energies of C and N), and n is the number of substituted atoms. A positive Ef indicates that the doping process is endothermic,
although it does not hinder the formation of thermodynamically stable
complexes.The adsorption energy (Ead) per N atom
(n = 1 and 2) on a pristine layer was calculated
as the total energy difference between the energy of an adatom-graphene
complex, EN/graph, a clean graphene layer, Egraph, and an isolated N atom in the gas-phase, EN, i.e., Ead = 1/n(EN/graph – Egraph – nEN). Here, a negative Ead indicates stable
structures. Similarly, the adsorption energy of on-surface nitrogen
on N-doped graphene was calculated as the total energy difference
between the energy of a doped graphene with an adatom, EN/dpd, a doped graphene sheet, Edpd, and a gas-phase N atom, i.e., Ead = EN/dpd – Edpd – EN.
Results
and Discussion
To study the role of N-doping on imprinting
magnetic features into
graphene, three samples differing in nitrogen content were prepared;
the level of doping was solely controlled by the temperature, while
all other synthetic parameters were kept constant. The TRGO sample
was synthesized as a reference blank sample for which no source of
nitrogen (i.e., ammonia atmosphere) was used during the thermal reduction
of graphite oxide. The reduction process was found to be highly efficient,
as evident from the very low content of oxygen (1 at. %, see the survey
and high-resolution C 1s XPS pattern in Figure S1a,b in Supporting Information). The paramagnetic/FM
response of graphene evolved due to defects and/or functionalization
is of several orders of magnitude lower compared to that of 3d-block metals, such as iron, cobalt, nickel, and manganese.
Hence, the results of magnetization measurements may be incorrectly
interpreted if these “strong” magnetic elements are
present in the system as a consequence of using reactants containing
3d-block metals and/or the sample handling.[35] Thus, ICP-MS was employed to quantify the presence
of 3d metal impurities and exclude their effect on
the magnetic properties of N-doped graphenes. The total concentration
of Fe, Ni, Co, and Mn, regarded as the main magnetic impurities in
TRGO and N-doped graphene samples, was below 10 ppm (see Table S1
in Supporting Information). Taking into
account the determined concentrations and magnetic moments of the
metal impurities, the total χmass of Fe, Ni, Co,
and Mn was estimated to be of the order of 10–8 emu
g–1 Oe–1 at 0 K and in a 1 kOe
field. As χmass values for TRGO and N-doped graphene
systems reached orders from 10–4 down to 10–6 emu g–1 Oe–1 in
a 1 kOe field (see below), the contribution of Fe, Ni, Co, and Mn
to the samples’ χmass was assumed to be negligible
in measurements of temperature evolution of χmass and hysteresis loops, thus definitely not overshadowing the magnetic
properties of graphene induced solely by nitrogen doping.Doping
of graphene with nitrogen was monitored by XPS and Raman
spectroscopy. In survey XPS patterns recorded for N-doped graphene
samples, peaks belonging to C, N, and O were clearly observed (see
Figure S2 and Table S2 in Supporting Information). The content of nitrogen was found to increase progressively with
the temperature at which the thermal reduction of graphite oxide in
the presence of ammonia was conducted (i.e., 400 °C, 1.5 at.
% of N; 600 °C, 3.3 at. % of N; 800 °C, 5.1 at. % of N).
