Literature DB >> 18434522

Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion.

Mamiko Niwa1, Jochen Ditterich.   

Abstract

Previous studies and models of perceptual decision making have largely focused on binary choices. However, we often have to choose from multiple alternatives. To study the neural mechanisms underlying multialternative decision making, we have asked human subjects to make perceptual decisions between multiple possible directions of visual motion. Using a multicomponent version of the random-dot stimulus, we were able to control experimentally how much sensory evidence we wanted to provide for each of the possible alternatives. We demonstrate that this task provides a rich quantitative dataset for multialternative decision making, spanning a wide range of accuracy levels and mean response times. We further present a computational model that can explain the structure of our behavioral dataset. It is based on the idea of a race between multiple integrators to a decision threshold. Each of these integrators accumulates net sensory evidence for a particular choice, provided by linear combinations of the activities of decision-relevant pools of sensory neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18434522      PMCID: PMC6670944          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5564-07.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Raoul P P P Grasman; Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Scott D Brown; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Inhibition in superior colliculus neurons in a brightness discrimination task?

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Yukako T Hasegawa; Ryohei P Hasegawa; Russ Childers; Philip L Smith; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  The encoding of alternatives in multiple-choice decision making.

Authors:  Larissa Albantakis; Gustavo Deco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Decision making in recurrent neuronal circuits.

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Saccade target selection relies on feedback competitive signal integration.

Authors:  Joke P Kalisvaart; André J Noest; Albert V van den Berg; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: recognition memory and motion discrimination.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  A Comparison between Mechanisms of Multi-Alternative Perceptual Decision Making: Ability to Explain Human Behavior, Predictions for Neurophysiology, and Relationship with Decision Theory.

Authors:  Jochen Ditterich
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.