| Literature DB >> 28104930 |
Elżbieta Bronisz1, Iwona Kurkowska-Jastrzębska1.
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinase 9 is a proteolytic enzyme which is recently one of the more often studied biomarkers. Its possible use as a biomarker of neuronal damage in stroke, heart diseases, tumors, multiple sclerosis, and epilepsy is being widely indicated. In epilepsy, MMP-9 is suggested to play a role in epileptic focus formation and in the stimulation of seizures. The increase of MMP-9 activity in the epileptic focus was observed both in animal models and in clinical studies. MMP-9 contributes to formation of epileptic focus, for example, by remodeling of synapses. Its proteolytic action on the elements of blood-brain barrier and activation of chemotactic processes facilitates accumulation of inflammatory cells and induces seizures. Also modification of glutamatergic transmission by MMP-9 is associated with seizures. In this review we will try to recapitulate the results of previous studies about MMP-9 in terms of its association with epilepsy. We will discuss the mechanisms of its actions and present the results revealed in animal models and clinical studies. We will also provide a comparison of the results of various studies on MMP-9 levels in the context of its possible use as a biomarker of the activity of epilepsy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28104930 PMCID: PMC5220508 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7369020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Figure 1The fields of MMP-9 action in epilepsy.
The results of the studies on MMP-9 level in blood serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and saliva (indications: “↑” increase; “↓” decrease; “?” no information).
| Disease entity | MMP-9 | MMP-9/TIMP-1 | Material | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Encephalopathy after the occurrence of febrile seizures versus febrile seizures | ↑↑ | ↑↑ | Blood serum | Suenaga et al. [ |
| Febrile seizures versus control | ↑ | ↑ | Blood serum | Suenaga et al. [ |
| HHV-6 infection with coexisting febrile seizures versus HHV-6 infection without seizures | No influence | ↓ | Blood serum | Kittaka et al. [ |
| HHV-6 infection without seizures versus control | ↑ | No influence | Blood serum | Kittaka et al. [ |
| Epilepsy after acute encephalitis versus control | No influence | ↑ | Blood serum | Suriadi et al. [ |
| Febrile seizures in children with encephalopathy caused by influenza versus control | ↑ | ↑ | Blood serum | Ichiyama et al. [ |
| TLE with coexisting hippocampal sclerosis versus control | ↑ | ↑ | Blood serum | Quirico-Santos et al. [ |
| TLE with coexisting hippocampal sclerosis versus patients after lobectomy due to hippocampal sclerosis | ↑ | ↑ | Blood serum | Quirico-Santos et al. [ |
| Epilepsy in patients with NPSLE versus patients with SLE without the neuropsychiatric manifestation | ↑ | ? | Blood serum | Ainiala et al. [ |
| Patients after generalized tonic-clonic seizures, convulsive and nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and partial complex seizures versus control | ↑ | ? | Blood serum | Cudna and Kurkowska-Jastrzębska [ |
| Bacterial meningitis complicated by febrile seizures versus uncomplicated bacterial meningitis | ↑ | ? | Cerebrospinal fluid | Leppert et al. [ |
| Patients after generalized tonic-clonic seizure versus control | ↑ | ? | Cerebrospinal fluid | Li et al. [ |
| Epilepsy in children versus control | ↓ | ? | Saliva | Shahar et al. [ |
| Poorly controlled epilepsy in children versus well controlled epilepsy in children | ↓↓ | ? | Saliva | Shahar et al. [ |