The presence of nitrogen was further evidenced in the high-resolution
C 1s XPS profile, which showed the emergence of a peak at a binding
energy of around 285.5 eV corresponding to the C–N bond (see Figure a,c,e).[25] The C–N spectral component increased
in area with the level of N-doping. A small shift in the maximum of
the C–N peak witnessed for the three N-doped graphene samples
can be explained in terms of impossibility to distinguish differently
coordinated nitrogen atoms with carbon atoms in graphene with similar
binding energy values in the C 1s domain and the significant overlap
of the C–N and C–O spectral components. High-resolution
N 1s XPS patterns of N-doped graphene samples (see Figure and Figure S3 and Table S3
in Supporting Information) showed three
distinct peaks corresponding to nitrogen in different configurations
inside a graphene lattice or attached covalently to a graphene sheet
(see Figure ), i.e.,
pyridinic nitrogen (at ∼398.3 to ∼398.5 eV), graphitic
nitrogen (at ∼401.0 to ∼401.5 eV), and chemisorbed N/N2 (at ∼404.5 to ∼405.5 eV). In contrast, no traces
of pyrrolic nitrogen, usually present at ∼400.0 eV, were observed
(compare the high-resolution N 1s XPS patterns shown in Figure and Figure S3 in Supporting Information with Figure ).[36] The pyridinic and graphitic nitrogen were viewed as nitrogen incorporated
inside the graphene lattice, whereas chemisorbed N/N2 was
viewed as nitrogen adsorbed as adatoms. The presence of N/N2 was further confirmed by TGA and EGA techniques with gas electron
ionization mass spectrometry, indicating emission of a fragment with m/z = 28 (for N/N2) above 300
°C (see Figure S4 in Supporting Information). In addition, as no fragments with m/z = 30 and 48 were detected, the samples were considered free of any
NO and NO2 species, respectively. This agrees with the
analysis of the Raman spectra of N-doped graphene samples as no Raman
peaks around 1430 cm–1, characteristic for NO and
NO2 species,[36] are observed
(see Figure b,d,f).
Figure 1
High-resolution
C 1s XPS patterns of the (a) GN0.015, (c) GN0.033, (e) and GN0.051 sample with
bonds indicated. Raman spectra of the (b) GN0.015, (d)
GN0.033, and (f) GN0.051 sample with the ID/IG ratio indicated.
Figure 2
High-resolution N 1s XPS pattern of the GN0.051 sample
with peaks assigned to differently coordinated nitrogen.
Figure 3
Scheme showing different bonding configurations of nitrogen
in
N-doped graphene and corresponding peaks in a simulated high-resolution
N 1s XPS pattern.
High-resolution
C 1s XPS patterns of the (a) GN0.015, (c) GN0.033, (e) and GN0.051 sample with
bonds indicated. Raman spectra of the (b) GN0.015, (d)
GN0.033, and (f) GN0.051 sample with the ID/IG ratio indicated.High-resolution N 1s XPS pattern of the GN0.051 sample
with peaks assigned to differently coordinated nitrogen.Scheme showing different bonding configurations of nitrogen
in
N-doped graphene and corresponding peaks in a simulated high-resolution
N 1s XPS pattern.Raman spectra of the
GN0.015, GN0.033, GN0.051, and TRGO
sample are shown in Figure b,d,f and Figure S1c in Supporting Information. It can be seen that on increasing
the level of N-doping, the D-to-G band intensity ratio, ID/IG, increased. It is known
that if nitrogen enters the graphene lattice, the intensity of the
D-band, ID, in the Raman spectrum of graphene
is enhanced due to defects that emerge upon incorporation of nitrogen
into the graphene structure.[25] This provides
further evidence that under the synthetic conditions used, accommodation
of nitrogen into the graphene lattice was strongly favored over a
simple adsorption/addition process.If defects are introduced
into graphene, paramagnetic centers emerge
that may interact via suitable mediators (i.e., π-conduction
electrons, overlapping orbitals favoring superexchange mechanism,
etc.) to generate long-range magnetic ordering in the 2D lattice.
Under such conditions, the magnetic susceptibility of graphene, χ,
involves three contributions, i.e., χ = χdia + χpara + χferro, where χdia is the diamagnetic term including orbital, Landau and core
diamagnetic contributions, χpara is the paramagnetic
term including noninteracting (isolated) defect-induced paramagnetic
centers, Pauli paramagnetic contribution from conduction electron
and van Vleck contribution, and χferro is the FM
term describing the magnetic response of interacting defect-induced
paramagnetic centers.[37] As expected, pristine
TRGO behaved in a diamagnetic manner with only a tiny paramagnetic
response at low temperatures (see Figure S1d in Supporting Information) due to paramagnetic centers emerging
as a result of defects and/or the negligible content of oxygen functionalities,
which were most likely at the edges; the profile of χmass of TRGO well matched the modified Curie law, i.e., χmass = χmass,dia + C/T, where χmass,dia is the diamagnetic contribution, C is the Curie constant, and T is the temperature.Similarly, the temperature evolution of χmass measured
for the GN0.015 and GN0.033 sample also obeyed
the modified Curie law (see Figure a,b). The number of paramagnetic centers increased
upon increasing the level of N-doping, as expected and evidenced by
an enhanced paramagnetic Curie contribution (see insets in Figure a,b). However, N-doping
at such levels did not imprint any magnetic configuration (as confirmed
by theoretical calculations discussed below) and the induced paramagnetic
centers were far from each other, precluding the establishment of
a long-range magnetic ordering. Thus, the GN0.015 and GN0.033 sample showed dominant diamagnetic behavior, as also
witnessed from the isothermal magnetization curves measured at 5 K
(see insets in Figure a,b).
