Kavita Singh1,2, Ilene Speizer1,2, Eunsoo Timothy Kim1,2, Clara Lemani3, Ann Phoya3. 1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. Safe Motherhood Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether two maternity waiting homes (MWHs) supported by the Safe Motherhood Initiative are reaching vulnerable women during the early phase of their implementation. METHODS: A cross-sectional interview-based study was conducted among women who attended two centers in Malawi with attached MWHs (Area 25 Health Centre, Lilongwe; and Kasungu District Hospital, Kasungu). Between April and June 2015, exit interviews were conducted among MWH users and non-users. RESULTS: Compared with non-users, MWH users at Area 25 were significantly more likely to report a prior spontaneous abortion (10/46 [21.7%] vs 5/95 [5.3%]; P=0.006) and to be in the lowest wealth quintile (4/87 [4.6%] vs 0/150; P=0.029). Although not significant, a greater percentage of MWH users at Kasungu District Hospital than non-users had a prior stillbirth (6/84 [7.1%] vs 0/77) or spontaneous abortion (3/84 [3.6%] vs 2/77 [2.6%]), and were in the lowest wealth quintile (15/175 [8.6%] vs 5/141 [3.5%]). MWH users at Kasungu lived further from the hospital than did non-MWH users, although the difference was not significant (mean 6.81±9.1 km vs 4.05±7.42 km; P=0.067). CONCLUSION: MWHs offer a promising strategy to reduce maternal mortality in Malawi and other low-income countries.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether two maternity waiting homes (MWHs) supported by the Safe Motherhood Initiative are reaching vulnerable women during the early phase of their implementation. METHODS: A cross-sectional interview-based study was conducted among women who attended two centers in Malawi with attached MWHs (Area 25 Health Centre, Lilongwe; and Kasungu District Hospital, Kasungu). Between April and June 2015, exit interviews were conducted among MWH users and non-users. RESULTS: Compared with non-users, MWH users at Area 25 were significantly more likely to report a prior spontaneous abortion (10/46 [21.7%] vs 5/95 [5.3%]; P=0.006) and to be in the lowest wealth quintile (4/87 [4.6%] vs 0/150; P=0.029). Although not significant, a greater percentage of MWH users at Kasungu District Hospital than non-users had a prior stillbirth (6/84 [7.1%] vs 0/77) or spontaneous abortion (3/84 [3.6%] vs 2/77 [2.6%]), and were in the lowest wealth quintile (15/175 [8.6%] vs 5/141 [3.5%]). MWH users at Kasungu lived further from the hospital than did non-MWH users, although the difference was not significant (mean 6.81±9.1 km vs 4.05±7.42 km; P=0.067). CONCLUSION: MWHs offer a promising strategy to reduce maternal mortality in Malawi and other low-income countries.
Authors: Cephas Sialubanje; Karlijn Massar; Marit S G van der Pijl; Elisa Maria Kirch; Davidson H Hamer; Robert A C Ruiter Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Kavita Singh; Ilene S Speizer; Eunsoo Timothy Kim; Clara Lemani; Jennifer H Tang; Ann Phoya Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Anne K Erickson; Safa Abdalla; Alice Serenska; Bete Demeke; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 3.007