Literature DB >> 28109093

[Clinical efficacy and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a multicenter retrospective study].

Xue-Yuan Li1, Yue-Wen Guo, Yan-Wen Xu, Bin Zhu, Xue-Xue Wu, Xiang Chen, Xiao-Yi Wang, Dun-Jin Chen, Hui Chen, Jian-Ping Zhang, Zhi-Jian Wang, Sheng-Li An.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone insert for term labor induction in the Pearl River Delta of Guangdong province.
METHODS: Twenty hospitals using controlled-release dinoprostone insert for term labor induction in the Pearl River Delta of Guangdong province were stratified into provincial hospitals and municipal hospitals, and three hospitals of each level were selected as research units. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1390 pregnant women receiving term labor induction using controlled-release dinoprostone insert were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the the effectiveness and safety with another 957 pregnant women with induced abortion using oxytocin as the control group.
RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the controlled-release dinoprostone insert group showed a significantly longer length of the latent phase of labor (4.06∓2.65 vs 3.20∓2.08 h, P=0.003, 95%CI [0.182, 0.920]) and shorter lengths of the active phase (1.73∓1.32 vs 2.22∓1.75 h, P=0.000, 95%CI [-0.795, -0.363]) and the second stage of labor (0.49∓0.37 vs 0.54∓0.43 h, P=0.003, 95%CI [-0.137, -0.028]). No significant differences were found in the length of the first stage of labor, the vaginal delivery rate, adverse reactions, or fetal outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Controlled-release dinoprostone insert is effective and safe for labor induction at term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28109093      PMCID: PMC6765749     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  20 in total

1.  Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Jay M Bolnick; Maria D Velazquez; Jose L Gonzalez; Valerie J Rappaport; Gena McIlwain-Dunivan; William F Rayburn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.

Authors:  Richard Bernhard Mayer; Peter Oppelt; Omar Shebl; Joachim Pömer; Christina Allerstorfer; Christoph Weiss
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 3.  Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Edna Keeney; Therese Dowswell; Nicky J Welton; Nancy Medley; Sofia Dias; Leanne V Jones; Gillian Gyte; Deborah M Caldwell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Chuying Du; Yukun Liu; Yinglin Liu; Hong Ding; Rui Zhang; Jianping Tan
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter.

Authors:  Antonella Cromi; Fabio Ghezzi; Stefano Uccella; Massimo Agosti; Maurizio Serati; Giulia Marchitelli; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Patrizio Antonazzo; Arianna Laoreti; Carlo Personeni; Elena Grossi; Anna Martinelli; Irene Cetin
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.060

7.  The efficacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  I Bezircioglu; M K Akin; A Baloglu; M Bicer
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.146

8.  A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.

Authors:  Farnaz K Aghideh; Patrick M Mullin; Sue Ingles; Joseph G Ouzounian; Neisha Opper; Melissa L Wilson; David A Miller; Richard H Lee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-08-27

9.  Effects of intravaginally inserted controlled-release dinoprostone and oxytocin for labor induction on umbilical cord blood gas parameters.

Authors:  Hüseyin Levent Keskin; Gökalp Kabacaoğlu; Elçin İşlek Seçen; Işık Ustüner; Gülin Yeğin; Ayşe Filiz Avşar
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Maternal serum progesterone, estradiol and estriol levels in successful dinoprostone-induced labor.

Authors:  C K Konopka; E N Morais; D Naidon; A M Pereira; M A Rubin; J F Oliveira; C F Mello
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.