Figure 4
Temperature evolution of the mass magnetic susceptibility, χmass, of the (a) GN0.015 and (b) GN0.033 sample recorded under an external magnetic field of 1 kOe. The insets
in panel (a) and (b) show the temperature profile of χmass after subtraction of the diamagnetic component and behavior of the
5 K hysteresis loop of the GN0.015 and GN0.033 sample, respectively. (c) Temperature evolution of χmass for the GN0.051 sample recorded under an external magnetic
field of 1 kOe with the Curie temperature, TC, indicated. The insets show the trend of χmass at low temperatures and the temperature profile of the FM contribution,
χmass,ferro, derived from fitting the measured χmass. (d) Hysteresis loop of the GN0.051 sample
measured at a temperature of 5 K. The insets show the behavior of
the hysteresis loop around the origin with the coercivity marked and
field-dependent profiles of magnetization for the ferromagnetic, Mferro, and paramagnetic, Mpara, component derived from fitting the measured isothermal
magnetization curve. (e) Scheme showing different magnetic fractions
in the GN0.051 sample and their respective profiles of
χmass.
Temperature evolution of the mass magnetic susceptibility, χmass, of the (a) GN0.015 and (b) GN0.033 sample recorded under an external magnetic field of 1 kOe. The insets
in panel (a) and (b) show the temperature profile of χmass after subtraction of the diamagnetic component and behavior of the
5 K hysteresis loop of the GN0.015 and GN0.033 sample, respectively. (c) Temperature evolution of χmass for the GN0.051 sample recorded under an external magnetic
field of 1 kOe with the Curie temperature, TC, indicated. The insets show the trend of χmass at low temperatures and the temperature profile of the FM contribution,
χmass,ferro, derived from fitting the measured χmass. (d) Hysteresis loop of the GN0.051 sample
measured at a temperature of 5 K. The insets show the behavior of
the hysteresis loop around the origin with the coercivity marked and
field-dependent profiles of magnetization for the ferromagnetic, Mferro, and paramagnetic, Mpara, component derived from fitting the measured isothermal
magnetization curve. (e) Scheme showing different magnetic fractions
in the GN0.051 sample and their respective profiles of
χmass.Interestingly, for the GN0.051 sample, the temperature
profile of χmass was drastically different compared
to the GN0.015 and GN0.033 sample as it could
not be described by the modified Curie law. On lowering the temperature,
χmass showed a saturation tendency followed by an
abrupt increase, indicating two contributions, i.e., FM and paramagnetic
(see Figure c–e);
contrary to the graphene systems with a lower N-doping, the diamagnetic
term was found to be negligible here. The presence of both magnetic
fractions can be explained by assuming that the N-doped graphene sheets
within the sample contained nitrogen in different structural configurations,
which have a different impact on the magnetism of graphene, as predicted
by the theory discussed below. Moreover, it is known that even in
sheets showing FM behavior, isolated paramagnetic centers may evolve
owing to the presence of vacancies and defects of topological and
edge nature.[4−10] In order to fit the temperature evolution of χmass, the paramagnetic term was fitted using the Curie function (i.e.,
χmass = C/T) over
the whole temperature interval, whereas a model function involving
a combination of the Curie–Weiss law (i.e., χmass = C/(T – θ), where
θ is the Weiss temperature) at high temperatures and Brillouin
function within the mean-field approximation at low temperatures was
constructed to describe the FM contribution (see inset in Figure c). The fitting yielded
θ ≈ 69 K, angular momentum number J ≈
1.19, and a weight-normalized ratio of ferromagnetic-to-paramagnetic
contribution equal to 1.66. Note that the value of J is not an integral multiple of 0.5 as expected and must be treated
as an average over all the N-doped graphene sheets in the GN0.051 sample as the sheets can have different C–N configurations/arrangements
with different net magnetic moments (see below), as already reported
for N-doped and S-doped graphene systems.[22,24] Furthermore, θ can be assigned to the Curie temperature, TC, marking the transition from the paramagnetic
