Literature DB >> 28104245

Assessing kinematics and kinetics of functional electrical stimulation rowing.

Adina E Draghici1, Glen Picard2, J Andrew Taylor3, Sandra J Shefelbine4.   

Abstract

Hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) rowing has positive effects on cardiovascular fitness, producing significantly greater aerobic power than either upper body or FES exercise alone. However, there is minimal information on the kinematics, kinetics, and mechanical efficiency of FES-rowing in the spinal cord injured (SCI) population. This study examined the biomechanics of FES-rowing to determine how motions, forces, and aerobic demand change with increasing intensity. Six individuals with SCI and six able-bodied subjects performed a progressive aerobic capacity rowing test. Differences in kinematics (motion profiles), kinetics (forces produced by the feet and arms), external mechanical work, and mechanical efficiency (work produced/volume of oxygen consumed) were compared in able-bodied rowing vs. SCI FES-rowing at three comparable subpeak workloads. With increasing exercise intensity (measured as wattage), able-bodied rowing increased stroke rate by decreasing recovery time, while FES-rowing maintained a constant stroke rate, with no change in drive or recovery times. While able-bodied rowers increased leg and arm forces with increasing intensity, FES-rowers used only their arms to achieve a higher intensity with a constant and relatively low contribution of the legs. Oxygen consumption increased in both groups, but more so in able-bodied rowers, resulting in able-bodied rowers having twice the mechanical efficiency of FES-rowers. Our results suggest that despite its ability to allow for whole body exercise, the total force output achievable with FES-rowing results in only modest loading of the legs that affects overall rowing performance and that may limit forces applied to bone.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic work; FES-rowing; Kinematics; Kinetics; Mechanical efficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28104245      PMCID: PMC5340620          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  38 in total

1.  Absence of training-specific cardiac adaptation in paraplegic athletes.

Authors:  Phillip E Gates; Ian G Campbell; Keith P George
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Aerobic capacity with hybrid FES rowing in spinal cord injury: comparison with arms-only exercise and preliminary findings with regular training.

Authors:  J Andrew Taylor; Glen Picard; Jeffrey J Widrick
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  The use of functional electrical stimulation for rehabilitation of spinal cord injured patients.

Authors:  J S Petrofsky; C A Phillips
Journal:  Cent Nerv Syst Trauma       Date:  1984

4.  Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M J DeVivo; J S Krause; D P Lammertse
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Influence of different stimulation frequencies on power output and fatigue during FES-cycling in recently injured SCI people.

Authors:  Prisca C Eser; Nick de N Donaldson; Hans Knecht; Edgar Stüssi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Effects of functional electrical stimulation-induced lower extremity cycling on bone density of spinal cord-injured patients.

Authors:  K K BeDell; A M Scremin; K L Perell; C F Kunkel
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Fuzzy logic control of FES rowing exercise in paraplegia.

Authors:  Rahman Davoodi; Brian J Andrews
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 8.  Exercise responses and quadriplegia.

Authors:  S F Figoni
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Effects of compression stockings on sympathetic activity and heart rate variability in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Diana Rimaud; Paul Calmels; Vincent Pichot; Francois Bethoux; Frederic Roche
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Leg joint power output during progressive resistance FES-LCE cycling in SCI subjects: developing an index of fatigue.

Authors:  Stephenie A Haapala; Pouran D Faghri; Douglas J Adams
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted rowing combined with zoledronic acid, but not alone, preserves distal femur strength and stiffness in people with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Y Fang; L R Morse; N Nguyen; R A Battaglino; R F Goldstein; K L Troy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Timing and Modulation of Activity in the Lower Limb Muscles During Indoor Rowing: What Are the Key Muscles to Target in FES-Rowing Protocols?

Authors:  Taian M Vieira; Giacinto Luigi Cerone; Costanza Stocchi; Morgana Lalli; Brian Andrews; Marco Gazzoni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Effects of FES-Rowing Exercise on the Time-Dependent Changes in Bone Microarchitecture After Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Investigation.

Authors:  Adina E Draghici; J Andrew Taylor; Mary L Bouxsein; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-09-03

4.  Development of a Coaching System for Functional Electrical Stimulation Rowing: A Feasibility Study in Able-Bodied Individuals.

Authors:  Shirin Tajali; Kai Lon Fok; Pirashanth Theventhiran; Gongkai Ye; Hikaru Yokoyama; Kento Nakagawa; Kei Masani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.