| Literature DB >> 28107633 |
Christina Tzitzoglaki1, Anna Wright2, Kathrin Freudenberger3, Anja Hoffmann4, Ian Tietjen5, Ioannis Stylianakis1, Felix Kolarov3, David Fedida5, Michaela Schmidtke4, Günter Gauglitz3, Timothy A Cross2,6, Antonios Kolocouris1.
Abstract
While aminoadamantanes are well-established inhibitors of the influenza A M2 proton channel, the mechanisms by which they are rendered ineffective against M2S31N are unclear. Solid state NMR, isothermal titration calorimetry, electrophysiology, antiviral assays, and molecular dynamics simulations suggest stronger binding interactions for aminoadamantanes to M2WT compared to negligible or weak binding to M2S31N. This is due to reshaping of the M2 pore when N31 is present, which, in contrast to wild-type (WT), leads (A) to the loss of the V27 pocket for the adamantyl cage and to a predominant orientation of the ligand's ammonium group toward the N-terminus and (B) to the lack of a helical kink upon ligand binding. The kink, which reduces the tilt of the C-terminal helical domain relative to the bilayer normal, includes the W41 primary gate for proton conductance and may prevent the gate from opening, representing an alternative view for how these drugs prevent proton conductance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28107633 PMCID: PMC9308172 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Chem ISSN: 0022-2623 Impact factor: 8.039