to FM regime on lowering the temperature. Thus, in accordance with
the theory, if the concentration of nitrogen exceeds a threshold value
(>5 at. % of N), magnetically active motifs inside the graphene
lattice
evolve, eventually leading to a magnetically ordered (i.e., FM) state
at low temperatures.Transition of graphene with ∼5.1
at. % of N to the low-temperature
FM regime was further confirmed by a series of hysteresis loops measured
over the temperature range from 5 to 300 K (see Figure d and Figure S5 in Supporting Information). At 5 K, the isothermal magnetization curve showed
hysteresis with a coercivity of ∼92 Oe (see inset in Figure d) and saturation
magnetization reaching 1.09 emu/g. The derived value of the saturation
magnetization is of identical order as reported for S-doped graphenes[22] and vertical graphenes,[38] which are regarded as the magnetically strongest carbon-based systems
prepared to date. The nonzero value of the coercivity implies that
N-doping imprints magnetic anisotropy on the graphene lattice, establishing
an easy axis of magnetization along which the magnetic moments of
the generated paramagnetic centers energetically prefer to lie. Following
the mathematical procedures of Liu et al.[24] and Tuček et al.[22] and assuming
the J value and weighted ferromagnetic-to-paramagnetic
ratio derived from the χmass vs T profile, we next attempted to separate the paramagnetic and FM contribution
in the 5 K isothermal magnetization curve (see inset in Figure d). The fitting yielded a saturation
magnetization of ∼0.65 emu/g and ∼0.37 emu/g for the
FM and paramagnetic contributions, respectively. On raising the temperature,
the coercivity decreased to zero (see inset in Figure S5b in Supporting Information) and the hysteresis was
lost at a temperature of ∼70 K (see Figure S5a in Supporting Information), indicating a transition
from the FM to paramagnetic regime.Thus, the experimental results
suggested that when the concentration
of nitrogen was increased and it became firmly embedded in the crystal
lattice of graphene, the number of induced paramagnetic centers increased,
eventually forming magnetically active motifs with conduction electrons
providing interaction pathways between them and establishing long-range
magnetic ordering upon decreasing the temperature. It was hypothesized
that upon further increasing the nitrogen concentration in the graphene
lattice, magnetic interactions would be strengthened, as reflected
by a shift of TC to higher temperature.
Moreover, the presence of more paramagnetic centers would enhance
the saturation magnetization, approaching the values observed for
S-doped and vertically oriented graphenes,[22,38] i.e., systems where the magnetic features are imprinted by defects.
Here, it should be stated that the observed ferromagnetism above 5
at. % of N was probably a consequence of the different nitrogen motifs
identified in the samples by XPS (graphitic, pyridinic, and chemisorbed
N/N2). Importantly, we did not identify pyrrolic nitrogen
in the samples, which has previously been shown to cause a fall in
magnetization values.[10]To decipher
the effect of nitrogen in various bonding configurations
(as identified by XPS, Figure and Figure S3 in Supporting Information) on the magnetic properties of graphene, we performed a first-principles[27−30] study of the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of
N-doped graphenes. The “magnetic contributions” of individual
N-motifs were also addressed in details. We used a rectangular graphene
cell containing 96 atoms, which was computationally tractable and
enabled the experimentally determined total and relative (among different
bonding configurations) content of nitrogen to be followed closely.
Specifically, we considered chemisorbed nitrogen (both N and N2) on the top of the graphene sheet and two graphitic and pyridinic
nitrogen atoms in the graphene lattice (see Figure ).
Figure 5
Top view of graphene doped with graphitic (in para configurations), trimerized pyridinic and chemisorbed
(a) N and
(b) N2 marked respectively by red, green, and magenta,
with positive (negative) spin densities plotted in blue (red) for
isosurfaces at ±1 × 10–3 (panel (a)) and
±2.5 × 10–4eÅ–3 (panel (b)). (c, d) The corresponding DOS plot for
configuration shown in panel (a) and panel (b), respectively.
