Literature DB >> 31119519

Pharmacodynamic modelling of the effect of remifentanil using the Pupillary Pain Index.

Sérgio Vide1,2,3,4,5, Ana Castro6, Pedro Antunes7, Deolinda Lima8,9,10, Merlin Larson11, Pedro Gambús12,11,13, Pedro Amorim14.   

Abstract

Using a targeted controlled infusion of remifentanil during total intravenous anesthesia, we investigated the effect-site concentrations of remifentanil that correlate with different values of the Pupillary Pain Index and which concentrations were necessary for achieving a Pupillary Pain Index ≤ 4 and its usefulness in titrating opioids. The Pupillary Pain Index was measured in 54 patients prior to surgery under different remifentanil effect-site concentrations and subsequently modeled. One hundred and twenty-eight measurements were taken at different remifentanil concentrations while titrating propofol for a similar depth of hypnosis using a BIS monitor. Our modeled Hill equation revealed a remifentanil of 2.96 ng/mL for a PPI of 4, and the probability model a Ce of 3.22 ng/mL for the probability of 50% of patients achieving a PPI score ≤ 4. For the probability of 80% of patients achieving a PPI score ≤ 4 the Ce of remifentanil was 4.39 ng/mL. We conclude that concentrations of remifentanil that have been shown to suppress movement in response to noxious stimulation correspond to a Pupillary Pain Index ≤ 4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nociception monitoring; PK-PD; Propofol; Pupillary Pain Index; Pupillary reflex dilation; Remifentanil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31119519     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00323-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

1.  Pupillometry-guided Intraoperative Remifentanil Administration versus Standard Practice Influences Opioid Use: A Randomized Study.

Authors:  Nada Sabourdin; Jérôme Barrois; Nicolas Louvet; Agnès Rigouzzo; Marie-Laurence Guye; Christophe Dadure; Isabelle Constant
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling.

Authors:  Sylvain Goutelle; Michel Maurin; Florent Rougier; Xavier Barbaut; Laurent Bourguignon; Michel Ducher; Pascal Maire
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.748

3.  Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol.

Authors:  M K Kim; J W Lee; D J Jang; O Y Shin; S B Nam
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil.

Authors:  L N Hannivoort; H E M Vereecke; J H Proost; B E K Heyse; D J Eleveld; T W Bouillon; M M R F Struys; M Luginbühl
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Effects of Ketamine on Pupillary Reflex Dilation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Sérgio Vide; Catarina M Costa; Pedro L Gambus; Pedro P Amorim
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2018-01-15

6.  Influence of Depth of Hypnosis on Pupillary Reactivity to a Standardized Tetanic Stimulus in Patients Under Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion: A Crossover Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Nada Sabourdin; Jean-Baptiste Peretout; Eliane Khalil; Marie-Laurence Guye; Nicolas Louvet; Isabelle Constant
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Prediction of movement to surgical stimulation by the pupillary dilatation reflex amplitude evoked by a standardized noxious test.

Authors:  Jean Guglielminotti; Nicolas Grillot; Marine Paule; France Mentré; Fréderique Servin; Philippe Montravers; Dan Longrois
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application.

Authors:  C F Minto; T W Schnider; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development.

Authors:  C F Minto; T W Schnider; T D Egan; E Youngs; H J Lemmens; P L Gambus; V Billard; J F Hoke; K H Moore; D J Hermann; K T Muir; J W Mandema; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Pain assessment by pupil dilation reflex in response to noxious stimulation in anaesthetized adults.

Authors:  D Wildemeersch; N Peeters; V Saldien; M Vercauteren; G Hans
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pupillometric Monitoring of Nociception in Cardiac Anesthesia.

Authors:  Felix Bartholmes; Nathalie M Malewicz; Melanie Ebel; Peter K Zahn; Christine H Meyer-Frießem
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Semimechanistic models to relate noxious stimulation, movement, and pupillary dilation responses in the presence of opioids.

Authors:  Nicolás Marco-Ariño; Sergio Vide; Mercè Agustí; Andrew Chen; Sebastián Jaramillo; Itziar Irurzun-Arana; Adrià Pacheco; Carmen Gonzalez; Erik W Jensen; Patricia Capsi-Morales; José F Valencia; Iñaki F Troconiz; Pedro L Gambus; Merlin D Larson
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.