Literature DB >> 28104836

Validating a Predictive Model of Acute Advanced Imaging Biomarkers in Ischemic Stroke.

Andrew Bivard1, Christopher Levi2, Longting Lin2, Xin Cheng2, Richard Aviv2, Neil J Spratt2, Min Lou2, Tim Kleinig2, Billy O'Brien2, Kenneth Butcher2, Jingfen Zhang2, Jim Jannes2, Qiang Dong2, Mark Parsons2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Advanced imaging to identify tissue pathophysiology may provide more accurate prognostication than the clinical measures used currently in stroke. This study aimed to derive and validate a predictive model for functional outcome based on acute clinical and advanced imaging measures.
METHODS: A database of prospectively collected sub-4.5 hour patients with ischemic stroke being assessed for thrombolysis from 5 centers who had computed tomographic perfusion and computed tomographic angiography before a treatment decision was assessed. Individual variable cut points were derived from a classification and regression tree analysis. The optimal cut points for each assessment variable were then used in a backward logic regression to predict modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 1 and 5 to 6. The variables remaining in the models were then assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 1519 patients were included in the study, 635 in the derivation cohort and 884 in the validation cohort. The model was highly accurate at predicting mRS score of 0 to 1 in all patients considered for thrombolysis therapy (area under the curve [AUC] 0.91), those who were treated (AUC 0.88) and those with recanalization (AUC 0.89). Next, the model was highly accurate at predicting mRS score of 5 to 6 in all patients considered for thrombolysis therapy (AUC 0.91), those who were treated (0.89) and those with recanalization (AUC 0.91). The odds ratio of thrombolysed patients who met the model criteria achieving mRS score of 0 to 1 was 17.89 (4.59-36.35, P<0.001) and for mRS score of 5 to 6 was 8.23 (2.57-26.97, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study has derived and validated a highly accurate model at predicting patient outcome after ischemic stroke.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiography; area under the curve; basal ganglia; odds ratio; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28104836     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  13 in total

1.  Contralateral Hemispheric Cerebral Blood Flow Measured With Arterial Spin Labeling Can Predict Outcome in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Thoralf Thamm; Jia Guo; Jarrett Rosenberg; Tie Liang; Michael P Marks; Soren Christensen; Huy M Do; Stephanie M Kemp; Emma Adair; Irina Eyngorn; Michael Mlynash; Tudor G Jovin; Bart P Keogh; Hui J Chen; Maarten G Lansberg; Gregory W Albers; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Multimodal CT in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  R Wannamaker; B Buck; K Butcher
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Update on Neurocritical Care of Stroke.

Authors:  Jason Siegel; Michael A Pizzi; J Brent Peel; David Alejos; Nnenne Mbabuike; Benjamin L Brown; David Hodge; W David Freeman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Prognostic information of gaze deviation in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Ana Lima Silva; Ana Sofia Pessoa; Renato Nogueira; José Manuel Araújo; José Nuno Alves; João Pinho; Carla Ferreira
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Identification of embolic stroke in patients with large vessel occlusion: The Chinese embolic stroke score, CHESS.

Authors:  Lan Hong; Longting Lin; Gang Li; Jianhong Yang; Yu Geng; Min Lou; Mark Parsons; Xin Cheng; Qiang Dong
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 5.243

6.  Intravenous Thrombolysis May Not Improve Clinical Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Without a Baseline Vessel Occlusion.

Authors:  Huiqiao Tian; Mark W Parsons; Christopher R Levi; Xin Cheng; Richard I Aviv; Neil J Spratt; Timothy J Kleinig; Billy O'Brien; Kenneth S Butcher; Longting Lin; Jingfen Zhang; Qiang Dong; Chushuang Chen; Andrew Bivard
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Risk factors of perfusion and diffusion abnormalities on MRI in hemispheric TIA: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Jingjing Xiao; Yu Luo; Shaoshi Wang; Huazheng Liang; Lingjing Jin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence for decision support in acute stroke - current roles and potential.

Authors:  Andrew Bivard; Leonid Churilov; Mark Parsons
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Developing a multivariable prediction model for functional outcome after reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: study protocol for the Targeting Optimal Thrombolysis Outcomes (TOTO) multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Holliday; Thomas Lillicrap; Timothy Kleinig; Philip M C Choi; Jane Maguire; Andrew Bivard; Lisa F Lincz; Monica Anne Hamilton-Bruce; Sushma R Rao; Marten F Snel; Paul J Trim; Longting Lin; Mark W Parsons; Bradford B Worrall; Simon Koblar; John Attia; Chris Levi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Cost-effectiveness of targeted thrombolytic therapy for stroke patients using multi-modal CT compared to usual practice.

Authors:  Penny Reeves; Kim Edmunds; Christopher Levi; Longting Lin; Xin Cheng; Richard Aviv; Tim Kleinig; Kenneth Butcher; Jingfen Zhang; Mark Parsons; Andrew Bivard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.