Literature DB >> 22579551

Modelling the anabolic response of bone using a cell population model.

Pascal R Buenzli1, Peter Pivonka, Bruce S Gardiner, David W Smith.   

Abstract

To maintain bone mass during bone remodelling, coupling is required between bone resorption and bone formation. This coordination is achieved by a network of autocrine and paracrine signalling molecules between cells of the osteoclastic lineage and cells of the osteoblastic lineage. Mathematical modelling of signalling between cells of both lineages can assist in the interpretation of experimental data, clarify signalling interactions and help develop a deeper understanding of complex bone diseases. Several mathematical models of bone cell interactions have been developed, some including RANK-RANKL-OPG signalling between cells and systemic parathyroid hormone PTH. However, to our knowledge these models do not currently include key aspects of some more recent biological evidence for anabolic responses. In this paper, we further develop a mathematical model of bone cell interactions by Pivonka et al. (2008) to include the proliferation of precursor osteoblasts into the model. This inclusion is important to be able to account for Wnt signalling, believed to play an important role in the anabolic responses of bone. We show that an increased rate of differentiation to precursor cells or an increased rate of proliferation of precursor osteoblasts themselves both result in increased bone mass. However, modelling these different processes separately enables the new model to represent recent experimental discoveries such as the role of Wnt signalling in bone biology and the recruitment of osteoblast progenitor cells by transforming growth factor β. Finally, we illustrate the power of the new model's capabilities by applying the model to prostate cancer metastasis to bone. In the bone microenvironment, prostate cancer cells are believed to release some of the same signalling molecules used to coordinate bone remodelling (i.e.,Wnt and PTHrP), enabling the cancer cells to disrupt normal signalling and coordination between bone cells. This disruption can lead to either bone gain or bone loss. We demonstrate that the new computational model developed here is capable of capturing some key observations made on the evolution of the bone mass due to metastasis of prostate cancer to the bone microenvironment. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22579551     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  13 in total

Review 1.  Translational Quantitative Systems Pharmacology in Drug Development: from Current Landscape to Good Practices.

Authors:  Jane P F Bai; Justin C Earp; Venkateswaran C Pillai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Bone remodeling as a spatial evolutionary game.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Kevin A Murgas
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  An integrative model of prostate cancer interaction with the bone microenvironment.

Authors:  A Farhat; D Jiang; D Cui; E T Keller; T L Jackson
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Using early biomarker data to predict long-term bone mineral density: application of semi-mechanistic bone cycle model on denosumab data.

Authors:  Jenny Zheng; Erno van Schaick; Liviawati Sutjandra Wu; Philippe Jacqmin; Juan Jose Perez Ruixo
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Parathyroid hormone as a marker for metabolic bone disease of prematurity.

Authors:  A Moreira; L Swischuk; M Malloy; D Mudd; C Blanco; C Geary
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Computational modeling reveals a key role for polarized myeloid cells in controlling osteoclast activity during bone injury repair.

Authors:  Chen Hao Lo; Etienne Baratchart; David Basanta; Conor C Lynch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Integrated computational and in vivo models reveal Key Insights into macrophage behavior during bone healing.

Authors:  Etienne Baratchart; Chen Hao Lo; Conor C Lynch; David Basanta
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.779

8.  The role of osteocytes in targeted bone remodeling: a mathematical model.

Authors:  Jason M Graham; Bruce P Ayati; Sarah A Holstein; James A Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Computational modeling of bone fracture non-unions: four clinically relevant case studies.

Authors:  Aurélie Carlier; Johan Lammens; Hans Van Oosterwyck; Liesbet Geris
Journal:  In Silico Cell Tissue Sci       Date:  2015-12-18

10.  Simulated Interventions to Ameliorate Age-Related Bone Loss Indicate the Importance of Timing.

Authors:  Carole J Proctor; Alison Gartland
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.