Top view of graphene doped with graphitic (in para configurations), trimerized pyridinic and chemisorbed
(a) N and
(b) N2 marked respectively by red, green, and magenta,
with positive (negative) spin densities plotted in blue (red) for
isosurfaces at ±1 × 10–3 (panel (a)) and
±2.5 × 10–4eÅ–3 (panel (b)). (c, d) The corresponding DOS plot for
configuration shown in panel (a) and panel (b), respectively.The computational data fully supported
the experimental results.
In particular, the energetically most stable structures, as presented
in Figure a,b, exhibited
FM ordering with 1.3 and 0.3 μB magnetic moment per
supercell for N and N2, respectively, chemisorbed on the
graphene surface. The density of state (DOS) plots presented in Figure c,d indicated exchange
coupling mediated by the conduction electrons. Moreover, the strong
spin-polarized electron features at the Fermi level in the DOS structures
showed a predominant contribution from the graphitic N atoms, which
highlights their important role in developing Stoner-like magnetism
in N-doped graphenes.[22,39] It should be noted that depending
on the position of nitrogen on the graphene surface with respect to
the graphitic and pyridinic nitrogen atoms, a large number of possible
magnetic configurations were found with a varying effective magnetic
moment per cell and exhibiting both FM and antiferromagnetic behavior
or even disappearance of magnetic order. This may explain the complexity
of the magnetic measurements discussed above for the GN0.051 sample, as the experimental response represented an average over
a large number of structures with different net magnetic moments.Thus, to understand the role and contribution of individual nitrogen
motifs in triggering magnetism in N-doped graphenes, we carried out
an extensive set of additional calculations with a smaller cell containing
48 atoms. The magnetic properties of graphene doped with graphitic
nitrogen exhibited a strong dependence on both the nitrogen concentration
and configurations. Nonmagnetic ground state structures doped by 2.1,
4.2, and 6.25 at. % of graphitic nitrogen (the percentages used result
from the size of the cell employed in the calculations) are shown
in Figure S6 in Supporting Information.
The magnetism of graphene doped with graphitic nitrogen has been attributed
to delocalized electrons occupying narrow peaks at the Fermi level
(EF).[22,39] Graphene doped
with 2.1 at. % of nitrogen was predicted to be nonmagnetic, in accord
with DFT calculations by Wang et al.,[9] and
the narrow electron donor states near EF were absent in the partial density of states (PDOS). At 4.2 at.
% of nitrogen, the computational screening identified a magnetic structure
with a magnetic moment of ∼0.2 μB per supercell
in which N atoms substituted C atoms at para positions
(see Figure ). The
same motif was responsible for triggering ferromagnetism in the larger
96-atom cell, which highlights the importance of the graphitic nitrogen
motif in imprinting FM order in N-doped graphene. N-doping generating
the FM state gave rise to a strong p electron peak at the Fermi level in the electronic
structure according to PDOS, similar to recent reports for graphene
doped with 4.2 at. % of sulfur.[22] The magnetic
polarization was confined to a narrow part of the cell, in zigzag
directions between the doping atoms, as can be seen in the inset in Figure presenting isosurfaces
of spin densities. Importantly, formation of zigzag edges by cutting
graphene along a certain crystallographic direction has been shown
to give rise to peculiar edge localized states near the Fermi level
responsible for the spontaneous formation of magnetic ordering in
graphene nanoribbons.[40]
Figure 6
Partial densities of
states calculated for graphene doped with
nitrogen embedded in the lattice at para positions
at a concentration of 4.2 at. %. The supercell is shown in the inset,
where an isosurface of spin-density plotted at ±5 × 10–4eÅ–3 is also
displayed.
Partial densities of
states calculated for graphene doped with
nitrogen embedded in the lattice at para positions
at a concentration of 4.2 at. %. The supercell is shown in the inset,
where an isosurface of spin-density plotted at ±5 × 10–4eÅ–3 is also
displayed.The DFT calculations also suggested
that at 6.25 at. % of graphitic
nitrogen, a greater number of magnetic configurations with the magnetic
moment varying between 0.1 and 0.8 μB/supercell (see Figure and Figure S7 in Supporting Information) were produced. These
magnetic structures contained two N atoms in the meta configuration embedded in the graphene lattice. The magnetic behavior
of this system could be tuned by changing the position of the third
N atom in the host lattice as it stayed on the zigzag paths between
the other two N atoms. Finally, because of the similar atomic sizes
of nitrogen and carbon atoms, incorporation of nitrogen into the honeycomb
network of graphene did not lead to any significant distortion of
the host lattice. In-plane atomic displacements caused by nitrogen
were below 2% of the C–C distance of pristine graphene and
the system remained planar. Strain-induced magnetism in N-doped graphene
was thus excluded.
