| Literature DB >> 29721067 |
Jeremy Epah1, Katalin Pálfi1, Franziska Luise Dienst1, Pedro Felipe Malacarne1, Rolf Bremer2, Michael Salamon3, Sandeep Kumar4, Hanjoong Jo4, Christoph Schürmann1,5, Ralf Peter Brandes1,5.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Classic histology is the gold standard for vascular network imaging and analysis. The method however is laborious and prone to artefacts. Here, the suitability of ultramicroscopy (UM) and micro-computed tomography (CT) was studied to establish potential alternatives to histology.Entities:
Keywords: Light sheet fluorescence microscopy; Micro-CT; Ultra microscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29721067 PMCID: PMC5928875 DOI: 10.7150/thno.22610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Study design
| Mouse strain | C57BL/6 | C57BL/6 | C57BL/6 | C57BL/6 | SCID | ApoE-/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study, Figure | Heart, Fig. | Kidney 1, | Kidney 2* | Matrigel plug | Spheroid matrigel plug | Partial c. ligation** Fig. |
| Imaging modality | ||||||
| ca | vvf, # | a | cca, ####, | |||
| cca, vv, #### | ||||||
| ca, c, aSMA | vvf, g, c, aSMA, vvf, # | g, c, p, ## | c, cd, ### | c, h, vvf, bp | cca, c, vv | |
| cca, c, vv | ||||||
| g, c, aSMA | c, cd, ### | c, h, vvf, bp |
Murine vascular network studies of the heart, kidney, matrigel plug, spheroid matrigel plug and atherosclerotic plaque after partial ligation of the left common carotid artery were performed. All studies analysed vascular networks in given samples. Kidney study 2 not only analysed vascular networks but also compared different tissue clearing methods for UM. If not indicated otherwise, 3DISCO was used as clearing method for UM. The following compartments were visualized or parameters extracted: aSMA: a-smooth muscle actin positive vessel; a: arteriols; bp: branching points; c: capillary diameter; ca: left coronary artery vessel diameter; cca: common carotid artery; g: glomeruli diameter; h: HUVEC amount; p: parenchyma; vvf: vascular volume fraction; vv: vasa vasora. *: clearing methods: 3DISCO, BABB, ECi or iDISCO+; **: clearing method ethanol; #: analysis of the same animal, left respectively right kidney; ##: analysis of the same animal, fourth part of the left kidney; ###: analysis of the same sample, first UM scan then LSM; ####: analysis of the same sample, first micro-CT scan then nano-CT. Micro-CT data were analyzed with Imalytics Preclinical and UM data with Imaris (Bitplane Version 7.6). CT: computed tomography; H/E: hematoxylin and eosin; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; Isolectin: Isolectin GS-IB4 A647; LSM: laser scanning confocal microscopy; UM: ultra-microscopy.
Overview of the advantages and disadvantages of micro-CT (Skyscan 1176), nano-CT (Subµ-CT Lab, Fraunhofer EZRT), UM (Ultramicroscope II) and LSM (LSM 510 meta) employed for multiscale vascular network analysis.
| Imaging modality | Suited applications | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| ++ Coronary artery | Medium resolution (µm) | Vessel perfusion with contrast agent not always possible | |
| + Whole vasculature of the kidney | In and ex vivo technique | Signal to background ratio even with contrast agents not always high enough | |
| ++ Kidney artery/ veins | Several blood pool contrast agents commercially available | Acquisition time 1 h 45 min | |
| ++ Carotid artery | Robust segmentation of vessel filled with contrast agent | Raw data size: 13 GB, reconstructed data size: 0.3 GB-1.1 GB | |
| High sample coverage (2 cm) or more with sub scan | Movement artifacts of biological samples | ||
| + Coronary artery | High resolution (nm-µm) | Vessel perfusion with contrast agent not always possible | |
| ++ Kidney artery/ veins | Several blood pool contrast agents commercially available | Acquisition time 1 h 55 min - 4 h | |
| + Carotid artery | Robust segmentation of vessel filled with contrast agent, many contrast agents available | Raw data size: 6.25 GB, reconstructed data size: 17 GB | |
| ++ Atherosclerotic plaque vasa vasora | “Cell type” specific soft tissue contrast to distinguish atherosclerotic plaque tissue, fat and vessel | Medium sample coverage (2 mm), depends on magnification | |
| Movement artifacts of biological samples | |||
| Sample sectioning necessary for high resolution images | |||
| ++ Heart capillaries | High resolution (1 µm-2 µm) | Tissue clearing and bleaching of fluorescent signal | |
| ++ Kidney glomeruli | Multi target-, color application, fluorescence proximity analysis | Whole mount staining needs optimization processes | |
| ++ Kidney artery/ veins | Homogenous Isolectin staining | Raw data size 8.5 GB-43 GB, reconstructed data size: 6 GB-28 GB | |
| ++ Kidney capillaries | Acquisition time 20 min-40 min | Tissue shrinkage | |
| ++ Cell based matrigel assay | No movement artifacts due to dehydration | Segmentation of big vessel is time consuming | |
| ++ Matrigel capillaries | Medium sample coverage (0.7 cm), sample sectioning enhance fluorescence signal intensity | ||
| + Atherosclerotic plaque vasa vasora | Decay of fluorescence signal over time | ||
| ++ Atherosclerotic plaque capillaries | |||
| + Kidney glomeruli | High resolution (nm-µm) | Sectioning is time consuming and destructive to the sample | |
| + Kidney artery/ veins | Multi target-, color application, fluorescence proximity analysis | 3D orientation has to be defined before sectioning and has and impact on results | |
| + Kidney capillaries | Homogenous Isolectin staining | Bleaching of fluorescent signal | |
| + Cell based matrigel assay | Acquisition time 3 min-20 min | Low sample coverage (~4 µm-50 µm/slide), observer-dependent as the analyzed region of interest is usually smaller compared to UM or micro-CT | |
| + Matrigel capillaries | Many staining protocols in the literature available | Tissue shrinkage | |
| + Atherosclerotic plaque vasa vasora | Raw data size 0.01 GB-0.1 GB | ||
| + Atherosclerotic plaque capillaries |
+: suited; ++: well suited; CT: computed tomography; GB: gigabyte; LSM: laser scanning confocal microscopy; UM: ultra-microscopy.