| Literature DB >> 28109322 |
Ying Chen1,2, He Wang3, Wenyi Lin4, Ping Shuai5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the role of RNA-dependent adenosine deaminase (ADAR1) in cervical squamous cell carcinoma occurrence and progression.Entities:
Keywords: Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA1; Cervical squamous cancer; Risk factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28109322 PMCID: PMC5251241 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-017-0600-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Fig. 1Immunohistochemistry (IHC) data showing ADAR1 expression levels in normal cervical, CIN, and cervical squamous cancer tissue specimens. a Normal squamous epithelium (IHC × 200); b Uterine neck CIN III (IHC × 200); c Cervical keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (IHC × 200); d Cervicalnon-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (IHC × 200). e Perineural invasion exhibited messy and irregular next to cervical squamous cell carcinoma lesion (IHC × 200)
One-factor analysis of ADAR1
| Characteristics | Case ( | Negative | Positive |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menopause | 0.144 | |||
| Yes | 68 | 16(38.23%) | 52(76.47%) | |
| No | 102 | 15(14.71%) | 87(85.29%) | |
| Gravidity | 0.212 | |||
| < 3 | 36 | 4(11.11%) | 32(88.89%) | |
| ≥ 3 | 134 | 27(20.15%) | 107(79.85%) | |
| Clinical stage | 0.224 | |||
| I | 116 | 24(20.69%) | 92(79.31%) | |
| IIA | 54 | 7(12.96%) | 47(87.04%) | |
| Tumor diameter | 0.000** | |||
| ≤ 4 cm | 96 | 27(28.13%) | 69(71.88%) | |
| > 4 cm | 74 | 4(5.41%) | 70(94.59%) | |
| Keratinization | 0.079 | |||
| Yes | 90 | 12(13.33%) | 78(86.67%) | |
| No | 80 | 19(23.75%) | 61(76.25%) | |
| Horizontal diffusion diameter | 0.000** | |||
| ≤ 4 cm | 102 | 28(27.45%) | 74(72.55%) | |
| > 4 cm | 68 | 3(4.41%) | 65(95.59%) | |
| Stroma invasion | 0.612 | |||
| Superficial stroma | 8 | 2(25.00%) | 6(75.00%) | |
| Deep stroma | 162 | 29(17.90%) | 133(82.10%) | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.008* | |||
| Negative | 36 | 12(33.33%) | 24(66.67%) | |
| Positive | 134 | 19(14.18%) | 115(85.82%) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.076 | |||
| Negative | 54 | 14(25.93%) | 40(74.07%) | |
| Positive | 116 | 17(88.73%) | 99(85.34%) | |
| Parametrial invasion | 0.023* | |||
| Negative | 126 | 28(22.22%) | 98(77.78%) | |
| Positive | 44 | 3(6.82%) | 41(93.18%) | |
| Parametrial margin | 0.855 | |||
| Negative | 152 | 28(18.42%) | 124(81.58%) | |
| Positive | 18 | 3(16.67%) | 15(83.33%) | |
| Vagina margin | 0.001** | |||
| Negative | 80 | 23(28.75%) | 57(71.25%) | |
| Positive | 90 | 8(88.89%) | 82(91.11%) | |
| Histological grade | 0.318 | |||
| G1 | 30 | 6(20.00%) | 24(80.00%) | |
| G2 | 52 | 6(11.54%) | 46(88.46%) | |
| G3 | 88 | 19(21.59%) | 69(78.41%) | |
| HPV infection | 0.955 | |||
| Negative | 16 | 3(18.75%) | 13(81.25%) | |
| Positive | 154 | 28(18.18%) | 126(81.82%) | |
| PNI | 0.011* | |||
| Negative | 31 | 31(100.00%) | 0(0.00%) | |
| Positive | 139 | 114(82.01%) | 25(17.99%) |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 2Overall survival curve of patients with ADAR1 positive and ADAR1 negative cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Survival time of ADAR1 positive group was 38.252 ± 1. 301 month, survival time of ADAR1 negative group was 45.458 ± 0. 863 months. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 5.101, p = 0.024). 0 = ADAR1 negative group; 1 = ADAR1 positive group
Fig. 3Disease-free survival curve of patients with ADAR1 positive and ADAR1 negative cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Overall disease-free survival time was 39.048 ± 1.118 months. Disease-free survival time of ADAR1 negative group was 45.458 ± 0.863 months, disease-free survival time of ADAR1 positive group was 34.877 ± 1.408. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 12.925, p < 0.001). 0 = ADAR1 negative group; 1 = ADAR1positive group
Multivariate analysis of the predictive value of cervical squamous cell carcinoma overall survival for each variable clinical case
| Variables | B | S.E. | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95% CIfor EXP (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| PNI | -.295 | .634 | .217 | 1 | .641 | .744 | .215 | 2.579 |
| Tumor diameter | .407 | .454 | 0820 | 1 | .370 | .666 | .212 | 2.969 |
| Horizontal diffusion | -.231 | .673 | .118 | 1 | .732 | .794 | 1.183 | 15.581 |
| Vessel invasion | .016 | .572 | .001 | 1 | .978 | 1.016 | .331 | 3.115 |
| Parametrial invasion | 1.090 | .401 | 7.411 | 1 | .006* | 2.976 | 1.357 | 6.525 |
| Vagina involvement | -.173 | .574 | .091 | 1 | .763 | .841 | .273 | 2.590 |
| Constant | -.277 | 1.039 | .071 | 1 | .790 | .758 | ||
*p < 0.05
PNI pathologically diagnostic criteria for perineural invasion
B coefficient of regression
S.E standard error
Wald Wald Chi-Square
df degree of freedom
sig statistically significant
EXP(B) B coefficient index
95% CI for EXP (B) 95% confidence interval
OR odds ratio