Literature DB >> 31619150

Contralateral Hemispheric Cerebral Blood Flow Measured With Arterial Spin Labeling Can Predict Outcome in Acute Stroke.

Thoralf Thamm1,2, Jia Guo1,3, Jarrett Rosenberg1, Tie Liang1, Michael P Marks1, Soren Christensen4, Huy M Do1, Stephanie M Kemp4, Emma Adair4, Irina Eyngorn4, Michael Mlynash4, Tudor G Jovin5, Bart P Keogh6, Hui J Chen7, Maarten G Lansberg4, Gregory W Albers4, Greg Zaharchuk1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Imaging is frequently used to select acute stroke patients for intra-arterial therapy. Quantitative cerebral blood flow can be measured noninvasively with arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral blood flow levels in the contralateral (unaffected) hemisphere may affect capacity for collateral flow and patient outcome. The goal of this study was to determine whether higher contralateral cerebral blood flow (cCBF) in acute stroke identifies patients with better 90-day functional outcome. Methods- Patients were part of the prospective, multicenter iCAS study (Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke) between 2013 and 2017. Consecutive patients were enrolled after being diagnosed with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. Inclusion criteria were ischemic anterior circulation stroke, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥1, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score ≤2, onset-to-imaging time <24 hours, with imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging and arterial spin labeling. Patients were dichotomized into high and low cCBF groups based on median cCBF. Outcomes were assessed by day-1 and day-5 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and day-30 and day-90 modified Rankin Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test whether cCBF predicted good neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) at 90 days. Results- Seventy-seven patients (41 women) met the inclusion criteria with median (interquartile range) age of 66 (55-76) yrs, onset-to-imaging time of 4.8 (3.6-7.7) hours, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 13 (9-20). Median cCBF was 38.9 (31.2-44.5) mL per 100 g/min. Higher cCBF predicted good outcome at day 90 (odds ratio, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.4-14.7]; P=0.01), after controlling for baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume, and intra-arterial therapy. Conclusions- Higher quantitative cCBF at baseline is a significant predictor of good neurological outcome at day 90. cCBF levels may inform decisions regarding stroke triage, treatment of acute stroke, and general outcome prognosis. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02225730.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrovascular circulation; magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion imaging; prognosis; prospective studies; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31619150      PMCID: PMC7041883          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  59 in total

1.  Regional cerebral blood flow as assessed by principal component analysis and (99m)Tc-HMPAO SPET in healthy subjects at rest: normal distribution and effect of age and gender.

Authors:  Marco Pagani; Dario Salmaso; Cathrine Jonsson; Robert Hatherly; Hans Jacobsson; Stig A Larsson; Anna Wägner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Arterial spin-labeling MRI can identify the presence and intensity of collateral perfusion in patients with moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Greg Zaharchuk; Huy M Do; Michael P Marks; Jarrett Rosenberg; Michael E Moseley; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Cardiac index is associated with brain aging: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Angela L Jefferson; Jayandra J Himali; Alexa S Beiser; Rhoda Au; Joseph M Massaro; Sudha Seshadri; Philimon Gona; Carol J Salton; Charles DeCarli; Christopher J O'Donnell; Emelia J Benjamin; Philip A Wolf; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core.

Authors:  Bruce C V Campbell; Søren Christensen; Christopher R Levi; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Mark W Parsons
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  S Warach; J F Dashe; R R Edelman
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 6.  Advances in endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  H Asadi; R Dowling; B Yan; S Wong; P Mitchell
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  Use of 3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling to characterize sex and age differences in cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Wenjia Liu; Xin Lou; Lin Ma
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Automated CT Perfusion Ischemic Core Volume and Noncontrast CT ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score): Correlation and Clinical Outcome Prediction in Large Vessel Stroke.

Authors:  Diogo C Haussen; Seena Dehkharghani; Srikant Rangaraju; Leticia C Rebello; Mehdi Bouslama; Jonathan A Grossberg; Aaron Anderson; Samir Belagaje; Michael Frankel; Raul G Nogueira
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset.

