Literature DB >> 25808892

Binding space and time through action.

N Binetti1, N Hagura2, C Fadipe2, A Tomassini3, V Walsh2, S Bestmann3.   

Abstract

Space and time are intimately coupled dimensions in the human brain. Several lines of evidence suggest that space and time are processed by a shared analogue magnitude system. It has been proposed that actions are instrumental in establishing this shared magnitude system. Here we provide evidence in support of this hypothesis, by showing that the interaction between space and time is enhanced when magnitude information is acquired through action. Participants observed increases or decreases in the height of a visual bar (spatial magnitude) while judging whether a simultaneously presented sequence of acoustic tones had accelerated or decelerated (temporal magnitude). In one condition (Action), participants directly controlled the changes in bar height with a hand grip device, whereas in the other (No Action), changes in bar height were externally controlled but matched the spatial/temporal profile of the Action condition. The sign of changes in bar height biased the perceived rate of the tone sequences, where increases in bar height produced apparent increases in tone rate. This effect was amplified when the visual bar was actively controlled in the Action condition, and the strength of the interaction was scaled by the magnitude of the action. Subsequent experiments ruled out that this was simply explained by attentional factors, and additionally showed that a monotonic mapping is also required between grip force and bar height in order to bias the perception of the tones. These data provide support for an instrumental role of action in interfacing spatial and temporal quantities in the brain.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATOM; crossmodal correspondence; magnitudes; temporal estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808892      PMCID: PMC4389624          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  50 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Prismatic adaptation effects on spatial representation of time in neglect patients.

Authors:  Massimiliano Oliveri; Barbara Magnani; Alessandra Filipelli; Stefano Avanzi; Francesca Frassinetti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Chris L E Paffen; Hinze Hogendoorn; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A common right fronto-parietal network for numerosity and duration processing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Valérie Dormal; Giulia Dormal; Frédéric Joassin; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Adaptive tuning of perceptual timing to whole body motion.

Authors:  Nicola Binetti; Isabelle A Siegler; Domenica Bueti; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Ready steady slow: action preparation slows the subjective passage of time.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hagura; Ryota Kanai; Guido Orgs; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Space-time relations: effects of time on perceived visual extent.

Authors:  J C Bill; L W Teft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  3 in total

1.  Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Compatibility between object size and response side in grasping: the left hand prefers smaller objects, the right hand prefers larger objects.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Peter Wühr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; David C Burr; Marika Iaia; Chiara V Marinelli; Paola Angelelli; Marco Turi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.