Literature DB >> 28108306

Bone remodeling as a spatial evolutionary game.

Marc D Ryser1, Kevin A Murgas2.   

Abstract

Bone remodeling is a complex process involving cell-cell interactions, biochemical signaling and mechanical stimuli. Early models of the biological aspects of remodeling were non-spatial and focused on the local dynamics at a fixed location in the bone. Several spatial extensions of these models have been proposed, but they generally suffer from two limitations: first, they are not amenable to analysis and are computationally expensive, and second, they neglect the role played by bone-embedded osteocytes. To address these issues, we developed a novel model of spatial remodeling based on the principles of evolutionary game theory. The analytically tractable framework describes the spatial interactions between zones of bone resorption, bone formation and quiescent bone, and explicitly accounts for regulation of remodeling by bone-embedded, mechanotransducing osteocytes. Using tools from the theory of interacting particle systems we systematically classified the different dynamic regimes of the spatial model and identified regions of parameter space that allow for global coexistence of resorption, formation and quiescence, as observed in physiological remodeling. In coexistence scenarios, three-dimensional simulations revealed the emergence of sponge-like bone clusters. Comparison between spatial and non-spatial dynamics revealed substantial differences and suggested a stabilizing role of space. Our findings emphasize the importance of accounting for spatial structure and bone-embedded osteocytes when modeling the process of bone remodeling. Thanks to the lattice-based framework, the proposed model can easily be coupled to a mechanical model of bone loading.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone physiology; Interacting particle systems; Osteoblasts; Osteoclasts; Osteocytes; Spatial evolutionary games; Trabecular remodeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108306      PMCID: PMC5362252          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  43 in total

1.  Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling.

Authors:  Vincent Lemaire; Frank L Tobin; Larry D Greller; Carolyn R Cho; Larry J Suva
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Liza J Raggatt; Nicola C Partridge
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Modelling the anabolic response of bone using a cell population model.

Authors:  Pascal R Buenzli; Peter Pivonka; Bruce S Gardiner; David W Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Osteocytes as a record of bone formation dynamics: a mathematical model of osteocyte generation in bone matrix.

Authors:  Pascal R Buenzli
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Disorders of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Xu Feng; Jay M McDonald
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 6.  Bone resorption by osteoclasts.

Authors:  S L Teitelbaum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Transforming growth factor beta affects osteoclast differentiation via direct and indirect actions.

Authors:  J M Quinn; K Itoh; N Udagawa; K Hausler; H Yasuda; N Shima; A Mizuno; K Higashio; N Takahashi; T Suda; T J Martin; M T Gillespie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Mathematical modeling of spatio-temporal dynamics of a single bone multicellular unit.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Nilima Nigam; Svetlana V Komarova
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Cancer phenotype as the outcome of an evolutionary game between normal and malignant cells.

Authors:  D Dingli; F A C C Chalub; F C Santos; S Van Segbroeck; J M Pacheco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Osteoprotegerin in bone metastases: mathematical solution to the puzzle.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Yiding Qu; Svetlana V Komarova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Spatial evolutionary games with weak selection.

Authors:  Mridu Nanda; Richard Durrett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Integrated computational and in vivo models reveal Key Insights into macrophage behavior during bone healing.

Authors:  Etienne Baratchart; Chen Hao Lo; Conor C Lynch; David Basanta
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 3.  Relevance of Notch Signaling for Bone Metabolism and Regeneration.

Authors:  Tobias M Ballhause; Shan Jiang; Anke Baranowsky; Sabine Brandt; Peter R Mertens; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Timur Yorgan; Johannes Keller
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Acupotomy Contributes to Suppressing Subchondral Bone Resorption in KOA Rabbits by Regulating the OPG/RANKL Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Tong Wang; Yan Guo; Xiao-Wei Shi; Yang Gao; Jia-Yi Zhang; Chun-Jiu Wang; Xue Yang; Qi Shu; Xi-Lin Chen; Xin-Yi Fu; Wen-Shan Xie; Yi Zhang; Bin Li; Chang-Qing Guo
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.