Authors:  Götz Thomalla; Claus Z Simonsen; Florent Boutitie; Grethe Andersen; Yves Berthezene; Bastian Cheng; Bharath Cheripelli; Tae-Hee Cho; Franz Fazekas; Jens Fiehler; Ian Ford; Ivana Galinovic; Susanne Gellissen; Amir Golsari; Johannes Gregori; Matthias Günther; Jorge Guibernau; Karl Georg Häusler; Michael Hennerici; André Kemmling; Jacob Marstrand; Boris Modrau; Lars Neeb; Natalia Perez de la Ossa; Josep Puig; Peter Ringleb; Pascal Roy; Enno Scheel; Wouter Schonewille; Joaquin Serena; Stefan Sunaert; Kersten Villringer; Anke Wouters; Vincent Thijs; Martin Ebinger; Matthias Endres; Jochen B Fiebach; Robin Lemmens; Keith W Muir; Norbert Nighoghossian; Salvador Pedraza; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Value of Computed Tomographic Perfusion-Based Patient Selection for Intra-Arterial Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment.

Authors:  Jordi Borst; Olvert A Berkhemer; Yvo B W E M Roos; Ed van Bavel; Wim H van Zwam; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Hester F Lingsma; Aad van der Lugt; Diederik W J Dippel; Albert J Yoo; Henk A Marquering; Charles B L M Majoie
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  11 in total

1.  Pretreatment structural and arterial spin labeling MRI is predictive for p53 mutation in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Jiaji Mao; Dabiao Deng; Zehong Yang; Wensheng Wang; Minghui Cao; Yun Huang; Jun Shen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Hemispheric cerebral blood flow predicts outcome in acute small subcortical infarcts.

Authors:  Lan Hong; Yifeng Ling; Ya Su; Lumeng Yang; Longting Lin; Mark Parsons; Xin Cheng; Qiang Dong
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.960

3.  Editorial for "Pre-Surgical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Indicators of Revascularization Response in Adults With Moyamoya Vasculopathy".

Authors:  Yibin Xie
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.119

4.  Clinical Significance and Value of Serum Homocysteine and Urine 11 Dehydrothromboxane B2 Combined with Transferrin-Specific Peptide in the Diagnosis of Cerebral Apoplexy.

Authors:  Junli Liu; Juan He; Chang Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Use of Deep Learning to Predict Final Ischemic Stroke Lesions From Initial Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yannan Yu; Yuan Xie; Thoralf Thamm; Enhao Gong; Jiahong Ouyang; Charles Huang; Soren Christensen; Michael P Marks; Maarten G Lansberg; Gregory W Albers; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02

6.  Multiphase arterial spin labeling imaging to predict early recurrent ischemic lesion in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Chi Kyung Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Ki-Woong Nam; Byung-Woo Yoon; Inpyeong Hwang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Association of cerebral microvascular perfusion and diffusion dynamics detected by intravoxel incoherent motion-diffusion weighted imaging with initial neurological function and clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Zhenyu Dai; Lizheng Yao; Congsong Dong; Haicun Shi; Weiqiang Dou; Wei Xing
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induces Quantified Functional and Structural Changes in Subcortical Stroke: A Combined Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Xi Bai; Binghu Jiang; Zhiwei Guo; Qiwen Mu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Activation of endothelial Wnt/β-catenin signaling by protective astrocytes repairs BBB damage in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Shanshan Song; Huachen Huang; Xiudong Guan; Victoria Fiesler; Mohammad Iqbal H Bhuiyan; Ruijia Liu; Shayan Jalali; Md Nabiul Hasan; Albert K Tai; Ansuman Chattopadhyay; Srilakshmi Chaparala; Ming Sun; Donna B Stolz; Pingnian He; Dritan Agalliu; Dandan Sun; Gulnaz Begum
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Cerebral perfusion mediated by thalamo-cortical functional connectivity in non-dominant thalamus affects naming ability in aphasia.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Zhen Zhou; Lingling Li; Jing Ye; Desheng Shang; Shuchang Zhong; Bo Yao; Cong Xu; Yamei Yu; Fangping He; Xiangming Ye; Benyan Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.