Literature DB >> 8645435

Effects of functional electrical stimulation-induced lower extremity cycling on bone density of spinal cord-injured patients.

K K BeDell1, A M Scremin, K L Perell, C F Kunkel.   

Abstract

Spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients are at increased risk for fractures secondary to neurogenic osteoporosis. Earlier research claimed physical conditioning resulted in a decreased incidence or reversal of neurogenic osteoporosis. This study evaluated the effects of functional electrical stimulation-induced lower extremity cycling (FESILEC) on the bone densities of SCI patients using dual-energy x/ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The study consisted of 12 healthy male SCI patients, aged 23 to 46 (x +/- SD, 34 +/- 6) yr. The patients were post-traumatic, complete, spastic SCI; time postinjury ranged from 2 to 19 (9.7 +/- 5.1) yr. Patients participated in a three-phase training program. Phase 1 consisted of quadriceps strengthening. Phase 2 consisted of progressive sequential stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal muscles, achieving a rhythmical pedaling motion on the REGYS I ergometer. Phase 3a consisted of 30-min FESILEC sessions. DEXAs were done at baseline and at completion of Phase 3a and Phase 3b. Bone densities were done of the lumbar spine levels 2-4 (L2-4), bilateral trochanters (T), Ward's triangles (WT) and femoral necks (FN). Baseline bone density indicated no difference between L2-4 of ambulatory males and SCI males. Baseline values obtained for T, WT, and FN were, respectively, 71, 82, and 79% of ambulatory values. Results after completion of the Phase 3a training program indicated no statistically significant difference compared with baseline values. There was, however, a positive trend in the lumbar spine post-Phase 3a (L2-4, P=0.056). Eight patients continued the exercise program, using a combination of upper and lower extremity cycling (Phase 3b) for a longer period of time (25 +/- 9 wk). DEXAs done after Phase 3b indicated no change relative to baseline data or data post-Phase 3a. In conclusion, although FESILEC did not significantly increase bone density in the hip parameters of chronic SCI patients, a positive trend was observed in the lumbar spine. Further research with acute intervention, such as FESILEC during the first few months post-SCI, is warranted to further evaluate a treatment regimen to prevent or reduce neurogenic osteopenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8645435     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199601000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  34 in total

1.  Predictive model of muscle fatigue after spinal cord injury in humans.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Ya-Ju Chang; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Cheng-Hsiang Lin
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Physiatrists' opinions and practice patterns for bone health after SCI.

Authors:  M C Ashe; J J Eng; A Krassioukov
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation strategies.

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Neil McCartney
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Does standing protect bone density in patients with chronic spinal cord injury?

Authors:  Ahmet Salim Goktepe; Ilknur Tugcu; Bilge Yilmaz; Ridvan Alaca; Sukru Gunduz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on body composition.

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Catharine Craven; Kieva Richards; Naaz Kapadia; Sander L Hitzig; Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Bone loss and fractures in limbs paralyzed by spinal cord injury: Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Kristjan T Ragnarsson
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Functional electrical stimulation cycling in youth with spinal cord injury: A review of intervention studies.

Authors:  Tanja A Mayson; Susan R Harris
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

9.  Dose estimation and surveillance of mechanical loading interventions for bone loss after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-01-17

10.  Outcomes of a home cycling program using functional electrical stimulation or passive motion for children with spinal cord injury: a case series.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Brian T Smith; Oluwabunmi Oladeji; Randal R Betz; Richard T Lauer
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.