| Literature DB >> 28102196 |
Jonas Doerr1,2, Martin Karl Schwarz2,3, Dirk Wiedermann4, Anke Leinhaas1, Alina Jakobs1, Florian Schloen5, Inna Schwarz3, Michael Diedenhofen4, Nils Christian Braun1, Philipp Koch1, Daniel A Peterson6, Ulrich Kubitscheck5, Mathias Hoehn4, Oliver Brüstle1,2.
Abstract
While transplantation represents a key tool for assessing in vivo functionality of neural stem cells and their suitability for neural repair, little is known about the integration of grafted neurons into the host brain circuitry. Rabies virus-based retrograde tracing has developed into a powerful approach for visualizing synaptically connected neurons. Here, we combine this technique with light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) to visualize transplanted cells and connected host neurons in whole-mouse brain preparations. Combined with co-registration of high-precision three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) reference data sets, this approach enables precise anatomical allocation of the host input neurons. Our data show that the same neural donor cell population grafted into different brain regions receives highly orthotopic input. These findings indicate that transplant connectivity is largely dictated by the circuitry of the target region and depict rabies-based transsynaptic tracing and LSFM as efficient tools for comprehensive assessment of host-donor cell innervation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28102196 PMCID: PMC5253698 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Experimental procedure for tracing host-graft connectivity.
Lt-NES cells were transduced with two lentiviral vectors expressing mRFP1, and an H2B.EGFP fusion protein coupled via 2A peptides to the TVA receptor and the RABV B19 glycoprotein. Ten weeks after transplantation the grafts were infected with RABVΔG-EGFP(EnvA), which enables monosynaptic retrograde tracing of afferent host neurons. Parts of the schematic were produced using Servier Medical Art (http://www.servier.com).
Figure 2Whole-mount imaging of grafted human lt-NES cells.
(a,b) Human grafts in the hippocampus (a) and striatum (b) as detected by their mRFP1 expression. Insets depict magnified graft cores as determined by 3D surface rendering. (c,d) Co-visualization of mRFP1 and EGFP fluorescence identifies RABVΔG-EGFP-infected donor cells while exclusively EGFP+ cells represent retrogradely labelled host neurons connected to engrafted neurons. (c) Hippocampal grafts (HC) receive orthotopic input from the entorhinal cortex (EC; coloured arrows indicate neurons and their corresponding axon), the septum (SE) and intrahippocampal host neurons within the pyramidal cell layer and stratum oriens. Striatal grafts (d) are largely innervated by cortical neurons as well as adjacent striatal neurons. Shown are representative images from n=3 cleared brains per transplantation site; scale bars as indicated.
Figure 3Anatomical distribution of host neurons projecting onto grafted human neurons.
Simultaneous representation of LSFM-recorded EGFP-labelled neurons and co-registration with MRI data in recipient mouse brains with (a) hippocampal and (b) striatal grafts. Host cells innervating the hippocampal graft are allocated to adjacent hippocampal territories, septum and entorhinal cortex. In brains harbouring striatal grafts, MRI co-registration permitted the allocation of host input neurons to cortical subregions such as motor cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex and distinct areas within primary somatosensory cortex. Shown are representative images from n=3 cleared brains per transplantation site; scale bars as indicated. (c) Quantification and anatomical allocation of EGFP+ host neurons innervating the grafted human neurons. Red vertical bars indicate mean values for 3 recipient animals each (grey horizontal bars). Shown is the percentage of all detected EGFP+ host neurons.