Figure 7
Top view of graphene doped with nitrogen at a concentration
of
6.25 at. %. Positive (negative) spin densities are plotted in blue
(red) for isosurfaces at ±5 × 10–4eÅ–3: (a) 0.1, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.7,
(d) 0.8, (e) 0.4, and (f) 0.6 μB per supercell.
Top view of graphene doped with nitrogen at a concentration
of
6.25 at. %. Positive (negative) spin densities are plotted in blue
(red) for isosurfaces at ±5 × 10–4eÅ–3: (a) 0.1, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.7,
(d) 0.8, (e) 0.4, and (f) 0.6 μB per supercell.We also considered the effect
of nitrogen atoms substituting carbons
in the graphene lattice (employing a 48-atom graphene cell) on pyrrolic
bonding sites. A single pyrrolic nitrogen in graphene occupied a site
inside the pentagonal ring in the vicinity of single vacancy (SV)
or divacancy (DV) defect (see Figure S8a,b in Supporting Information). Substitution by monomeric pyrrolic
nitrogen did not result in any long-range magnetic order. Importantly,
replacing one of the C atoms participating in the reconstructed C–C
bond with an N atom led to opening of the 5-membered ring and S = 1/2 paramagnetism[41] due to
the carbon dangling bond. Such a bonding configuration transformed
the initial pyrrolic nitrogen into pyridinic nitrogen (see Figure
S8c,d in Supporting Information). We also
considered the effect of adding pyrrolic nitrogen inside the octagonal
ring of the DV defect (Figure S8e,f in Supporting Information), as proposed in the work of Li et al.[23] The present calculations indicated that the
nitrogen atom moved to the neighboring 5-membered ring, in accord
with the study by Lin et al.,[42] forming
a 6-membered ring upon relaxation in which nitrogen (transformed into
pyridinic) was nonmagnetic.Next, we considered the role of
pyridinic nitrogen, which was also
identified as an important motif in the experimental samples. Besides
monomeric pyridinic nitrogen (S = 0 or S = 1/2 due to carbon dangling bonds), we also considered dimerized
(with S = 1/2 magnetic moment due to carbon dangling
bond) and trimerized pyridinic nitrogen (with a magnetic moment of
0.3 μB per supercell). Note that the calculated ground
state arrangements of multiple pyridinic nitrogen in the graphene
lattice were in agreement with annular dark-field imaging reported
in the work by Lin et al.[42] However, according
to DOS of the trimerized pyridinic nitrogen (see Figure S9 in Supporting Information), the electronic structure
indicated that indirect exchange mediated by the conduction electrons
was strongly compromised compared to the exchange coupling developed
for graphene doped with graphitic nitrogen (compare Figure and Figure S9 in Supporting Information). This is in line with
the suppressed magnetic moment of trimerized pyridinic nitrogen in
comparison to that of trimerized graphitic nitrogen (see the structure
presented in Figure f and DOS plot in Figure S7f in Supporting Information). It is also important to mention that half-metallic properties
were recently predicted for the graphene-based C4N3 polymer,[43] i.e., a 2D radical
polymer containing many trimerized pyridinic nitrogens. In contrast,
the DOS plot presented in Figure S9 in Supporting Information showed finite (nonzero) density of states above EF in both spin-up and spin-down channel, which
is most likely due to a significantly lower concentration of trimerized
pyridinic nitrogen in the present study.Finally, we investigated
whether magnetism in graphene can also
be induced by nitrogen adatoms/molecule, which were identified in
the XPS patterns and TGA/EGA measurements. Thus, structures resulting
from both nitrogen additions on a pristine graphene layer and simultaneous
single nitrogen atom addition and graphitic substitution were analyzed
(see Figure S10 and Figure S11 in Supporting Information).A single N-adatom carried a magnetic moment of 0.5 μB, which can be understood based on an electron counting argument:
two valence electrons formed covalent bonds with neighboring C atoms,
two formed a lone-pair, and the fifth valence electron gave rise to
the magnetic moment. However, the substrate atoms remained nonmagnetic.
