Literature DB >> 17716296

Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.

S Y Chu1, S Y Kim, C H Schmid, P M Dietz, W M Callaghan, J Lau, K M Curtis.   

Abstract

Despite numerous studies reporting an increased risk of cesarean delivery among overweight or obese compared with normal weight women, the magnitude of the association remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the current literature to provide a quantitative estimate of this association. We identified studies from three sources: (i) a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 1980 and September 2005; (ii) reference lists of publications selected from the search; and (iii) reference lists of review articles published between 2000 and 2005. We included cohort designed studies that reported obesity measures reflecting pregnancy body mass, had a normal weight comparison group, and presented data allowing a quantitative measurement of risk. We used a Bayesian random effects model to perform the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Thirty-three studies were included. The unadjusted odd ratios of a cesarean delivery were 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.60], 2.05 (95% CI: 1.86-2.27) and 2.89 (95% CI: 2.28-3.79) among overweight, obese and severely obese women, respectively, compared with normal weight pregnant women. The meta-regression found no evidence that these estimates were affected by selected study characteristics. Our findings provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of cesarean delivery associated with high maternal body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17716296     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00397.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  119 in total

1.  Exercise guidelines in pregnancy: new perspectives.

Authors:  Gerald S Zavorsky; Lawrence D Longo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Prepregnancy obesity trends among low-income women, United States, 1999-2008.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hinkle; Andrea J Sharma; Shin Y Kim; Sohyun Park; Karen Dalenius; Patricia L Brindley; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

Review 3.  The Risks Associated With Obesity in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Johannes Stubert; Frank Reister; Steffi Hartmann; Wolfgang Janni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Obesity in Pregnancy: Obstetrician' s Obstacle.

Authors:  Suvarna Satish Khadilkar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-05-15

5.  The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health.

Authors:  Meaghan A Leddy; Michael L Power; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

6.  Determinants of cesarean delivery in the US: a lifecourse approach.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Lauren E Wisk; Erika R Cheng; Kara Mandell; Debanjana Chatterjee; Fathima Wakeel; Amy L Godecker; Dakota Zarak
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

7.  Is obesity still increasing among pregnant women? Prepregnancy obesity trends in 20 states, 2003-2009.

Authors:  S C Fisher; S Y Kim; A J Sharma; R Rochat; B Morrow
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Gestational weight gain among Hispanic women.

Authors:  Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Kim Lam; Susan P Raine
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  Maternal metabolism and obesity: modifiable determinants of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Phillippa Matthews; Lucilla Poston
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Obstetric risk factors and pelvic floor dysfunction 20 years after first delivery.

Authors:  Lucia M Dolan; Paul Hilton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.