Literature DB >> 18070953

Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study.

E Wu1, J T Ortiz, P Tejedor, D C Lee, C Bucciarelli-Ducci, P Kansal, J C Carr, T A Holly, D Lloyd-Jones, F J Klocke, R O Bonow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ejection fraction (EF) and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) are established predictors of outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to assess the relative impact of infarct size, EF and ESVI on clinical outcomes and left ventricular (LV) remodelling.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic hospital in Chicago, USA. PATIENTS: 122 patients with STEMI following acute percutaneous reperfusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure.
METHODS: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was obtained within 1 week following STEMI in 122 subjects. ESVI, EF and infarct size were tested for the association with outcomes over 2 years in 113 subjects, and a repeat study was obtained 4 months later to assess LV remodelling in 91 subjects.
RESULTS: Acute infarct size correlated linearly with the initial ESVI (r = 0.69, p<0.001), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (r = 0.42, p<0.001) and EF (r = -0.75, p<0.001). All were independently associated with outcomes (one death, one recurrent MI and 16 heart failure admissions). However, infarct size was the only significant predictor of adverse outcomes (p<0.05) by multivariate analysis. The smallest infarct size tertile had an increased EF (49% (SD 8%) to 53% (6%); p = 0.002) and unchanged EDVI (p = 0.7). In contrast, subjects with the largest infarct tertile also had improved EF (32% (9%) to 36% (11%); p = 0.002) at the expense of a dramatic increase in EDVI (86 (19) to 95 (21) ml/m(2); p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Infarct size, EF and ESVI can predict the development of future cardiac events. Acute infarct size, which is independent of LV stunning and loading, directly relates to LV remodelling and is a stronger predictor of future events than measures of LV systolic performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070953     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.122622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  117 in total

1.  Reliability of myocardial salvage assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute reperfused myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Steffen Desch; Hubertus Engelhardt; Josefine Meissner; Ingo Eitel; Mahdi Sareban; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xu; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Sung-A Chang; Sang-Chol Lee; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Jae K Oh; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  The role of non-invasive imaging in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  C Roobottom; G Mitchell; S Iyengar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Determination of location, size, and transmurality of chronic myocardial infarction without exogenous contrast media by using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T.

Authors:  Avinash Kali; Ivan Cokic; Richard L Q Tang; Hsin-Jung Yang; Behzad Sharif; Eduardo Marbán; Debiao Li; Daniel S Berman; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Head to head comparison of quantitative versus visual analysis of contrast CMR in the setting of myocardial stunning after STEMI: implications on late systolic function and patient outcome.

Authors:  Oliver Husser; Vicente Bodi; Juan Sanchis; Julio Nunez; Luis Mainar; Pilar Merlos; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Jose V Monmeneu; Fabian Chaustre; Eva Rumiz; Günter A J Riegger; Francisco J Chorro; Angel Llacer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Timing of cardiovascular MR imaging after acute myocardial infarction: effect on estimates of infarct characteristics and prediction of late ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Adam N Mather; Timothy A Fairbairn; Nigel J Artis; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 8.  Role of cardiac MRI in diabetes.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Usefulness of Q-wave area for threshold-based stratification of global left ventricular myocardial infarct size.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kochav; Peter M Okin; Sean Wilson; Anika Afroz; Alfredo Renilla; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Hotline sessions of the 30th European Congress of Cardiology.

Authors:  Dan Atar
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.