Adding another nitrogen atom contributed 0.5 μB,
but no magnetic moments were induced on the C atoms. By placing another
nitrogen atom in a close proximity to the preadsorbed adatom, an N2 dimer spontaneously formed, which was adsorbed over the surface
and had zero magnetic moment. Adatom addition on graphene containing
2.1 at. % of graphitic nitrogen (see Figure S11 in Supporting Information) also did not induce a magnetic response
in the system.To conclude, the computational study allowed
elucidation of the
synergistic effect of nitrogen atoms in various bonding configurations,
as evidenced from high-resolution XPS data. To follow closely the
total and relative content of nitrogen in the experimentally prepared
samples, we considered graphitic nitrogen in the para configuration, which turned out to promote formation of the motif
most important for imprinting magnetism in graphene, followed by trimerized
pyridinic nitrogen and chemisorbed N adatoms. In the ground state,
the structure resulting from the combined effects of all these species
is strongly FM. However, it should be noted that coupling between
pyridinic nitrogens is much less effective in maintaining the FM structure,
and chemisorbed nitrogen adatoms can only generate paramagnetism.
Further, chemisorbed N2 only results in a nonmagnetic states.
Finally, pyrrolic nitrogen has no effect on magnetism in graphene,
in line with the work by Ito et al.,[10] who
reported a decrease in the magnetization values with increasing concentration
of pyrrolic nitrogen in the graphene lattice.
Conclusions
In
summary, on the basis of electronic-structure calculations and
magnetization measurements, we have provided new insights into the
role of nitrogen as a highly electronegative n-type
dopant for imprinting the magnetic properties to graphene. The magnetic
features of N-doped graphene depend on both the nitrogen concentration
and the configuration in the host lattice, with a complex interplay
between graphitic, pyridinic, and chemisorbed nitrogen. Among these
structural motifs, graphitic nitrogen plays the principal magnetic
role, as corroborated by DFT calculations. Importantly, below 5 at.
% of nitrogen, graphene behaves dominantly as a diamagnet; paramagnetic
centers are induced upon doping; however, they do not produce magnetically
active motifs. If the doping concentration is increased above the
threshold doping value, magnetic interactions mediated by the conduction
electron system emerge between the substitution-generated paramagnetic
centers. Experimentally, graphene doped with nitrogen at a concentration
level of 5.1 at. % shows a transition to an FM state at the Curie
temperature of ∼69 K and saturation magnetization reaching
1.09 emu/g. Such a high value of the saturation magnetization ranks
N-doped graphenes among the magnetically strongest graphene-based
systems developed so far for which the magnetic properties are imprinted
by defects. As N-doping is also expected to maintain or even improve
the electric (i.e., conduction) features of graphene, the present
work opens possibilities for further optimization of N-doped graphenes
(e.g., exclusive presence of graphitic nitrogen) to produce new kinds
of spintronic materials.
Authors: Eun Cheol Lee; Young Cheol Choi; Woo Youn Kim; N Jiten Singh; Sik Lee; Ji Hoon Shim; Kwang S Kim Journal: Chemistry Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov Journal: Science Date: 2004-10-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: R R Nair; I-L Tsai; M Sepioni; O Lehtinen; J Keinonen; A V Krasheninnikov; A H Castro Neto; M I Katsnelson; A K Geim; I V Grigorieva Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Giuseppe Valerio Bianco; Alberto Sacchetti; Marco Grande; Antonella D'Orazio; Antonella Milella; Giovanni Bruno Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Thi Tan Pham; Thanh Ngoc Pham; Viorel Chihaia; Quang Anh Vu; Thuat T Trinh; Trung Thanh Pham; Le Van Thang; Do Ngoc Son Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Jeff M Van Raden; Dimitris I Alexandropoulos; Michael Slota; Simen Sopp; Taisuke Matsuno; Amber L Thompson; Hiroyuki Isobe; Harry L Anderson; Lapo Bogani Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 16.383
Authors: Bruno de la Torre; Martin Švec; Prokop Hapala; Jesus Redondo; Ondřej Krejčí; Rabindranath Lo; Debashree Manna; Amrit Sarmah; Dana Nachtigallová; Jiří Tuček; Piotr Błoński; Michal Otyepka; Radek Zbořil; Pavel Hobza; Pavel Jelínek Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 14.919