Literature DB >> 28107273

Influence of Depth of Hypnosis on Pupillary Reactivity to a Standardized Tetanic Stimulus in Patients Under Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion: A Crossover Randomized Pilot Study.

Nada Sabourdin1, Jean-Baptiste Peretout, Eliane Khalil, Marie-Laurence Guye, Nicolas Louvet, Isabelle Constant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pupillometry allows the measurement of pupillary diameter variations in response to nociceptive stimuli. This technique has been used to monitor the balance between analgesia and nociception. Under general anesthesia, the amplitude of pupillary dilation is related to the amount of administered opioids. The objective of this study was to determine whether at a constant infusion rate of opioids, the pupillary response was influenced by depth of hypnosis assessed by the bispectral index (BIS).
METHODS: Twelve patients (14-20 years) anesthetized for orthopedic surgery were included. Under propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion, remifentanil effect site target concentration was fixed at 1 ng/mL. Two measures of pupillary reflex dilation were performed on each patient in a randomized order: one at BIS 55 and one at BIS 25. These levels of BIS were obtained by adjusting propofol target concentration and maintained for 10 minutes before each measure. For each measure, we applied a standardized tetanic stimulation on the patient's forearm (60 mA, 100 Hz, 5 seconds). All measures were performed before the beginning of surgery.
RESULTS: Pupillary dilation was significantly greater at BIS 55 than at BIS 25: 32.1% ± 5.3% vs 10.4% ± 2.5% (mean difference estimate [95% confidence interval]: 21.8% [12.9-30.6], P < .001), without carryover effect (P = .30) nor period effect (P = .52). Hemodynamic parameters and BIS were not modified by the stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving a constant infusion of remifentanil at a target concentration of 1 ng/mL, pupillary dilation after a standardized tetanic stimulation was influenced by depth of hypnosis assessed by the BIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28107273     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  Automated Pupillometry in Neurocritical Care: Research and Practice.

Authors:  Bethany L Lussier; DaiWai M Olson; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Pharmacodynamic modelling of the effect of remifentanil using the Pupillary Pain Index.

Authors:  Sérgio Vide; Ana Castro; Pedro Antunes; Deolinda Lima; Merlin Larson; Pedro Gambús; Pedro Amorim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Pupillometry in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.

Authors:  Senthil Packiasabapathy; Valluvan Rangasamy; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.713

4.  Pain assessment by pupil dilation reflex in response to noxious stimulation in anaesthetized adults.

Authors:  D Wildemeersch; N Peeters; V Saldien; M Vercauteren; G Hans
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 5.  Nociception monitoring tools using autonomic tone changes for intraoperative analgesic guidance in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Byung Gun Lim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2019-10-31

6.  Bispectral index monitoring of the clinical effects of propofol closed-loop target-controlled infusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Danyang Wang; Zichen Song; Chunlu Zhang; Peng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Different perspectives for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Pablo Martinez-Vazquez; Erik Weber Jensen
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.